December 2021 Newsletter

Posted on December 1, 2021 by admin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”949″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_custom_heading text=”“A Piece of My Mind”” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:50px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”December 2021 Newsletter” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:30px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

Advancing Christian Faith and Values,
Defending Religious Liberty for All,
Supporting Civility and the Common Good
through Preaching, Teaching, Writing, Activism and Reasoned Conversations

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”1304″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

“Hark! The Herald Angels Sing”

Christ, by highest Heav’n adored;
Christ the everlasting Lord;
Late in time, behold Him come,
Offspring of a virgin’s womb.
Veiled in flesh the Godhead see;
Hail th’incarnate Deity,
Pleased as man with us to dwell,
Jesus our Emmanuel.
Hark! The herald angels sing,
“Glory to the newborn king!”

Among the best known and loved Christmas carols—certainly one of the best Christian hymns ever written—it was composed by Charles Wesley in 1739. The familiar tune was composed by Felix Mendelssohn in 1740.[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

A Less-familiar Christmas Scripture

Mary, Joseph and Baby Jesus. King Herod and the “Wise Men.” The angels and shepherds—The Gospels of Matthew and Luke give us the familiar Christmas themes we love to recall, recite and sing about.

The Gospel of Mark skips the first 30 years of Jesus’ life and starts with Jesus hitting the ground running—being baptized and starting his ministry.

The Gospel of John, likely written more than 80 years after Jesus’ birth, takes time to reflect upon and “theologize” about Jesus. Just who was this person?

Simply put, the Christmas Message in John’s Gospel is “In Jesus, God Became One of Us, that We Might Know Him and Become His Children.”

The Gospel of John is written to ignite in us a faith that affirms the same truths about Jesus that John’s Prologue (1:1-18) does. “Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name” (John 20:30-31).

What key answers does John give us to the question, “Who is Jesus?”

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men. (John 1:1-4)

Let’s start in verse one with the rather unusual statement that Jesus was “the Word.” A strange title for us but not novel at all to thinkers in New Testament times, “Word” conveys ideas such as “communication, disclosure, announcement, reason.” Point: Jesus is (and gives) the Truth of God to us.

Second, Jesus (God’s Word to us) was “in the beginning.” What “beginning” the author has in mind, I’m not sure. The same “beginning” as in Genesis 1:1 (“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”)? Perhaps. It’s best to be cautious and not assign a time to “the beginning.”

Point: there never was a “time” when the Word “was not.” Each Christmas season we start the story of Jesus with his birth in Bethlehem. That’s not wrong, but it must not conceal something more ultimate: Jesus is “from the beginning.” He does not have his origin in a manger or in Mary’s womb.

Third, Jesus was with God “from the beginning.” This stresses intimacy.

The point to know is: Jesus was “there” with God in (hence, “since”) the very beginning. If anyone ought to know God perfectly, it would be Jesus.

Fourth, Jesus himself “is” God. This sounds contradictory, but it is not. How could Jesus be “with” God and also “be God?” The historical answer is still the best one—God is “one” and yet God exists as “Father, Son and Holy Spirit.”

So, in three short phrases John begins his letter with a mountain of declarations about Jesus—his eternity, his presence with God the Father, and his essence as God (whatever God is, the Word is). If you want to know God, the best source is from the Word who was ever with God and is himself God (Hebrews 1:1-2).

Fifth, we learn the role of the Word in creation (verse three). “Through him all things were made.” And lest we miss or compromise the point, “…without him nothing was made that has been made.” Followers of Jesus should be very creation-affirming. Spirituality is not disengagement from what is made (if we do that, we are casting aspersion on its Creator); true spirituality celebrates creation and thrives in it.

The true light, which gives light to everyone, was coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made through him, yet the world did not know him. He came to his own, and his own people did not receive him. But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God… (John 1:9-12)

In verse nine, we learn our sixth key answer to “who is Jesus?” Jesus is light. Actually, he is “life” and that “life” is “light” to us all. His coming to earth brightens up the world. Sadly, many choose to reject that light. But—Good News!—all who receive that light (in other words, all who believe in him) become children of God. The whole Gospel of John was written so we might read and believe, and become children of God.

And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:14)

Seventh, the “Word” that was from the beginning with God and who is himself God, became human (“flesh” is both literally true and much more than what we think of as “flesh”). He became human in every way. He was “flesh, blood and bone, muscle and mind” like us (not merely a divine spirit inside a body).

Christian thinking, based especially on the Gospel of John, strongly confesses that Jesus was fully “flesh,” fully human. This is one of the most hopeful confessions I can think of. He walked our path, experienced our afflictions, was challenged by evil as we are. Yet he was sinless, assuring us that sin is not intrinsic to who we are. We can’t sin and say, “After all, I’m just human.”

Deny the “flesh” nature of Jesus and you have denied Jesus. Your thinking puts you outside the Christian camp. Nor should we diminish (without denying) Jesus’ full humanity. He didn’t walk an inch off the ground. He has been tested just like we are and thus he comes to us with understanding and grace.

Here’s a very practical application of Jesus’ real humanity. I strongly believe that pastors must be “flesh and blood” in close company with their people. We must strive for “incarnational ministry.” We are not to be larger-than-life figures on a screen, remote and out of reach, and above what afflicts others. This has great implications on how we “do church.” Technology has made remote worship possible during Covid and for other good reasons. But I’m happy to hear of trends away from overreliance on “remote worship” and back toward in-person fellowship and pastoral ministry.

No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father’s side, he has made him known. (John 1:18)

One more key answer to “who is Jesus?” is found in verse eighteen. While God is not directly visible, Jesus was. We can know him and thereby know God.

This little look at the Gospel of John’s “Christmas message” has just scratched the surface. I’m adding some more in-depth teachings below. Please take the “key points” to heart and celebrate Christmas in light of them.

What songs highlight the themes I’ve shared? Here are three:

Veiled in flesh the Godhead see; Hail th’incarnate Deity,
Pleased as man with us to dwell, Jesus our Emmanuel.

Hail the heaven-born Prince of Peace! Hail the Sun of Righteousness!
Light and life to all he brings, risen with healing in his wings.
Mild he laid his glory by, born that we no more may die.
– Charles Wesley, 1739

Of the Father’s love begotten, ere the worlds began to be,
He is Alpha and Omega, he the source, the ending he,
of the things that are, that have been, and that future years shall see…
– Marcus Aurelius Clemens Prudentius, 4th century

O Word of God incarnate, O Wisdom from on high,
O Truth unchanged, unchanging, O Light of our dark sky.
– William How, 1867

Papyrus Papyrus 66 may date as early as the early second century. It contains most of the Gospel of John. This page contains John 1:1-13 and part of verse 14.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

A Deeper Look at the Prologue of John’s Gospel (1:1-18)

The Prologue whets our palate with appetizers about what will be unfolded throughout this letter by the teachings and deeds of Jesus. The letter reaches its pinnacle in chapter 20, when Jesus presents himself to the “I won’t believe what I can’t see and feel” disciple Thomas. Upon seeing Jesus and being invited by Jesus to touch his wounds (from his crucifixion), Thomas exclaims “My Lord and my God!” In essence, Thomas confesses what the Prologue declares: Jesus is the Word which is God and which has become flesh.

Jesus sets forth the evangelistic goal of this Gospel with these words to Thomas: “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed” (John 20:28-29). This is followed by John’s comment (quoted above) that his written record of Jesus intends to induce faith in his readers.

John 1:1 – “In the beginning…” (en archē) is identical to how Genesis 1:1 begins in the Greek scriptures used by first-century Christians. This may correlate the two “beginnings” but I’m not dogmatic on this.

“…was the Word” (ēn ho logos). This term logos is rich in Greek and Jewish thought. Jewish thought saw the “word” of God as the originator of creation (“By the word of the Lord the heavens were made” – Psalm 33:6). Here the word is active, not simply thoughtful. God’s speech launched his creation (Genesis 1:3). And in John 1:3 Jesus, the Word, creates all that is made. Several words unfold this term: “reason, revelation, expression, communication, disclosure” and more. It’s best to see John as using a term with familiar backgrounds but giving it a fulfillment unique to his letter. Oscar Cullmann traces the different uses of logos in the ancient world but insists, “we must ask especially to what extent Christianity introduced completely new elements and freshly interpreted the Logos concept…the one revelation of God in Jesus of Nazareth” thereby reforming how logos is to be understood. John is “proclaiming something radically new” regardless of what logos meant to contemporaries (“The Greeks spoke of the Logos without knowing him; they did not speak of the Logos who became flesh.”).

I find Robert Gundry quite cleaver as he ponders the trendy but artificial distinction that says Christianity is about a Person, not about propositions. To the slogan “Truth is personal, not propositional” (as though personal cancels out the propositional), he entertains the “naughty thought” of translating logos as “the Proposition” (unfolded in John’s discourses).

John 1:1 conveys three phrases that unfold who/what the logos is. In addition to his timeless existence prior to creation (the first phrase):
• “…and the Word was with God…” (kai ho logos ēn pros ton theon). In essence, the word was “face to face” with God in perfect harmony, thereby fully knowing what is to be known about God. We might say, “From the beginning God and his Word were constantly together.” No person or thing can convey the Father to us better than Jesus, his Word.
• “…and the Word was God” (kai theos ēn ho logos). The Word is both “with God” and “is God.” Cullmann insists, “We must allow this paradox of all Christianity to stand. The New Testament does not resolve it, but sets the two statements alongside each other…”

Notice what John doesn’t say: (1) he doesn’t say Jesus is “like” God, as many moderns express this relationship. John had the word theios (“God-like, divine”) available if he wanted to say this. (2) He doesn’t say Jesus is congruent with God (as if John had used two definite articles to say, “and the Word was the God” [kai ho logos ēn ho theos]), thereby creating an incompatible contradiction with “the Word was with God” and essentially affirming a Jesus-unitarianism. (3) He doesn’t say “the Word was a god” (kai ho logos ēn theos). The indefinite article “a” is completely unnecessary here and reveals a bias against identifying the Logos with God (in the late 1970’s I had lengthy discussions with Jehovah’s Witnesses on this point).

John says, “And GOD was the Word” (my emphasis, which is what I think the phrase intends). The positioning of “God” as a predicate nominative before the verb makes the word definite (even without the definite article) rather than qualitative or indefinite (“a god”). John’s confession of Jesus’ deity corresponds to the Apostle Paul’s in the “Praise Chorus” of Philippians 2:6-11 and in Colossians 1:15-17 and 2:9. In Paul’s (congregational?) song, Jesus is “in very nature” God (en morphē theou)—whatever we postulate about God is also true about Jesus.

John 1:14 – “The word became flesh and made his dwelling among us.” This confesses full humanity (“flesh” and all that conveys). Jesus is not a divine spirit in a human body (Cerintian Gnosticism) nor does he simply appear human (Docetism). He is fully human and a denial of this is a denial of Christianity. “Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God” (1 John 4:2) and “Many deceivers who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh have gone out into the world” (2 John 7).

John 1:18 – “No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only (monogenēs theos), who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.” No mortal has seen God in his fullness as the Word has seen him, yet God gave glimpses of his glory (Exodus 33:18-23).

The reading “God the One and Only” differs from “the only begotten son” (ho monogenēs huios, cf. John 3:16) in the Greek manuscripts. I’m not a textual criticism expert. While the reading “only begotten God” seems preferable in textual support, I do think the common (KJV) rendering “son” fits John’s Prologue better. By either rendering, the key point is that Jesus, and only Jesus, is in the Father’s bosom and has plumbed the depths (exēgēsato, “exegeted”) of who the Father is.

Sources: G. R. Beasley-Murray, John (vol. 36 of Word Biblical Commentary), pp. 1-16; Oscar Cullmann, The Christology of the New Testament, pp. 149-69; Robert Gundry, Jesus the Word according to John the Sectarian, pp. xiii-xvii, 8-11; Bernard L. Ramm, An Evangelical Christology [recommended], pp. 37-52; Andreas J. Köstenberger, John (vol. 2 in Zondervan Illustrated Bible Background Commentary), pp. 5-13; Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. 4, pp. 127-34; Donald Shoemaker, class lecture notes for “God, Christ, and Holy Spirit,” Biola University.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Religious Liberty Vigilance –

Bill of Rights 21 “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”

– Thomas Jefferson’s Letter to Danbury Baptists (1802)

I attended public schools in the 1960’s. They were good places of instruction. About that time, my church began a Christian elementary school. If I recall that era correctly, it wasn’t that many Christians thought the schools were doing or teaching bad things (evolution excepted) back then, but they wanted an educational experience permeated by Christian themes and values.

“Christian” education was never just about “add-ons,” like putting a cross on the wall or having a chapel service or a Bible class that would have “spiritual” words while regular classes had “secular” words to share.
No, spiritual instruction soaked into every aspect of education, from A to Z.

This meant that all teachers, counselors and coaches—yes, even the custodians—would embrace the faith that the school confessed. Teachers were expected to TRAIN students as well as TEACH them. All employees were to MODEL the faith before students as they had opportunity. Indeed, parents expected this when they laid out lots of cash for their children to attend. Christian schools didn’t look to the government for funding and certainly not for control of the Christian philosophy of education at work.

Well, along comes a form of government activism that won’t leave religious schools alone. It says that religious schools don’t have the right to hire and retain teachers and employees who confess and practice the faith. Only “ministerial” jobs are exempt. Presumably, other positions are “secular non-religious positions” even if the schools say they are not.
Examples of intrusions into religious liberty that require vigilance:
• Legislation that removes the right of religious institutions to set standards of belief and conduct for their employees (example: AB 569 [2017] in California that was vetoed by then-Gov. Jerry Brown).
• Legal challenges by workers at religious organizations who claim employment discrimination because they were dismissed over issues of belief or conduct.
• Government regulations or other edicts (even what bathroom signs must say) that limit the free exercise right of religious organizations to set standards of operation based on religious beliefs.

Christian citizens (and others who value religious liberty) must not take this lying down. And it’s not enough just to pray about it. Remember Nehemiah’s resolve: “We prayed to our God and posted a guard…to meet the threat”
– Nehemiah 4:9).

Jefferson’s metaphor of a “Wall of Separation between Church and State” was his way of explaining the intention of the First Amendment. That wall today needs more bricks at the top—not to keep the church from addressing the state, but to keep the state from intruding into the realm of the church.

Ephesians [/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

“In Hoc Anno Domini”
(From The Wall Street Journal. This editorial was written in 1949 by the late
Vermont Royster and has been published annually ever since.)

When Saul of Tarsus set out on his journey to Damascus the whole of the known world lay in bondage. There was one state, and it was Rome. There was one master for it all, and he was Tiberius Caesar.

Everywhere there was civil order, for the arm of the Roman law was long. Everywhere there was stability, in government and in society, for the centurions saw that it was so.

But everywhere there was something else, too. There was oppression—for those who were not the friends of Tiberius Caesar. There was the tax gatherer to take the grain from the fields and the flax from the spindle to feed the legions or to fill the hungry treasury from which divine Caesar gave largess to the people.

There was the impressor to find recruits for the circuses. There were executioners to quiet those whom the Emperor proscribed. What was a man for but to serve Caesar?

There was the persecution of men who dared think differently, who heard strange voices or read strange manuscripts. There was enslavement of men whose tribes came not from Rome, disdain for those who did not have the familiar visage.

And most of all, there was everywhere a contempt for human life. What, to the strong, was one man more or less in a crowded world?

Then, of a sudden, there was a light in the world, and a man from Galilee saying, “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s and unto God the things that are God’s.”

And the voice from Galilee, which would defy Caesar, offered a new Kingdom in which each man could walk upright and bow to none but his God. Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. And he sent this gospel of the Kingdom of Man into the uttermost ends of the earth.

So the light came into the world and the men who lived in darkness were afraid, and they tried to lower a curtain so that man would still believe salvation lay with the leaders.

But it came to pass for a while in divers places that the truth did set man free, although the men of darkness were offended and they tried to put out the light. The voice said, “Haste ye. Walk while you have the light, lest darkness come upon you, for he that walketh in darkness knoweth not whither he goeth.”

Along the road to Damascus the light shone brightly. But afterward Paul of Tarsus, too, was sore afraid. He feared that other Caesars, other prophets, might one day persuade men that man was nothing save a servant unto them, that men might yield up their birthright from God for pottage and walk no more in freedom.

Then might it come to pass that darkness would settle again over the lands and there would be a burning of books and men would think only of what they should eat and what they should wear, and would give heed only to new Caesars and to false prophets.

Then might it come to pass that men would not look upward to see even a winter’s star in the East, and once more, there would be no light at all in the darkness.

And so Paul, the apostle of the Son of Man, spoke to his brethren, the Galatians, the words he would have us remember afterward in each of the years of his Lord:

“Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free
and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

My Tribute to a Dedicated Pastor

My colleague and friend in the ministry Pastor Greg Howell passed away of Covid on November 21. For 40 years he was the faithful pastor of the Grace Brethren Church in Goldendale, Washington. His congregation of around 100 was a strong medium-sized church for a community of 3,500. I spoke there once over 20 years ago and I was impressed with the people and the well-appointed facility so conducive to worship. I was also impressed with Pastor Greg’s reputation for good in his community, which held him in high esteem. He also served many of our denominational ministries with dedication and care.

He personified biblical qualities for a good shepherd of the flock entrusted to him by God (1 Timothy 1:7; 1 Peter 5: 1-3). It must have been easy and joyful for his congregation to follow the scripture, “Obey your leaders and submit to their authority… They keep watch over you… Obey them so their work will be a joy and not a burden…” (Hebrews 13:17). Indeed, “When the Chief Shepherd appears, [he] will receive the crown of glory” I am sure (1 Peter 5:4).[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]And finally once again—from December, 2018
This was the best humor of the season. A Christmas cookie display in a Corona, CA supermarket—picture taken by our daughter. Sorry, Santa!

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

Don has been a member of the clergy in the Long Beach, California area since 1970. He now serves as Pastor Emeritus of Grace Community Church of Seal Beach (where he was senior pastor 1984-2012) and as Senior Chaplain of the Seal Beach Police Department (2001+). He previously was an assistant professor of Biblical Studies at Biola University (1976-84) and chaired the Social Concerns Committee in the Fellowship of Grace Brethren Churches from 1985 to 2019. His graduate work includes a Master of Divinity from Grace Theological Seminary, a Master of Theology from Fuller Theological Seminary with a concentration in Christian ethics, and a Doctor of Ministry from American Baptist Seminary of the West (now Berkeley School of Theology) with a concentration on the Charismatic Movement. His law school studies included a course on the First Amendment. He and his wife Mary have been married for 55 years. They have two children and six grandchildren.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

November 2021 Newsletter

Posted on November 1, 2021 by admin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”949″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_custom_heading text=”“A Piece of My Mind”” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:50px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”November 2021 Newsletter” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:30px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

October 12, 2021

10-Year Remembrance of the “Salon Massacre” in Seal Beach (CA) drew 250 who recalled the loss of eight lives

[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Salon Massacre Why, O Lord, do you stand far off?
Why do you hide yourself in times of trouble?

In his arrogance the evil man hunts down the weak.
From ambush he murders the innocent.

Arise, Lord! Lift up your hand, O God.
Do not forget the helpless.

But you, O God, do see trouble and grief;
The victim commits himself to you.
You are the helper of the fatherless. – Psalm 10 (excerpts)

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

This Thanksgiving, Give Thanks that You Live in America!

(NOTE: This Independence Day message from Milia Islam-Majeed, Executive Director of the South Coast Interfaith Council, is a wonderful word of Thanksgiving—very appropriate for Thanksgiving Day.
I share it with her permission. The picture dates back to 2008, when the SCIC recognized me for my efforts on behalf of religious liberty.)

“I pray that you had a joyous July 4th! This day of celebration holds such a special meaning to so many, including my family. My parents migrated to America over 30 years ago during the month of July to achieve the American dream. Indeed, it was this great nation that afforded them the opportunity to do so.

“Like so many first generation immigrants, they left their native land of Bangladesh to build a better and more prosperous future for their children – my brother and I. They wanted to ensure that we obtained the best possible education and, with it, serve the greater community. Starting their lives completely over, I witnessed the hardships that many immigrants face as my father – a decorated army colonel – worked to build his eyeglass business during the day only to go to McDonalds at night to work the graveyard shift while my mother – an aspiring zoologist in Bangladesh – worked in the shoe factory sewing soles on to children’s shoes so as to support our family.

“The years of hard work and sacrifice that my parents made – and the infinite blessings of God first and foremost – resulted in the privilege of my older brother becoming a physician and me being able to serve you as the Executive Director of this interfaith council that I love so deeply. This dream of my parents could not have actualized without the countless number of people who went from becoming strangers to friends and, ultimately, like family.

“Along this journey, we became citizens of this country and understood first hand the gift of having the right to vote and, by doing so, contributing to the story of America. To this day, we remain indebted to so many who came before us and fought for the freedoms that we continue to enjoy today.

“One thing I am continuously reminded of is something that my father told us after we took the oath to become American citizens. He stated, ‘Always remember that with this great privilege comes a great responsibility to be of service to this country and ensure others are given this same right. We are stronger when all people – no matter who they are or what they look like – are granted an opportunity to succeed.’

“Certainly no nation is perfect, but there’s no place else that I would rather live for this is home.”

With gratitude and in friendship,
Milia Islam-Majeed
South Coast Interfaith Council Executive Director

Inspired Thanksgiving

(Giving Thanks the “Bible Way”)

I urge that…thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way. This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior.
– 1 Timothy 2:1-3 (thanks and prayers for those in authority over us)

But thanks be to God, that you who were once slaves of sin have become obedient from the heart to the standard of teaching to which you were committed. – Romans 6:17

But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
– 1 Corinthians 15:57 (the victory of resurrection to eternal life)

Everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving. – 1 Timothy 4:4 (thanks for what we chose to eat or drink)

Give thanks in all circumstances; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you.
– 1 Thessalonians 5:13

Thanks be to God for his inexpressible gift! – 2 Corinthians 9:15
(the gift of Jesus to us)

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Religious Liberty Vigilance –

Bill of Rights 21 I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”
– Thomas Jefferson’s Letter to Danbury Baptists (1802)

Breaking the Law and Corrupting the Gospel

(How Vice-President Kamala Harris causes churches to break the law)

For decades I have counseled and criticized churches over bringing partisan politics into their gatherings. In most cases these have been theologically conservative churches where most congregants are also politically conservative.

Christians who claim their spiritual message is “Bible-grounded” should be strongly determined to keep the message of their churches free of the “leaven” of politics. So why do so many of these churches engage in it?

Then there is the legal issue. When a church supports or opposes a candidate for political offices, it breaks the law. Whether that law should exist is a different question, but it is on the books for now.

The same restriction against conservative politicking also applies to churches with liberal or leftist politics. So why will a video of Kamala Harris be shown in hundreds of churches in Virginia before people vote for governor?

I watched the video. If, as intended, it is shown in churches, it is clearly illegal. “I believe that my friend Terry McAuliffe is the leader Virginia needs at this moment,” the vice-president says in the video. “Terry McAuliffe has a long track record of getting things done for the people of Virginia.”
Ms. Harris should know this is illegal, or if not her lawyers should tell her so.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State, an organization with which I share little in common, said this about the Harris video:

In the video, Harris clearly endorses McAuliffe, remarking, “Elect Terry McAuliffe as your next governor.”

Virginia’s religious leaders should keep that video at arm’s length, lest they violate a federal law dating to 1954 called the Johnson Amendment. The provision ensures tax-exempt nonprofit groups, including houses of worship, do not intervene in partisan elections by endorsing or opposing candidates for public office.

–Rob Boston, “Partisan Politics Doesn’t Belong in Houses of Worship,” (blog on website of Americans United, October 20, 2021) [BOLD mine]

Whether we hold left-wing or right-wing or centrist politics, let’s obey the law and keep our politics outside the “church house doors” and (even more importantly) stay on-message with the Gospel of Jesus.

Thomas Jefferson [/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

School Message of the Month
Dishonest Christian
School Teachers

Shouldn’t teachers be good on their word? Especially Christian teachers?

Psalm 15 asks the question “Who shall dwell on God’s holy hill?”
Answer: “[The one who] swears to his own hurt and does not change.”

God honors the person who keeps his word even when the outcome is not as desirable as it would be if he were to break his word.

“Pay what you vow. It is better that you should not vow than that you should vow and not pay. Let not your mouth lead you into sin” (Ecclesiastes 5:4-6).

“All you need to say is ‘yes’ or ‘no.’” – Jesus (Matthew 5:37)

First let me stipulate a couple of facts:
1. Teachers in parochial (religious) schools earn less than they could earn teaching in public schools. Sometimes considerably so. Thus, they make a sacrifice for what they believe.
2. Many public school districts are having a hard time filling teaching positions in light of Covid.

So there are situations where public school administrators have made appealing offers to teachers who teach in parochial schools. And some teachers have accepted these offers.

That in itself is not a fault. If anything, it should prod the governing body of a parochial school (a church, perhaps) to raise salaries and benefits. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” is a biblical principle still in force today, and it applies to so-called “Christian service” as much as to “secular” jobs.

The issue is this: if someone freely signs a contract offered in good faith, that signature is binding in the presence of God and before people. One does not break it simply because the grass is greener on the other side of the fence.

When I taught at a Christian university, every March (or so) the faculty would get contracts for the following academic year. By signing it, you were assured of a paycheck for that academic year and the school was assured of your classroom services and your presence on a stable, dependable faculty.
Win-win. If you “blew it” and were dismissed “for cause”, that’s an exception. Otherwise, the contract was binding both ways.

A teacher receiving a better offer may go to his or her administration and ask for a release. It may be granted, even if it puts the school in a bind (which, it seems to me, is one reason why it is unethical on the part of the teacher to seek a release except for compelling reasons). The religious school probably won’t enforce the contract by legal action, but this doesn’t excuse the teacher.
The general principle remains clear: you keep your word, even if it hurts.

Some may argue that bringing a Christian educator into a public school is a plus for the ethical fiber of that school. I would agree. But this assumes the transition into the new school system was honorable in the first place.

Teachers at Christian schools should be paragons of honest dealings—examples to the youth they train as well as teach.

Perhaps the compelling need for honest dealings is one reason the Bible says, “Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness” (James 3:1). The verse is certainly talking about teachers within the Christian community, and that would include parochial teachers.

Teacher I have honored teachers for decades. When I was an active pastor, I would take time in worship services to honor and pray for teachers when a new school year would get underway.
I published a column “Beatitudes for Teachers” which uplifted them, especially when they served under stress.

Thus, I’m doubly disappointed whenever the teaching profession dishonors itself in any way.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

And what you don’t say can be as significant as what you do say. Shortly after “9/11” American flags could be seen up and down the street. But the neighbors directly across put no flag out. They were a radical leftist couple—so devoted to their causes that they would fly across the country to protest or support this or that.

Someone put a note on their door accusing them of a lack of patriotism for not putting out a flag after “9/11”. The wife told me about it almost in tears.
I contacted the local newspaper and was able to get a columnist to write about what happened and the narrowness it displayed.

On the personal level we had no conflict with our leftist neighbors. I support freedom of speech, including the right not to speak—in this case, not to put out an American flag. (I wish more leftists would support free speech.)

I considered talking about some of the lines on these signs. I’ll bite my lip and not do that. Instead, I’ll make some overall observations. Well, OK, I will talk about the phrases “We Believe…Science is Real.” Ouch! I just bit my lip!

First, our neighborhood was built in the 1950’s and is a fairly stable, well-maintained neighborhood. One might expect our neighbors to be like one another in their social/political opinions, but instead they are diverse.

Second, I thought it was rather conservative on social issues, but the amount of “left of center” signage would say otherwise. Not only is the neighborhood more diverse than expected, it has more liberals and leftists than expected.

Third, it seems like a tolerant neighborhood. I have not heard any argumentation or seen any nasty signs indicating that political antagonism trumps neighborliness. This is good. (Our former radical leftist neighbors may have been an exception to this.)

So, “tolerance, diversity, inclusion” – we’ve got it all and the signs to prove it. And we have good block parties. So far nobody has bragged, as a leftist Seattle city council member did, that they have no Republican friends!

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Want to Buy Someone a Bible for Christmas? Which Bible Should You Buy?

The New International Version is at the top of the popularity list, as it has been for many years. It is excellent.

The King James Version, which will never leave the “top 10,” continues in second place. It seems unbeatable for its elegant English, even if it often sounds archaic to us. After all, it was produced in 1611!

Also on the list is the very readable English Standard Version.

If you are considering the ESV, why not go even better and give the ESV Study Bible? It has contributions by a large number of recognized scholars, including J. I. Packer and Wayne Grudem (I prefer a study Bible created by many scholars rather than by a single writer). And now a more compact
ESV Concise Study Bible has been released. An excellent study Bible gives you the Scriptures plus a good variety of study helps all in one cover.

Two newcomers to the “top 10” are in Spanish: Reina-Valera, a 16th-century translation revised in 1960, and Nueva Versión Internacional (Spanish NIV). Their growing popularity reflects our changing Christian landscape.

Noticeable for its absence (compared to recent decades) is the New American Standard Bible, a very literal translation often stiff in English.

Any widely acceptable rather literal version of the Bible is trustworthy. Though it was once very popular, I have not recommended The Living Bible because it is a paraphrase that takes considerable liberty with the biblical text. It may be OK for devotional reading but not for drawing any doctrinal conclusions (even if someone should say, “I never really understood that verse until I read it in The Living Bible”).[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Colin Powell’s 13 Rules

General Powell’s “13 Rules” were originally given over the phone to a writer for Parade. They soon took on themselves a life of their own. Each point has commentary to explain, clarify and apply. (Source: Colin Powell,
It Worked for Me, Harper Perennial, 2012.)
1. It ain’t as bad as you think. It will look better in the morning.
2. Get mad, then get over it.
3. Avoid having your ego so close to your position that when your position fails, your ego goes with it.
4. It can be done.
5. Be careful what you choose: you may get it.
6. Don’t let adverse facts stand in the way of a good decision.
7. You can’t make someone else’s choices. You shouldn’t let someone else make yours.
8. Check small things.
9. Share credit.
10. Remain calm. Be kind.
11. Have a vision. Be demanding.
12. Don’t take counsel of your fears or naysayers.
13. Perpetual optimism is a force multiplier.

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

October 2021 Newsletter

Posted on September 30, 2021 by admin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”949″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_custom_heading text=”“A Piece of My Mind”” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:50px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”October 2021 Newsletter” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:30px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

October 12, 2011 – The Darkest Day in the History of Seal Beach, California

[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”1682″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]

October 12 marks 10 years from the date when eight people were murdered over a child custody dispute.

It was the worst mass killing in Orange County history. It still touches many lives in Seal Beach, including my own.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_custom_heading text=”Support
Emergency
Dispatchers” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:45|text_align:left|color:%231e73be”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”1684″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Dispatchers – The Hidden Asset

By Donald Shoemaker

A 911 call is answered by a police dispatcher. The caller is threatening to take his own life. The trained dispatcher does her very best to calm and bring helpful resources to the person. Then a gunshot is heard and there is silence.

This is the real world of emergency dispatchers. On October 12, 2011 a massacre occurred in Seal Beach, California. Eight people were murdered and one wounded at a salon over a child custody dispute. The event shattered the tranquility of this idyllic beach community. It was the worst mass murder in the history of Orange County.

Those who were on the scene, as I was for many hours, remember the police and fire personnel from many agencies, the Mobile Command Post, the helicopters, the news media, the local library turned into the Family Assistance Center, the professional counselors and chaplains, the Red Cross. But what about the dispatchers who played such a vital role?

West Cities Police Communications (“West-Comm”) serves the dispatch needs of three communities—Cypress and Los Alamitos and Seal Beach. It receives about 3000 calls a week, of which about 600 are “911” calls.

Dispatchers undergo significant training prior to assuming their role, plus on-the-job training. They must demonstrate calmness under pressure, control of emotions, empathy and compassion, and decisiveness. I respect their ability to be so excellent at multi-tasking. I say this as a pianist who can’t play the piano and carry on a conversation at the same time.

Lead Dispatcher Marie Pope says, “Our job can be stressful. We typically take many calls, deal with stressful situations and must endure the pressure of responding quickly and calmly in life-threatening situations. Since we can’t see what is happening, we completely rely on the caller to give us detailed information to complete our calls for service. We ask specific questions to get the information out to the officers as quickly as possible while keeping in mind their safety. Many calls emotionally affect us, but with our job we have to keep going.” Marie coordinates a trained peer support team available to dispatchers as they deal with some of the calls and incidents they handle.

The massacre of 10/12/11 would weigh heavily on West-Comm and is still vivid as the tenth anniversary of the tragedy approaches.

October 12 was an ordinary day in a calm community. Dispatchers were eating their lunches at their workstations and conversing between calls.

Eight Slain All that changed as the 911 calls flooded in. There was an active shooter at a community salon. Several calls were forwarded from the highway patrol (in those days calls to 911 from cell phones often went to the CHP first). People reported “shots fired.” “With only four dispatchers in the room and one of them working the radio—it was chaos, with a lot of calls and trying to determine what was really going on,” a dispatcher told me.

Marie said, “Our dispatch center assisted the officers with maintaining the crime scenes via the radio by calling for mutual aid and calling in additional personnel to assist, in addition to several other requests from the field personnel. Our job did not stop…we still had calls for service to handle and 911 calls coming in… all while managing our own emotions as to what just occurred. I personally checked on each dispatcher individually and made sure they were OK and able to finish out the day.”
The priority goal of the dispatchers was to get the bad guy. A dispatcher said, “We were able to get officers there and put out a description of the suspect and suspect vehicle so that the officers were able to find him and catch him. In those moments when the call is going on, you become very task oriented.”

(I can add that, with the help of witnesses, the first police responder was able to pursue the suspect vehicle and stop it just a couple of blocks past the church where I served as pastor—a short pursuit that ended with a nonviolent surrender.)

Among the first 911 callers was an employee of the salon who had locked herself in an office. “She was so scared, but she was able to provide good information on what took place inside the salon. She thought the suspect was still inside and feared for her life, but it turned out to be one of our officers that was there to save her. Just being on the phone with her during all her emotions will stay with me.”

The dispatcher continued, “Dispatching is a hard profession. We have many ‘highs’ and ‘lows’ in this job… I have learned to process and then compartmentalize the calls I deal with. Many of us are mothers, wives, sisters, etc., and you have to be able to go home to those you love, and often take care of them. Over the years I have learned to rely on my faith.”

“We did our best that day. Unfortunately, we could not stop what occurred inside the salon, but I like to think with our hard work at trying to get the information on the shooter and his vehicle out to the officers while dealing with all the hectic calls coming in made a difference. Due to the EXCELLENT police work of the officers responding to that call—they were able to stop and arrest the shooter before he was able to hurt anyone else.”

“I pray for all the people and the families that were affected on 10/12/11 – it was evil that came into our city and those people’s lives that day. As dispatchers, we played a small but critical part in helping that day, and the officers working that day are the true heroes.”

(NOTE: I could not have prepared this article without the support of the Director of West-Comm operations and the assistance of Marie Pope, Lead Dispatcher for West-Comm. I also was assisted by a dispatcher who chose to be anonymous. Quotes by Marie are identified as hers. Other quotes are from the anonymous dispatcher.)[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]

Religious Liberty Vigilance –
Limiting Government’s “Reach” to Preserve Religious Liberty and other 1st Amendment Rights

Bill of Rights 21 “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” – 1st Amendment

A strong limitation of government powers is a key to protect religion, free speech and other rights. That’s why we have the Bill of Rights.

Three Covid-related developments have affected limited government—two for the good, one for the bad.

CALIFORNIA – Rules by the governor and local governments intended to prevent the spread of Covid were often unfair to religious gatherings, restricting them more than similar activities. Just look at the recent Emmy Awards event—600 attendees without masks. How so? The LA County Department of Health regarded those attending the event to be “performers” and thus exempt from the mask requirement.

Once a government body exempts this and that activity from its rules, the limits it imposes on religious gatherings must be judged by the highest scrutiny. By this standard, government usually loses.

And government—state and local—lost big in its efforts to punish* Grace Community Church of Sun Valley, John MacArthur—pastor, which resumed its worship services last year in spite of orders not to do so and threat of fines. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health and the State of California have EACH settled with the church for $400,000. The money will go to the Thomas More Society, which represented the church.
FLORIDA – A circuit court judge ruled that Governor Ron DeSantis exceeded his legal authority when he issued an executive order blocking local school boards from ordering mask wearing.

Now, many have claimed this decision undercuts parental authority. I understand the concern. But what it really does is undercut a governor’s attempt to decide what local school boards should have the duty to decide.

Governors of our several states have broad authority to act in an emergency. But this indefinite “emergency” has gone on for 19 months now. If state lawmakers want to cede this power to the governors, let them do so by explicit and limited legislation, not by acquiescing to an open-ended use of “emergency powers.”

I live under Governor Newsom’s activist emergency powers (in California).
So I appreciate it when a court sets limits to what governors can order.

THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL – Where did the CDC ever get the authority to ban evictions of tenants from rental properties? Doesn’t this authority seem to fall outside the realm of “disease control”?

A law known as the “Public Health Service Act” (section 361) granted power to the CDC for “inspection, fumigation, disinfection, sanitation… and other measures…” that carry out and enforce regulations the Surgeon General decides are needed to prevent the spread of communicable diseases.

The operative phrase is “and other measures”. Taken to the “nth degree”
it turns the CDC into a dictatorship. This reminds us how governmental bodies and officials can twist language to give themselves power. Its practice (or possibility) should lead all freedom-loving Americans to high vigilance.

Reasonably understood, “and other measures” would be “other measures of the same sort” as sanitation, etc. The phase doesn’t create boundless authority. I say this without expressing an opinion on eviction control itself, which needs to be approved or disallowed by judging its merits, and certainly needs to be installed by legislation, not by some agency’s decree.

* Los Angeles County’s punishment of Grace Community Church included cancelling a decades-long lease of a parking lot owned by the county. This action has been rescinded.[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Covid19 Vaccination Update

Not all agreed with my midsummer appeal “Get Vaccinated!” to put it mildly.

“With few exceptions, it’s time for Americans to get vaccinated.”

What might these exceptions be?

Medical Exceptions, about which I claim no expertise.
Religious Exceptions, for which I do claim expertise.
• Secularists who scorn religious exemptions should not be allowed to dominate this debate or ignore religious freedom principles.
• Members of various faith groups need to learn and utilize their own group’s teachings on vaccinations.
• Some sub-groups within Christianity promote an emphasis on divine healing. Most of these leave room for medical means. A few do not.
• I cannot think of any strong biblical argument against vaccinations per se. (Scripture passages like 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 refer to allowing our bodies to be used for immoral purposes, like drunkenness, gluttony and fornication.)
• Some have argued that fetal tissue from abortions is used to develop a vaccine. I have not found this a convincing argument for an exemption.
• An individual whose Christian sub-group opposes vaccination as a matter of doctrine needs to articulate and support that opposition with documentation and prove that he/she is a member of the group.
• Individuals whose denomination or local church do not take a position against vaccination (and this would be many, including me) would need to argue their position for themselves, linking their position to scripture or Christian teaching. You are on your own! You need to articulate in writing how your understanding of the Christian faith supports your conclusion about vaccination. I have heard of cases where your declaration alone would suffice, but you should expect to have to defend your view and be prepared for pushback.
• Be sure to consider the impact on your work or ministry or relationships that may occur from your decision not to be vaccinated.

Both of the above—Medical and Religious Exceptions—are the “few exceptions” I have in mind in my “bottom line.” Otherwise…

“Get Vaccinated!”

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Bible Insight – A Practical Look at Creation
Based on the First Creation Account (Genesis 1:1 – 2:3)

I love the “Big Outdoors.” So I love the great “creation” texts in the Bible (the first two chapters of Genesis, Psalm 19, Psalm 104 and more). And I love the great hymns that reflect God’s handiwork in creation.

Having climbed Mt. Whitney (14,505’) and the tall peaks in Southern California, I can relate to the words of “How Great Thou Art!” –“When I look down from lofty mountain grandeur…” And I love to sing “All Creatures of Our God and King,” with words from St. Francis of Assisi (1225 AD).

Here I give a survey of the opening words of Genesis—the seven days of creation (using the New International Version). May they bless and benefit!

Genesis 1:1 – “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”

The alternate explanation is this: The emergence of the earth and heavens was an unsuperintended product of time, energy, matter and chance. If this explanation is true, nothing in the Bible matters. There is no transcendent basis for morality. But if Genesis 1:1 is true, the rest of the Bible is commentary on living out the meaning and purpose of God’s creation.

Genesis 1:2 – “Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.”

It’s too early in scripture to take God’s spirit (ruach Elohim) as a reference to the Holy Spirit of the New Testament. This is God’s breath, his powerful force for change, going forth. God intends to bring order out of chaos. And I’m delighted to say he is still in that business—bringing order into the chaos of our lives and human institutions if we are open to him. In fact, the rest of the book of Genesis finds God blessing dysfunctional people and families and bringing order out of their chaos. When I think of this, I think of the chorus:

Something beautiful, something good;
All my confusion he understood.
All I had to offer him was brokenness and strife,
But he made something beautiful of my life.

Genesis 1:3-4 – “And God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light. God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness.”

Now we get to the six days of creation. God begins with light. As with the rest of God’s creative acts, the light God created was good. In the New Testament, God brings light through Jesus, the true “light of the world” (John 1:1-9).

Genesis 1:6-8 – “And God said, ‘Let there be an expanse between the waters to separate water from water.’ So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. And it was so. God called the expanse ‘sky.’”

Commonly called “the expanse” or “the firmament”, the sky separates the waters below (which God gathered into “seas” so that dry land could appear—v. 9) from the waters above, which we call the clouds. As I write, clouds have moved in from the mountains to the north and the blue sky of the morning has been replaced by them—all this in “the expanse”. No rain, unfortunately.

This is the language of appearance—how things appear to us. It is not the language of science. This is a hot debate, but I’m convinced that many scripture passages are written from the standpoint of how things appear to us and if we read science into them we are introducing a foreign element that won’t work. See, for example, Psalm 19:4-6 – “In the heavens he has pitched a tent for the sun, which is like a bridegroom coming forth from his pavilion, like a champion rejoicing to run his course. It rises at one end of the heavens and makes its circuit to the other…” It is wrong to read a geocentric poetic scripture like Psalm 19 as the language of science (as Henry Morris does in “The Scientific Accuracy of the Psalms”) instead of the language of appearance.

According to the language of appearance, God set the sun and moon and stars in this expanse/firmament as well. Again, this is as we view things and not astronomy, which would put them far above the expanse above the earth.

This “expanse”, by the way, is still there along with the water above it. I can look up at night and see the Moon and Venus and Jupiter in it.
Psalm 148:3-5 – “Praise him, sun and moon, praise him, all you shining stars. Praise him, you highest heavens and you waters above the skies…for he commanded and they were created.”

Genesis 1:11-25 – The progressive sequence of life on earth is vegetation (the 3rd day), life in the water and air (the 5th day), and living creatures on the earth (the 6th day). At each step, God saw that what he created was good.

Genesis 1:26 – “Then God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, overall the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.’”

On the 6th day the highest and last of God’s creative work—humanity—was created. Only with humanity (“man”) does God consult with himself as to what he will do. Although all the creative work of God manifests his wisdom (Psalm 104:26), God’s wise thoughtfulness is underscored by this reference to God consulting within himself before he made humankind. Whether this self-consultation opens room for the Holy Trinity—I’ll leave that for others to think about.

God says two things: (1) he will make man in his own image, and (2) man will rule over the rest of living creation. Man will be God’s co-regent. It should be a rule of enjoyment, wisdom and care, not of greed and exploitation.

Genesis 1:27 –

So God created mankind in his image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.

In this poetic triad we find three declarations:
• Man is made in God’s likeness. He resembles God in certain vital ways.
• The same truth is restated by reversing the points, for emphasis.
• God created man as male and female.

The third point, if it is a reiteration like the second point, provides additional insight into what it means to be God’s image bearers. Maleness and femaleness constitute (at least in part) what it means to be in God’s image.
If, rather than a reiteration it is a new statement, the third point underscores that mankind is a duality, and both poles of this duality are image bearers. It is not the man (or the king) only who bears the image, but the woman too.

Humankind according to God’s creative order is binary. Human gender is not a fluid, subjective thing with multiple possibilities. The contemporary statement that one’s gender was assigned at birth (passive voice, apparently arbitrarily by another person) is not a biblical option.

When Jesus explained the essence of marriage (Mark 10:6-8), he combined this thought with a lesson from Genesis 2:24 – “At the beginning of creation God ‘made them male and female.’ For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.”

Genesis 1:31 – Once “man as male and female” is created, God saw that his creation was “very good” – not just “good” but “very good.” We diminish our humanity if we fail to see this distinction.

One day in “Creation Week” yet remains—the 7th day.

Genesis 2:2-3 – “By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work. Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done.”

This would become foundational for the Seventh Day as a day of rest for mankind. To put it casually, “God took a day off, and we should too!”

Jesus said, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath” (Mark 2:27). A day of rest after a week of work is for our own good. It shows we are masters of our work; work is not the master of us. It shows that while we value our work, we do not worship it. We worship God and give him glory by being his likeness in the world, being co-regents with him in the care of his creation, and by acknowledging the pattern of work and rest.

We thank God for his kindness and grace, in making us and placing us in a world that is “very good” and in giving us a pattern for work and rest.

“When I consider your heavens, the work of your fingers,
The moon and the stars, which you have set in place,
What is man that you are mindful of him…?
…You crowned him with glory and honor.”
O Lord, our Lord, how majestic is your name in all the earth! – Psalm 8:3-5, 9

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

A Good Word from Elsewhere

University Presidents and Campus Speech Controversies

Keith E. Whittington, The Volokh Conspiracy, September 9, 2021 [bold mine]

It is now a familiar pattern. A professor says something controversial, most likely in public on social media. Someone notices and tries to attract attention by attacking the professor—perhaps in good faith disagreement, perhaps not. Petitions are started. Social media posts start trending. Calls are made to university officials demanding that something be done and asking plaintively that won’t someone think of the children. The professor in question is likely to receive a spate of hate mail, both electronic and the old fashioned kind. Maybe things get serious and someone important like a donor, trustee, or politician declares that the professor should be terminated for the safety of the campus.

University presidents have a responsibility in such a situation. It should go without saying, but unfortunately it does not, that they have a responsibility to actually live up to their constitutional and contractual responsibilities and refrain from sanctioning the faculty member for saying something that someone finds controversial. They should insist that harassment and threats directed against members of the faculty will not be tolerated. Professors should at least be confident that when the mobs arrive, pitchforks in hand, that university leaders will not flinch and give in to the demands of the mob.

University presidents have a greater responsibility than just that, however, and they even more often fail to meet that greater responsibility. They have a responsibility to push back against the mob. They have a responsibility to clearly defend the core mission of the university, which is to make space for members of the campus community to explore ideas and, yes, say controversial things. Rather than standing up for freedom of thought and speech, university presidents are often tempted to avoid and deflect. They prefer to keep silent and hope the controversy goes away. They prefer to join the mob and issue their own denunciations of the thought crime and assure everyone that they themselves would never express unconventional thoughts.

University presidents have a responsibility to educate the campus community and the broader public about what it is that universities do and what it means to value freedom of thought and to tolerate dissent. When controversies over faculty speech arise, university presidents should take the opportunity to reassure the campus that academic values will be respected and to propagate a better understanding of what members of the broader public should expect from a university.

“She Being Dead Yet Speaketh”— A “Woke” Justice!

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away in 2020. A defender of abortion rights, she said this at her 1993 Senate confirmation hearing:

The decision whether or not to bear a child is central to a woman’s life, to her well-being and dignity. …When government controls that decision for her, she is being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for her own choices.

A year ago, when Justice Ginsburg died, the ACLU repeated her words. But now the “woke” version has appeared. On the anniversary of her death the ACLU twittered her famous saying this way:

The decision whether or not to bear a child is central to a [person’s] life, to [their] well-being and dignity. …When government controls that decision for [people], [they are] being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for [their] own choices.

It may seem like a small matter, but it isn’t. I would argue that a man or woman’s gender is a corollary of his or her “human-being-ness”. In eliminating this, they, men and women, are being treated as less than fully adult human beings. Furthermore, it is poor journalism to twist a quotation, even with brackets, when unnecessary for the flow of a sentence. And it looks awful!

(Important Note as of 9/29/21): The director of the ACLU has expressed regret for this alteration of Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s words. It has received some pushback from feminists and others. Regret aside, that the “woke” revision was even disseminated suggests the need for more careful review of what goes forth under this organization’s name.)[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

September 2021 Newsletter

Posted on August 30, 2021 by admin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”949″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_custom_heading text=”“A Piece of My Mind”” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:50px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”September 2021 Newsletter” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:30px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

Neither Forgotten nor Forgiven – 9/11 + 20

[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1668″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]We who can remember still do remember what happened and where we were when we first heard or saw it. 2974 died on “9/11”—including over 400 first responders. Each year more die from residual health issues.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1669″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]I’ve visited the WTC site twice—in 2002 when the ruin was still evident, then several years later to see the memorial and listen to a firefighter tearfully tell the story of that day. I also have visited the Pentagon memorial.

I pray we never forget the tragedies of that day or the lessons to be learned.

Honoring “Teacher of the Year for 2021”

Teaching has been an especially challenging profession over the past 18 months. All the turmoil over Covid and other issues must not cause us to lose sight of the many quality teachers in our school systems. Cory Alfaro is one of these. She was named “Teacher of the year for 2021” by the Los Alamitos Unified School District, which includes Seal Beach.

A Good Word from the District: “She has been with us for 23 years, teaching drama at Laurel High before moving to Oak [Middle School] to teach English and Spanish. ‘I feel blessed to have a job that is my hobby, my passion, and my life’s work all rolled into one.’ Well done, Cory!”

Cory and her family are a faithful part of Grace Community Church of Seal Beach.

Congratulations, Cory!

GOLD for Rachel Fattal and
The USA Women’s 2021 Water Polo Team

The Women’s Polo Team USA won Gold at the Olympics on August 7 by soundly defeating Spain. They have now won the Gold three times in a row—2012, 2016 and now. Rachel Fattal was also part of the 2016 team.

The Fattal Family has been connected to the Seal Beach community and to Grace Community Church for many years.

Congratulations, Rachel!

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Caring for the Birdies God Cares for…

“Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? Yet not one of them will fall to the ground outside your Father’s care… So don’t be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.” – Jesus

The ultimate lesson of Jesus’ teaching (recorded in Matthew 17:29-31) is that God will sustain us when we stand up for our faith under pressure. But there is also a lesson about comparative worth.

Jesus here teaches about the relative value of living things through the logical argument of “the lesser to the greater.” To God, the little sparrow has value and he cares for it.

Jesus said people are worth more than many sparrows—at least 5 or 6, wouldn’t you say? Just kidding! The Bible’s doctrine of creation clearly establishes a hierarchy with humanity at the top. But it also clearly teaches care of creation.
Listen to Ethel Waters sing, “His Eye is on the Sparrow, and I Know He Watches Me” at a 1975 Billy Graham Crusade: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df3P4cO4Co0

“…not one of them will fall to the ground outside your Father’s care.”

Recently we returned home from a brief errand and I saw what looked like a ball of string on the lawn. I looked closely and saw it was a bird nest that fell from our parkway tree. There were three tiny baby birds inside, clearly stressed by the fall and direct exposure to the afternoon sun. We moved them from the sunlight and found something to hold the little nest.

We put the nest as close as we could get it to where it once was, hoping momma or daddy bird would show up (they didn’t). There was no safe way for me to get the nest back up onto the high, small branches from whence it fell. After all, I have on good authority that I am worth more than three sparrows!

We went on-line and looked up care and feeding of baby birds. Sadly, two of the birds didn’t make it. But one is hearty and growing and chirpy.

We’ve also protected and released 49 Monarch butterflies this year, with many more on the way. What’s next? Will we find some abandoned baby skunks in our back yard needing some TLC?[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Bible Insight – The Priority of
the Word of God

Faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ. – Romans 10:17 ESV

…when you received the word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as a human word, but as it actually is, the word of God, which is indeed at work in you who believe. – 1 Thessalonians 2:13 NIV

Preach the word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke and encourage—with great patience and careful instruction. – 2 Timothy 4:2 NIV

Perhaps some of my Catholic friends who read these words can provide me with some insight on the questions I’m about to raise.

When I was in seminary (1966-69) John MacArthur was becoming the model of preaching, the man to emulate. He had long, in-depth sermons and, besides, most of us were already used to 45-minute sermons. MacArthur, now in his 80’s, continues to deliver lengthy sermons expounding the text of Scripture to a packed sanctuary.

Problem was and still is, most of us preachers can’t preach like MacArthur and if we think 45-minute sermons are what we should deliver, we may be thinking more highly of ourselves than we ought to think (Romans 12:3).

I gave 45-minute sermons for seven years after seminary. When I returned to pastoral ministry in 1984 after eight years of teaching theology at Biola University, I made the decision that my sermons would be under 30 minutes. * Actually, it’s harder to prepare a 30-minute sermon than most 45-minute sermons. Points must be crisper, introduction and conclusion more focused, illustrations and applications more “to the point.” Harder to do, but worth it.

So the time is shortened but the goal is still there: to present God’s Word clearly and practically. And my prayer always is that a tighter 30-minute sermon will be better and more effective than a 45-minute one.

Which leads me to two questions to discuss with my Catholic friends.

First, why are homilies so short and how can they become better? Second, why would many worshippers want to use Latin liturgy they cannot understand in worship (Eucharistic) services?

The homily (another word for the sermon, usually reflecting brevity) should be a Spirit-filled time in worship when people can hear the Word of the Lord proclaimed, explained and applied. It’s true that God’s Word can come non-verbally (St. Augustine said the Bread and Cup of the Eucharist are verba visibilia, “visible words”, and stained glass windows in traditional sanctuaries tell the story of Jesus without audible words). But the verbal proclamation is biblically demanded and necessary for growing faith and spiritual transformation through the inner ministry of the Holy Spirit.

During the height of Covid restrictions (July, 2020), the Archdiocese of Santa Fe demanded that homilies within its jurisdiction be very brief—five minutes and even down to three minutes! Priests offering longer homilies could have their “faculty to preach” suspended. Why, most evangelical preachers haven’t finished their sermon introduction in three minutes!

The Apostle Paul instructed his protégé Timothy, “Devote yourself to the public reading of Scripture, to preaching [exhortation, encouragement] and to teaching” (1 Timothy 4:13). These three dynamic encounters with the Word of God should prominently characterize our worship services still today.

George Weigel is my favorite Catholic writer. In his book Evangelical Catholicism (Basic Books, 2013) he summons Catholic priests to “The Imperative of Preaching Well.” He challenges them to deliver homilies

that proclaim the Bible as the Word of God, that invite the people of the Church to meet the Lord through his holy Word, and that empower Catholic men and women to take the Gospel into the world and draw people to Christ.

The evangelical Catholic priests of the future must relearn the importance of expository preaching, which requires careful study of the liturgy’s biblical texts through the use of good biblical commentaries, many of which will have been written by Protestant scholars. (p. 145)

Now as to liturgy, should it be in the language of the worshippers or is Latin permissible if not preferred? ** My wife and I attended a Latin Mass a few years ago. It indeed was ascetically beautiful with a sense of transcendence. But the spoken word (beyond the brief homily) could not build faith or transform life because it was not understood (Romans 10:17). (I do note that worshippers may follow the liturgy in their own language through the use of a “missal”—roughly similar to a printed Protestant order of liturgy, including readings. A missal wasn’t available to us during our visit.)

Paul told the Corinthian believers whose worship services were full of speaking in unknown tongues, “Unless you speak intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone know what you are saying?” (1 Corinthians 14:9). Instead, “strive to excel in building up the church” through meaningful words (14:12). Intelligible words are a must for worship in its fullness.

Whether in a Charismatic gathering where many are speaking in tongues without interpretation, or in a Eucharistic service where the liturgy is not understood, or listening to a highbrow sermon with big theological terms and Greek thrown in, the edification of the mind and spirit is truncated. In short, a key purpose of the worship service is unaccomplished.

If your church board wants to set measureable performance goals *** for your pastor (whoever has the primary teaching task), make this one Top Priority:

Give 44 sermons a year that are well-researched, well-organized, true to the text of Scripture, with excellent homiletics, heart-felt strong delivery, understood by all, timely and practical. ****

* This was partly necessitated by a tight Sunday morning schedule with multiple services, three after 1997.
** I read almost every day about the controversies over liturgy in the Catholic Church. The issues go much deeper than simply a debate over language. Saints Peter & Paul Catholic Church in Wilmington, CA offers a Latin Tridentine Mass at 9:30 a.m. Pacific time on Sundays. It can be viewed via YouTube at: www.sppc.us
*** And I’m not saying they should. Much of a pastor’s task is not quantifiable.
**** “Understood by all” – even a deep sermon needs some cookies on the bottom shelf. The number of weekly sermons can flex. “44” is based on 4 weeks of vacation and 4 weeks for other speakers or programs. Congregations expecting sermon excellence need to supply their pastors with time and ample funds for ongoing training, books and other resources, and must protect the pastor’s sermon preparation time.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]“We must remove police from traffic stops.” So says the leader of an activist group in California.

Likewise, University of Arkansas law professor Jordan Blair Woods proposes “a new legal framework for traffic enforcement that separates it from critical police function” (“Traffic Without the Police,” Stanford Law Review, June 2021).

More later on the wisdom, or lack thereof, of removing police from traffic enforcement. Here is a personal story…

My teenage granddaughter, shortly after getting her driver’s license, did a “California [slow] stop” for a right turn on red late one evening. She got a ticket, not because an officer observed her but because a camera did.

The fine was $100—fair enough. But by the time all kinds of governmental fees were slathered on, she was out almost $500. This is unjust and seems to me to be a clear violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of “excessive fines.” Does anyone know if this issue has ever been litigated?

This magnitude of fines can get people of limited means onto a “downhill snowball” debt slope they cannot escape if they are unable to pay and penalties start piling up. Politicians who claim to have special concern for the poor should take a hard look at these unreasonable fees.

Unlike cameras (which some foolishly propose as a partial substitute for having sworn officers make traffic stops), the officer has both a head and a heart. One key feature of a traffic stop is when the officer weighs the factors and decides either to issue a ticket or just give a warning. At such a moment, the officer balances doing justice and loving mercy (Micah 6:8), and strives for “the spirit of the law” above “the letter of the law.”

I was a teenager when an officer in a small Indiana town pulled up beside me as I waited at a traffic signal and said, “Watch yourself! This town’s not a race track!” But I’m at a dead stop! What happened? I was “profiled” because I was DWMT – “Driving While Male Teen”. Fortunately, I could outgrow that—the teen part, that is.

That scene stays with me almost 60 years later, along with all the times I was actually stopped by law enforcement. Only once was I ticketed—driving through open farm country on an empty highway in Ohio. The officer who motioned me to pull over told me an airplane monitored me going 60 mph in a 50 mph section of that highway. The ticket (paid by credit card on the spot) was $80, not $500, but I still thought the stop was unfair.

All the other times I was stopped I was warned, even sternly lectured, and sent on my way.

The idea that officers are pressed and eager to achieve ticket quotas or that cities want more citations to up their income is largely a myth or very rare or in the past or in the movies. Have minorities been unfairly targeted? In certain times and places, yes. This must change! (I stress unfairly, because a statistical disproportion in itself does not show improper policing.)

I can’t prove it, but I’d wager my granddaughter would have gotten away with a stern warning had she been pulled over by the police after her “California
stop” that night.

And she would have learned more in a positive way from that experience than she could ever learn from the resentment-building excessive fine.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]

Religious Liberty Vigilance –
Cancelling Free Speech

[NOTE: What “America First” represents doesn’t matter to me when it comes to the First Amendment. I would say the same things here if leftists were prevented from holding a rally in Anaheim, CA featuring Bernie Sanders.]

Politics and social engineering have invaded formats traditionally neutral on such matters (like SPORTS!), and this is both sad and alarming. In fact, it’s time to speak against it.

An “America First” rally that had been scheduled for Saturday night, July 17, at the Anaheim Event Center has been canceled, the city of Anaheim announced. Republican Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Matt Gaetz of Florida had been expected to speak at the event.

A spokesman for Anaheim, said, “As a city we respect free speech but also have a duty to call out speech that does not reflect our city and its values.”

No, city officials DO NOT have such a duty. Their duty is to run an effective local government that serves the needs of the people and spends wisely.

George Will says, “Perhaps…Anaheim’s city government [has] time and resources to spare because they have excellently completed the jobs they actually are supposed to perform. Perhaps.” (Washington Post, July 21, 2021)

And WHO DECIDES what the City of Anaheim’s values are? Who presumes to speak for the rest of the community, which is certainly diverse?
First Amendment limits on government do not apply to private groups but do call into question government pressure to control speech in these groups.

The First Amendment is designed to prevent government from establishing an intellectual orthodoxy. Governments throughout history have attempted to do this, creating official established religions that could not be criticized or banning the profession of certain ideas. James Madison, author of the First Amendment, stood athwart the tide of history and yelled stop. The new democratic republic would, from its onset, be the first government in history to dedicate itself to individual intellectual freedom.

There is no exception to that rule for speech that the government believes is untrue. In the United States, people can say the most ridiculous things in full confidence that the government will not try to silence them. – Henry Olson, Washington Post, July 21, 2021 [bold mine]

But the government IS trying to silence and cancel! The pressing question is, are we willing to rise to the occasion and work to preserve our freedom of speech, our free exercise of religion, and the right to assemble?

Shameful Political Correctness and
Cancel Culture in Charlottesville

Charlottesville, Virginia did more recently than (understandably) remove two Confederate statues.

Under left-wing pressure, the City Council held an emergency meeting with 20 minutes’ notice and voted to remove a monument honoring explorers Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, along with their indispensible guide and translator, an Indian woman named Sacagawea (depicted as a trail guide, not as a subservient woman). Lewis, born in the county, was a local hero.

The Lewis and Clark expedition (1804-06) was a project launched by one of Virginia’s great sons, Thomas Jefferson. Travelling from St. Joseph, Missouri to the mouth of the Columbia River, it explored the extent of the Louisiana Purchase and performed many other services such as Lewis documenting plant and animal life.

“Follow the Science”?

Abortion was the topic one evening on “Nightline” with Ted Koppel. After listening to a guest argue for a position supposedly based on “science”, he interjected, “With all due respect, what you are arguing for has nothing to do with science.” No science—all ideological advocacy. Good for Koppel!

Today the mantra is, “Follow the science.” But does this directive often either limit or exceed “the science” and advocate ideology instead?

Tom Nicholson, a researcher at Duke University, shows how objective science has suffered during the Covid pandemic:

The quality of scientific publications suffered during the Covid-19 pandemic. From dubious prepublication studies to bombshell papers quietly retracted months later, it has been a busy but difficult time for major medical and epidemiology journals. Peer-review and clinical-trial processes have sped up, and few would claim this generally improves the quality of the research or its conclusions.

The same has happened in the less rigorous world of policy analysis. Working groups and research collaboratives have issued recommendations to government, business, universities and other institutions without even a cursory peer review. Often these groups offer more encouragement and opinion than rigorous findings.
– Wall Street Journal, July 9, 2021[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

July-August 2021 Newsletter

Posted on June 30, 2021 by admin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”949″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_custom_heading text=”“A Piece of My Mind”” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:50px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”July-August 2021 Newsletter” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:30px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

Coping with Life’s Uncertainties

Now listen, you who say, “Today or tomorrow we will go to this or that city, spend a year there, carry on business and make money.” Why, you do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes.

Instead, you ought to say, “If it is the Lord’s will, we will live and do this or that.”

– James 4:13-15 (NIV)

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

Message of the Month – Coping with Life’s Uncertainties

Legendary Dodger broadcaster Vin Scully once said, “If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.”

Every time I open my i-Pad I’m greeted by a picture from our wonderful 50th anniversary Alaskan cruise in June 2016. Mary and I never planned on “55” being that glamorous, but we did talk ideas. Concern about travel and Covid put the planning on hold. And those plans wouldn’t have come to fruition anyway because right before our anniversary I was in the hospital.

It started with a wake-up pain in the middle of the night that I recognized—I might be passing a kidney stone. The stone was confirmed in the emergency room and later that morning I went home. This was repeated the next week.

Finally an urologist told me to go to the hospital for admission. I didn’t know I also had bleeding ulcers that were exhausting my strength. I was sitting on the side of an emergency room bed when next thing I knew the room was full of medical personnel bringing me back to reality.

After lots of effective treatment and good care and good food (I didn’t eat the first two days), I came home. Our anniversary was enjoyed at home with dinner delivered from a local restaurant. Future treatments are being lined up for July and after.

The episode has given me pause to think about life and its uncertainties.

First, as I told the hospital chaplain, I give thanks to God all the more for the excellent health I’ve enjoyed throughout my entire 76 years.

Second, thanks to God and heart-felt appreciation to my wife, Mary, and my family—for her incredible care and assistance and their support at every turn.

Third, I was reminded (as the above scripture teaches) that planning has its place but God holds the veto. He has his purposes and I probably won’t have insight into them beyond the ultimate assurance that “all things work together for good to them who love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose” (Romans 8:28 – the King James Version gives a better “read” on the meaning of this verse than some modern translations do).

My plans for the future must factor in God’s purposes (“if the Lord wills”) and my own human frailty (“you are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes”). I am honoring God, showing faith, and facing reality honestly when I preface the big plans with “If the Lord wills…” It goes without saying, God’s moral will for my life must also be factored into the plans I make.

Fourth, I’ve come to a deeper appreciation for those who work in health care, especially at the level of hospitalization. Theirs has not been an easy 18 months. Their work runs the gamut from what requires highly skilled training to things most mundane if not most unpleasant. They do it over and over, and do it well.

Fifth, I need to listen to this marvelous body the Lord has given me. There were signs that things were not OK. It’s easy to brush these aside with a “this too shall pass” attitude. No, we need to listen to our bodies.

Sixth, be reminded that each day may be our final chance to make amends, set things right, express love we’ve suppressed, make that call or send that message and more. And are our earthly affairs set in order? The Psalmist prayed, “Teach us to number our days” (Psalm 90:12), that is, treat each day as significant.

Seventh, I believe more than ever in God’s willingness to minister blessing to us in response to prayer. To the point, “Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective” (James 5:16 NIV). Thanks to all who prayed for me.

Since being home I’ve enjoyed waking up and while still in bed singing hymns like, “Praise God from whom all blessings flow” or “Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty! Early in the morning my song shall rise to Thee” or “When morning guilds the skies, my heart awakening cries, ‘May Jesus Christ be praised!’”

In the morning, Lord, you hear my voice;
In the morning I lay my requests before you and wait expectantly.
– Psalm 5:3

[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Religious Liberty Vigilance –
The Liberty Bell and the Power of Scripture

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…

– The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776

“Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?

– Thomas Jefferson, “Notes on the State of Virginia”

The “Liberty Bell” was commissioned in 1752 by the Pennsylvania Assembly. It was cast by the London firm of Lester and Pack and was lettered: “Proclaim LIBERTY Throughout all the Land unto all the Inhabitants Thereof.”

The quote is from Leviticus 25:10. In its context, it is truly a call for liberty throughout Israel—spiritual liberty, yes, but with teeth in it that affected the land (giving it time to rejuvenate) and how people must treat people and release those enslaved to bondage. (Read Leviticus 25.)

In the 1830’s the bell with its message took on a deeper significance as a symbol of abolitionism. If we “proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof,” we must not exclude those who are enslaved.

We recently celebrated the meaning of “Juneteenth,” commemorating when General Gordon Granger and his troops arrived in Galveston, Texas in 1865 to proclaim the end of the last vestige of American slavery—Texas yet had 250,000 slaves. (But we can’t ignore today’s underground slavery in the U.S.)

Whenever we think of the Liberty Bell and the implications of its biblical quotation, from now on we will remember what happened in Galveston. In our hearts perhaps we hear the bell ringing and remember the scripture.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

On the American Revolution and Slavery

(in the face of some revisionist theories today)

Far from retarding the abolition of slavery, the Revolution actually accelerated it. Its triumph gave a big boost to Enlightenment liberalism, which inspired the First Emancipation in the US (the abolition of slavery in the North that became the first large-scale emancipation of slaves in modern history), and boosted antislavery movements in Europe, as well…

For all their failings, the Revolution and Founding paved the way for abolition. That happened in large part because they were the first large-scale effort to establish a polity based on universal liberal principles rather than ties of race, ethnicity, or culture.

Those principles are at the root of most of America’s achievements, of which the abolition of slavery was perhaps the most important. They are also what enabled America, at its best, to offer freedom and opportunity to people from a wide range of racial and ethnic backgrounds from all over the world.

– Ilya Somin, “Juneteenth and the Universalist Principles of the American Revolution”, The Volokh Conspiracy, June 19, 2021

Doctrinal Thoughts from a Milestone Document

Exactly 100 years ago The Brethren Church (forerunner of my denomination today) adopted a document known as:

“The Message of the Brethren Ministry”

It was not a creed per se and wasn’t binding on Brethren churches. But it did set forth the viewpoint of Brethren ministers on nine points of doctrine. It was adopted by the denomination’s ministerial association in 1921. Here are the nine key points [my comments in brackets]:

We understand the basic content of our doctrinal preaching and teaching to be:

1. The pre-existence, deity and incarnation by virgin birth of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
2. The fall of all people [humanity’s fall “in Adam” in Genesis 3], their consequent spiritual death and utter sinfulness, and the necessity of their new birth;
3. The vicarious atonement of the Lord Jesus Christ through the shedding of His own blood. [“Vicarious” is not commonly used today. “Substitutionary” – Jesus died in my stead, bearing my sin, obtaining my forgiveness – is common now.]
4. The resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ in the body in which He suffered and died and His subsequent glorification at the right hand of God.
5. Justification by personal faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, of which obedience to the will of God and works of righteousness are evidence and result; the resurrection of the dead, the judgment of the world and the life everlasting of the just;
6. The personality and deity of the Holy Spirit who indwells the Christian and is a personal comforter and guide;
7. The personal and visible return of our Lord Jesus Christ from heaven as King of Kings and Lord of Lords; the glorious goal for which we are taught to wait, watch and pray;
8. The Christian should “be not conformed to this world but be transformed by the renewing of the mind”; should not engage in car¬nal strife, and should “swear not at all” [the last two phrases now obscure how they were then understood: Christians should not “bear arms” in military conflict and must not swear oaths in court or elsewhere to support the veracity of their words.];
9. The Christian should observe, as a duty and privilege, the ordinances of our Lord Jesus Christ, among which are (a) baptism of believers by triune immersion; (b) confirmation; (c) the Lord’s supper; (d) the communion of bread and wine; (e) the washing of the saint’s feet; and (f) the anointing of the sick with oil. [These points might be called “denominational distinctives”; they are worthy of discussion but a word on each would far exceed the scope of these pages.]

The nine statements have served us well. They are concise, rather clear, continually relevant, and mostly address critical issues of the faith rather than minor or denominational issues. Contrary to our earlier aversion to church creeds, they were actually adopted by the “Grace Brethren” in 1938 as a statement of faith until they were replaced by a new statement in 1969.

Here is a call I issued in the year 2000 pertaining to point #7 on the Second Coming of Christ, a call I strongly reaffirm today (published in Sharpening One Another, a publication of the Association of Grace Brethren Ministers):

Grace Brethren Eschatology:
Where Should Our Fellowship Go?

By Dr. Donald P. Shoemaker, Senior Pastor
Grace Community Church (FGBC) of Seal Beach, California

In 1921, Dr. Alva J. McClain authored “The Message of the Brethren Ministry,” setting forth the common beliefs of the Brethren ministers of that day. The statement has been a defining document of our movement ever since and was endorsed by the General Conference in 1938.

This is the eschatology statement of “The Message”:

The personal and visible return of our Lord Jesus Christ from Heaven as King of Kings and Lord of Lords, the glorious goal for which we are taught to watch, wait and pray.

Since the summary of our beliefs is always a current statement of a never-ending process (this side of Glory) to articulate truth, rather than a statement of our perfect understanding of truth, I believe the time has come for us to revisit our current position on eschatology. Specifically, I propose it is time for us to extend latitude toward more than one evangelical option on how the Rapture of the Church relates to the Tribulation Period.

Here are some reasons for my thinking…

(1) Belief in a pre-tribulation rapture is neither an essential part of historic Christian confessions nor (either in breadth or duration) of the belief patterns of the Brethren throughout our history.

(2) The notion of a 7-year tribulation rises from only one interpretation, among many viable ones, of Daniel 9:25-27, an apocalyptic passage notoriously cryptic.

(3) The pre-tribulation rapture is generally defended along inferential lines rather than from relatively straightforward statements of the biblical text.

(4) Creating our identity around a fine point of eschatology and separating from other Christians over such a fine point seem contrary to “maintaining the unity of the Spirit” in the Body of Christ.

(5) The study of eschatology is by nature a tentative exercise, especially the more we refine our position beyond the fundamental points of a Second Advent, resurrection, judgment and eternal state.

(6) Twentieth-century “Dispensationalism” has undergone modifications in recent years that have called into debate some of its features previously thought to be “necessary.”

(7) A confidential survey of Grace Brethren ministers in 1982 found that a sizeable minority of ministers confessed varying degrees of reservation over our stated position on a pre-tribulation rapture. The number of ministers with reservations has most likely increased since 1982. A spirit of honest inquiry on matters not foundational to our faith as Christians is best done in an unthreatening and brotherly context where we can be “free to disagree.”

(8) Our witness to our world and our expression of our self-identity should focus on the major themes that separate “light from darkness” (or at least they should express major theological themes) rather than peripheral or tangential areas where godly, conscientious Christians have differences.

So I would pose the question, “Is now the time for us to identify ourselves more with the historical Christian hope and with the Evangelical mainstream in our eschatology?” A return to Dr. McClain’s articulate words could be a good step in that direction.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

What Are the Most Empty Words We Use?

I mean, yeah, there are lots of empty and thoughtless words. These words may, you know, be meaningless, habitual, worn out, or demeaning. OK?

But what word or words are truly the worst? Could it be that comment when people just can’t prove their point so they say, “It is what it is”? Or what the server at the restaurant says each time an item is brought to the table, even a straw—“There you go”?

Perhaps it’s the dismissive word “whatever.” It flippantly treats the point being discussed as trivial and discardable, as if of no consequence. It diminishes the other person in the communication.

Right?

But maybe you, like, disagree with me and want to “throw me under the bus.” Look, Uncle Joe has something to say to you: “C’mon, man!”

Our Little 2021 Contribution to Creation

Monarch butterflies are having it tough these days. We thought we’d become pro-active in adding to their number. (My wife has done most of the work!)

We’ve amply supplied the yard with essential milkweed plants, once driving many miles to get some. There the eggs are laid and the larvae eat so voraciously. We’ve provided safe places for the larva and chrysalis stages. When the butterflies emerge from their cocoons we give them a couple of days of protection for gaining strength and then we release them.

This season we’ve released 37 butterflies into nature and lost only a very few which didn’t fully develop or were diseased.

A Good Word from Elsewhere…

Hate Speech and the Death of Philosophy

By Donald DeMarco, professor emeritus of Saint Jerome’s University and an adjunct professor at Holy Apostles College and Seminary. From Crisis Magazine, June 7, 2021.

One of the most important distinctions we can make during these troubled times is between philosophy and ideology. PHILOSOPHY is the search for truth employing the universal human faculty of reason. Therefore, philosophy is for everyone.

An IDEOLOGY, on the other hand, is limited to a set of ideas that does not have a universal scope. Consequently, an ideology is not for everyone, but rather for the relatively few who agree with its tenets. Aristotle, Plato, Aquinas, Maritain, and Gilson are philosophers. Nothing is excluded from their range of thought. Marxism, Freudianism, Darwinism, and Feminism are ideologies. Marx builds his ideology on economics, Freud on psychology, Darwin on biology, Feminism on the female sex. Each of these ideologies is lacking in breadth.

An ideology has a certain claim to respectability because it purports to improve society and culture. Nonetheless, because of its limited purview, it is inherently incompatible, even antagonistic, to philosophy… An ideology barricades itself against dialogue with a philosophical viewpoint. In fact, it is often hostile toward philosophy. It is a defense system, not an outreach.

How important is philosophy to society? We should heed the words of Étienne Gilson, who warned that “If we lose philosophy itself; we must be prepared to lose science, reason, and liberty; in short, we are bound to lose Western culture itself together with its feeling for the eminent dignity of man.”
We need philosophy to learn about the breadth of reality, not a mere fragment; to understand the nature of the human being and not settle for an ideological construct; to provide a basis for all people to live together in harmony, not merely a select few. The task of the philosophy teacher is to make virtue attractive to his students and evil repulsive—and to show his future legislators that philosophy, more than any ideology, contains the best promise for a better world.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

Don has been a member of the clergy in the Long Beach CA area since 1970. He serves currently as Pastor Emeritus of Grace Community Church of Seal Beach (where he was senior pastor 1984-2012) and as Senior Chaplain of the Seal Beach Police Department (2001+). He previously was an assistant professor of Biblical Studies at Biola University and chaired the Social Concerns Committee in the Fellowship of Grace Brethren Churches from 1985 to 2019. His graduate work includes a master’s degree in theology from Fuller Theological Seminary with a concentration in Christian ethics, and a doctor of ministry degree from American Baptist Seminary of the West with a concentration on the modern Charismatic Movement. He and his wife Mary have been married for 55 years. They have two children and six grandchildren.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

June 2021 Newsletter

Posted on May 31, 2021 by admin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”949″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_custom_heading text=”“A Piece of My Mind”” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:50px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”June 2021 Newsletter” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:30px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

The Healing Power of Touch

Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. “I am willing,” he said. “Be clean!” And immediately the leprosy left him. – Luke 5:13

Touch is more than one of the five senses. When welcomed, it is a vital part of human interaction. Unwelcomed, it is an intrusion or worse.

During the present pandemic many have died in clinical situations without human touch. But a LA-USC physician recently confronted this clinical coldness and said holding the hand of a Covid patient is “one medicine that supersedes all science and all education and anything we could do.”

Science is important and necessary, but it isn’t a be-all and know-all.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”What is “Black Lives Matter”?” font_container=”tag:h2|text_align:center” google_fonts=”font_family:Arimo%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700%2C700italic|font_style:400%20regular%3A400%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”By Donald P. Shoemaker” font_container=”tag:h6|text_align:center” google_fonts=”font_family:Arimo%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700%2C700italic|font_style:400%20regular%3A400%3Anormal”][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1630″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1631″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1632″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1633″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]Sadie Payne, 32, was gunned down as she waited at a bus stop in Columbus, Ohio in the early morning of April 8. She was the 54th homicide in Columbus so far in 2021.

Sadie’s Life Mattered.

Davell Gardner, 22 months old, was shot and killed in Brooklyn in the summer of 2020.

Davell’s Life Mattered.

Horace Lorenzo Anderson, 19, died June 20, 2020 after being shot inside Seattle’s “summer of love” Autonomous Zone. City government had no plans in place for providing emergency services to this “surrendered” area.

Horace’s Life Mattered.

Le’Shonte Jones, 24, was gunned down and her 3-year-old daughter wounded May 3 in Miami-Dade County FL as she came home from her TSA shift.

Le’Shonte’s Life Mattered. Her Daughter’s Life Matters.

8600 blacks died from gunfire in the U.S. in 2020.

All These Lives Mattered.

The Blacks who were killed or injured in the Tulsa-Greenwood Race Massacre of 1921— All Their Lives Mattered.

The Tulsa Race Massacre occurred exactly 100 years ago this weekend—May 31-June 1, 1921. Many Americans have never heard about it—I didn’t, and American History was part of my college major.

“Black Wall Street” – Greenwood was a prominent and prosperous center for black businesses in the early 20th Century.

Following a jailhouse incident that left 10 Whites and 2 Blacks dead, a rampaging mob went through Greenwood shooting and burning and looting. I’ve seen a wide range of death statistics—perhaps between 75 and 300 blacks were killed but the information varies. Many more were wounded and 10,000 left homeless. Thirty-five blocks of the community were destroyed. Pictures remind me of the aftermath of an EF5 tornado. The Oklahoma National Guard ended the carnage on June 1.

107-year-old Viola Fletcher, the oldest living survivor of the massacre testified at a recent congressional hearing on “The Centennial of the Tulsa-Greenwood Race Massacre.”

“I will never forget the violence of the white mob when we left our house… I still see Black men being shot, Black bodies lying in the street. I still smell smoke and see fire. I still see Black businesses being burned… I hear the screams. I have lived through the massacre every day.”

If this event is not now in our history books, it certainly needs to be there.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”1635″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”1636″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]Introduction: In response to some inquiries and to satisfy my own need for information and desire for accuracy, I looked extensively in 2020 and again in recent weeks into “What Is ‘Black Lives Matter’?” My present conclusion is that it is best to see the phrase “Black Lives Matter” (BLM) as having three primary usages. My goal here is to illuminate rather than critique.

1. “Black Lives Matter” [BLM] is first of all an organization with a sweeping agenda.

From the BLM Website: www.blacklivesmatter.com

“About”

#BlackLivesMatter was founded in 2013 in response to the acquittal of Trayvon Martin’s murderer. Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, Inc. is a global organization in the US, UK, and Canada, whose mission is to eradicate white supremacy and build local power to intervene in violence inflicted on Black communities by the state and vigilantes. By combating and countering acts of violence, creating space for Black imagination and innovation, and centering Black joy, we are winning immediate improvements in our lives. [BOLD mine]

We are expansive. We are a collective of liberators who believe in an inclusive and spacious movement. We also believe that in order to win and bring as many people with us along the way, we must move beyond the narrow nationalism all too prevalent in Black communities. We must ensure we are building a movement that brings all of us to the front.

We affirm the lives of Black queer and trans folks, disabled folks, undocumented folks, folks with records, women, and all Black lives along the gender spectrum. Our network centers those who have been marginalized within Black liberation movements.

We are working for a world where Black lives are no longer systematically targeted for demise.

We affirm our humanity, our contributions to this society, and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression.

The call for Black lives to matter is a rallying cry for ALL Black lives striving for liberation.

“What We Believe” [NOTE: I obtained this page from the BLM Website in 2020. It has now been deleted. Deletion of these points doesn’t necessarily mean repeal.]

• Every day, we recommit to healing ourselves and each other, and to co-creating alongside comrades, allies, and family a culture where each person feels seen, heard, and supported.
• We acknowledge, respect, and celebrate differences and commonalities.
• We work vigorously for freedom and justice for Black people and, by extension, all people.
• We intentionally build and nurture a beloved community that is bonded together through a beautiful struggle that is restorative, not depleting.
• We are unapologetically Black in our positioning. In affirming that Black Lives Matter, we need not qualify our position. To love and desire freedom and justice for ourselves is a prerequisite for wanting the same for others.
• We see ourselves as part of the global Black family, and we are aware of the different ways we are impacted or privileged as Black people who exist in different parts of the world.
• We are guided by the fact that all Black lives matter, regardless of actual or perceived sexual identity, gender identity, gender expression, economic status, ability, disability, religious beliefs or disbeliefs, immigration status, or location.
• We make space for transgender brothers and sisters to participate and lead.
• We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle cisgender privilege and uplift Black trans folk, especially Black trans women who continue to be disproportionately impacted by trans-antagonistic violence.
• We build a space that affirms Black women and is free from sexism, misogyny, and environments in which men are centered.
• We practice empathy. We engage comrades with the intent to learn about and connect with their contexts.
• We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.
• We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.
• We foster a queer‐affirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise).
• We cultivate an inter-generational and communal network free from ageism. We believe that all people, regardless of age, show up with the capacity to lead and learn.
• We embody and practice justice, liberation, and peace in our engagements with one another.

To these points can be added this important statement: Law enforcement cannot be reformed. Law enforcement as we know it, therefore, must be dismantled and replaced. Attempts at reform will not work.

The BLM organization has leaders who may be speaking for themselves and not for the organization (in which case, they and the organization should make that clear).” Some leaders have expressed Marxist claims, anti-capitalist statements, and possible calls to violence. Patrisse Cullor, a BLM co-founder, has been criticized for purchasing homes in Los Angeles county. As I’ve reviewed details, it’s hard for me to see that any home under $600,000 could be considered a luxury. Even the home in tony Malibu that sets up Topanga Canyon Road would be modest and rustic by most standards. We leave these matters to #BLM to judge unless illegal activity can be shown.

2. Secondly, the “BLM” title is used to express concern about violence against blacks by law enforcement.

One opinion writer insists this is ALL the phrase means, nothing more. Unjust violence, including killings, under color of authority is a serious issue and deserves separate and distinct consideration. Not only is such violence unjust in itself, it also marks law enforcement in a way contrary to its essence and how it wants to be perceived.

Statistics are tricky, but here is some information I found: Statista Research Department reports 241 deaths of blacks at the hand of law enforcement in 2020, and 62 in the first four months of 2021 out of a total of 292 civilians shot and killed by law enforcement. These statistics are slightly more than half of the number of whites killed, which is statistically significant but in itself says little more than that. The rate of blacks killed by law enforcement is higher than that of any other ethnic group. These stats don’t go into the reasons (justifications) for the use of lethal force.

As important as it is to examine the death of blacks at the hands of law enforcement, this reality must be compared to the much larger issue of how many black deaths are due to homicide. In 2020, 8600 black lives were lost to homicide. In 2018 there were 7407 black homicide victims (6237 male) in the United States.

The 2016 homicide rate among black victims in the United States was 20.44 per 100,000. For that year, the overall national homicide rate was 5.1 per 100,000. The homicide rate for black male victims was 37.12 per 100,000. In comparison, the overall rate for male homicide victims was 8.29 per 100,000.

(Sources: Statista, September 30, 2019 and May 3, 2021; Colorlines, May 30, 2019;
New York Post, February 6, 2021)

3. Third and finally, the phrase “Black Lives Matter” has just about become generic for those expressing any concern about wrongful treatment of blacks.

Summary and Concluding Thoughts:

The phrase “Black Lives Matter” can refer to:
(1) A leftist organization by that name, or
(2) Widespread movements expressing concern over perceived mistreatment and violence by law enforcement against blacks, or
(3) Generically, a variety of activist concerns pertaining to black lives.

When is it timely to drop a phrase in favor of a new one because the old phrase has something associated with it you don’t support, or because the phrase has become so generic as to dilute meaning? I don’t know. I do know this is sometimes necessary in Christian ministry circles, when terms change meaning or gain unwanted associations.

Why don’t we adopt the phrase “All Black Lives Matter”? This would encompass inappropriate use of force by law enforcement and much more. While anecdotal cases focus on actions by law enforcement, statistics support this broader concern. The ratio of black deaths by law enforcement compared to all black deaths due to homicide stands around 1:34. This is horribly significant!

For daily information on this and related issues, I recommend: www.Feedspot.com[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Message of the Month –
“ ‘The Image of God’ We Are!”

As a child I often sang with other children in Lutheran Sunday School:

Jesus loves the little children,
All the children of the world.
Red and yellow, black and white,
they are precious in his sight.
Jesus loves the little children of the world.

Truly, “From the lips of children [God has] established strength” (Psalm 8:2).

In 1976 I was a brand new member of the Biblical Studies faculty at Biola University. I was soon asked to give a short presentation to the faculty on the Bible’s teaching about humanity. I carefully prepared a 10-minute talk.

Another professor would present what “science” says. He got up first and said, “According to science, man is an animal.” And he sat down.

I should have, but didn’t, stood and said, “According to theology, man is made in the image of God.” And sat down, at least for the moment. For in those few words you learn the most important truth there is to know about who we are.

So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.
– Genesis 1:26 (New English Version)

Theories abound on what this “image” is. Original righteousness? Reason? Love and communication? Spirituality and morality? Self-understanding and sense of the past and future? Relationship with one another (as God is an “us” [verse 25] he made man as male and female to interrelate accordingly).

All interesting; none definitive. Best to simply say human beings are the offspring of God (Acts 17:29) and bear a special resemblance to him. Humans thus have special duties and immeasurable worth and must be so regarded.

The “image of God” prevents us from stratifying humanity according to some arbitrary criterion of worthiness. Not just kings and philosophers, not just males but also females, not just the free but also the enslaved, not just the enfranchised but also those outside looking in—all bear God’s image.

The Holocaust of World War II was made possible because Third Reich leadership, unchecked by an acquiescent church, changed the understanding of what gives man his worth. Steeped in Reformation heritage, the state should have understood that each person possesses a dignity given from above—a dignity unrelated to achievement or potential or desirability. Instead, the Third Reich weighed humans in terms of their usefulness to the state, their place on the hierarchy of human worth (Aryans at the top; Jews at the bottom), their being an asset rather than a liability to the state machine.

“Image of God” teaching declares a resounding “Nein!” to all this! The disabled and dependent, the unborn and newborn, the aged and terminally ill, the genius and moron, the insider and the outsider—all, regardless of race or social status or human condition, are valued by God.

This doctrine leads to important practical matters:

(1) Human life is precious and must never be wrongly taken. “You shall not kill [murder]” – Exodus 20:13, see Genesis 9:6.
(2) Human dignity can be assaulted by how we treat people. Jesus saw the commandment against murder as applicable to our words and actions that fall short of actual killing. He taught us to avoid unjust anger and malicious labeling. He called us to extend forgiveness and avoid adversarial conflict – Matthew 5:21-26, see Romans 12:14-21.
(3) How our speech assaults the image is a special theme in the Epistle of James (3:3-12) – “With the tongue we praise our Lord and Father, and with it we curse men, who have been made in God’s likeness … My brothers, this should not be” (verses 9-10).

Sometimes it’s really hard to acknowledge God’s Image in others. But those times are when this doctrine’s “rubber meets the road.” Jesus calls us to be like his Father in heaven, who “causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good and sends his rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.” We too must extend love and shalom not just to those whom we like and who benefit us but to the unlikeable who bring nothing good in return (Matthew 5:43-48).[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]

Back The Badge

“Blessed are those who
maintain justice.”
– Psalm 106:3

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”1637″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

The “Broken Window Theory” Helps Answer “What’s Going Wrong Today?”

By Donald Shoemaker

During my first year in college the men’s dorm was a refurbished (sort of) wing of a spooky “turn of the century” (that’s 1900, not 2000) inn used in the old Bible Conference heyday of Winona Lake, Indiana. It had a high tower in the middle with lots of windows near the top (for ventilation in those days).

One winter day we were throwing snowballs at the tower. Sure enough, one snowball managed to break one of the high windows. Initial guilt didn’t last long. Soon we were having “hit a window” snowball contests. I thought of this experience when I first heard of the “Broken Window Theory.”

The “Broken Window Theory”, first brought to the public’s attention by political scientist James Q. Wilson and others in 1982, argued that when small deteriorations are permitted in a community, soon greater deterioration will occur. Overlooking small vices will encourage risk-takers to go to larger vices.

“Broken Windows” was the metaphor for the smaller deterioration—vandalism, public drinking, “fare-hopping,” disorderly conduct, petty thefts, criminal trespass, graffiti, letting trash accumulate, poor maintenance of property, and more.

A “don’t care” attitude toward minor violations leads to bigger crimes and more deterioration. “One unrepaired broken window is a signal that no one cares, and so breaking more windows costs nothing. Disorder increases levels of fear among citizens, which leads them to withdraw from the community and decrease participation in informal social control” – Psychology Today, n.d.

Eventually the “good guys” give up, shut up, close up and move on if they can.

Better policing is a key response to “broken windows” – not aggressive policing but assertive policing which is problem-focused, pro-active (better community relations, foot patrols, defusing adversarial situations, holding people accountable for minor offenses) plus a broader community response.

What’s happening today? In California, legitimate concern over high prison populations has led to unwise changes such as turning some felony charges into misdemeanors. Passing a bad check under $950 or shoplifting goods under $950 in value is now a misdemeanor, not a felony. A misdemeanor charge may lead to no prosecution at all. Don’t think thieves can’t calculate!

In Los Angeles County, the new district attorney, George Gascón has become a very controversial figure due to his “reforms” that many fear will lead to an increase in crime. One is a decision not to prosecute first-time offenders accused of an array of non-violent crimes *. Nothing wrong with having diversionary programs that keep youth out of the prison system. But accountability must be there and responsibility must be learned. A law without consequences is nothing more than good advice.

“It is naïve and dangerous for the press and responsible political leaders…to think that closing their eyes to lawlessness won’t break down broader respect for the rule of law itself.” – Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal, January 28, 2021

* Crimes not to be prosecuted include trespassing, disturbing the peace, a minor in possession of alcohol, driving without a license, driving with a suspended license, making criminal threats, drug and paraphernalia possession, being under the influence of a controlled substance, public intoxication, loitering to commit prostitution and resisting arrest.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Religious Liberty Vigilance –“Day of Prayer” – without God

“Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?
– Thomas Jefferson, “Notes on the State of Virginia”

By law, the President of the United States must issue a proclamation each year designating the first Thursday of May the “National Day of Prayer.”

Every president has done so since 1953. But this year’s proclamation was different. For the first time ever, “God” was not mentioned. I have a hard time getting into a big tizzy over this, but I do have concerns.

First, a generic prayer that is essentially “To Whom It May Concern” is not a Christian prayer. So if that is how we are supposed to pray (and some governmental agencies have said so) I can’t get much more upset over a prayer exercise that goes a little farther by not mentioning deity at all.

Second, I won’t deny the therapeutic value of prayer as an exercise even absent mention of a deity. But this understanding of prayer is sub-Christian. Prayer is personal—to “Our Father in Heaven” who invites us to communicate with him.

Third, I recognize a meaningful place for references to deity throughout our nation’s history—references generally conforming to Judeo-Christian monotheism. This doesn’t make us a “Christian Nation” nor should we seek that identity. Jefferson was a monotheist but not a Christian believer (apparently).

The Long Beach City Council had opening prayers for decades and I offered prayer there several times. Then at some point city leaders specified that the prayer had to be non-sectarian (I think that policy is unconstitutional but that’s a different matter). No religion should allow prayer to be used as window-dressing—a nod to deity after which we do our own thing. Now this prayer is replaced by a benign, brief, bowed moment of silence—I call it a “navel exercise.”

Personally, during such moments I pray silently to “Our Father in Heaven” for blessing to our city and wisdom to its leaders.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

The president’s proclamation lauds prayer itself, not the One to whom it is offered. [See appendix for full text of the Proclamation]

Throughout our history, Americans of many religions and belief systems have turned to prayer for strength, hope, and guidance. Prayer has nourished countless souls and powered moral movements — including essential fights against racial injustice, child labor, and infringement on the rights of disabled Americans. Prayer is also a daily practice for many, whether it is to ask for help or strength, or to give thanks over blessings bestowed.

Prayer is essentially deified, idol-ized. We turn to prayer for “strength, hope, and guidance,” not to God who gives wisdom to those who ask him in prayer (James 1:5). Prayer, rather than God, “has nourished countless souls and powered moral movements.” It would have been so easy to say, “Prayer is also a daily practice…to ask GOD for help or strength…” But no. Prayer, not God, is “a healing balm.” There is no healing “Balm in Gilead [the love of Jesus] to make the wounded whole.”

The First Amendment to our Constitution protects the rights of free speech and religious liberty, including the right of all Americans to pray. These freedoms have helped us to create and sustain a Nation of remarkable religious vitality and diversity across the generations.

Yes, and the First Amendment protects our right to pray in public to “The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob” and to order our lives by the teachings we get from God. This has sustained “religious vitality and diversity” but it won’t continue if the “woke” win the day and cancel religious expressions that don’t fit the conformity they require.

So on this National Day of Prayer, I give thanks for our precious freedoms, including the religious liberty we must vigilantly protect. I give thanks to God for the gift of life and every abundance, and for his moral guidance. I pray for shared virtues and values to uphold our nation, but only if we uphold them.
– May 6, 2021

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

Don has been a member of the clergy in the Long Beach CA area since 1970. He serves currently as Pastor Emeritus of Grace Community Church of Seal Beach (where he was senior pastor 1984-2012) and as Senior Chaplain of the Seal Beach Police Department (2000+). He previously was a professor of Biblical Studies at Biola University and chaired the Social Concerns Committee in the Fellowship of Grace Brethren Churches from 1985 to 2019. His graduate work includes a master’s degree in theology from Fuller Theological Seminary with a concentration in Christian ethics. He and his wife Mary have been married for 55 years. They have two children and six grandchildren.

Appendix: 2021 Presidential Day of Prayer Proclamation

Today, we remember and celebrate the role that the healing balm of prayer can play in our lives and in the life of our Nation. As we continue to confront the crises and challenges of our time — from a deadly pandemic, to the loss of lives and livelihoods in its wake, to a reckoning on racial justice, to the existential threat of climate change — Americans of faith can call upon the power of prayer to provide hope and uplift us for the work ahead. As the late Congressman John Lewis once said, “Nothing can stop the power of a committed and determined people to make a difference in our society. Why? Because human beings are the most dynamic link to the divine on this planet.”

On this National Day of Prayer, we unite with purpose and resolve, and recommit ourselves to the core freedoms that helped define and guide our Nation from its earliest days. We celebrate our incredible good fortune that, as Americans, we can exercise our convictions freely — no matter our faith or beliefs. Let us find in our prayers, however they are delivered, the determination to overcome adversity, rise above our differences, and come together as one Nation to meet this moment in history.

The Congress, by Public Law 100-307, as amended, has called on the President to issue each year a proclamation designating the first Thursday in May as a “National Day of Prayer.”

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 6, 2021, as a National Day of Prayer. I invite the citizens of our Nation to give thanks, in accordance with their own faiths and consciences, for our many freedoms and blessings, and I join all people of faith in prayers for spiritual guidance, mercy, and protection.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-fifth.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

May 2021 Newsletter

Posted on April 30, 2021 by admin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”949″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_custom_heading text=”“A Piece of My Mind”” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:50px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”May 2021 Newsletter” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:30px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

Mother’s Day – May 9, 2021

May your father and mother rejoice;
may she who gave you birth be joyful!

A wife of noble character who can find?
She is worth far more than rubies.

Her children arise and call her blessed;
her husband also, and he praises her.

Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting;
but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1612″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]

– Proverbs 23:24; 31:10, 28, 30

Back
The Badge

“Blessed are those who
maintain justice.” – Psalm 106:3

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1613″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Peace Officers Memorial Day – May 15, 2021

For those who walk it,
the Thin Blue Line is a reflection of courage,
a pledge of brotherhood, and a tribute to the fallen,
affirming that their memory lives on.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1614″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]

Brian Sicknick (EOW January 7)
William Evans (EOW April 2)
United States Capitol Police

Line of Duty Deaths so far in 2021: 109

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1615″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Divest the Police?

I recently received an e-mailing from an activist organization. It said, “In the first 3-½ months of 2021, 260 people have been MURDERED by police in this country” including the “MURDER” of 20-year-old Daunte Wright in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota.

“We must remove police from traffic stops. We must minimize the role that police play in our daily life. This means divesting from police institutions and re imaging what our criminal legal system looks like.” [BOLD CAPS mine]

My response (edited):

I have been a member of the clergy in the Long Beach area for 51 years. I also am a police chaplain (20 years). I am horrified at the death of Daunte Wright. At this point, it appears there was a total failure on the part of Officer Kim Potter, a veteran officer experienced enough to be training others to follow proper training and precautions in the use of a Taser and to keep her firearm secured. It was a horrible and inexcusable mistake with tragic, permanent results.

At the same time, there was an active warrant for Mr. Wright’s arrest, for carrying a gun without a permit and for fleeing officers. Expired license plates give an officer reasonable suspicion to pull over a vehicle and investigate further. In this case, the suspicion was justified. Furthermore, Mr. Wright resisted arrest and attempted to flee. Had he cooperated with lawful orders, the officer’s horrible error would not have happened and Mr. Wright would still be here for his family.

You call this a murder. It was not. My observation is that this officer’s conduct was far removed from the conduct of officer Derek Chauvin in the death of George Floyd, Chauvin being found guilty of second-degree murder (and more). The charge in the case of Mr. Wright’s death is second-degree manslaughter, defined in Minnesota as causing the death of another “by the person’s culpable negligence whereby the person creates an unreasonable risk and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm to another” (609.205).

You also speak of 260 murders by police so far in 2021. Can you prove this allegation? I don’t think so. My own review of police-related deaths in January-March 2021 found instances of gun battles and of police stopping violent assaults by shooting assailants—situations not at all warranting a charge of “murder.” Because you are an attorney, your assessments must be held to a higher standard of accuracy in legal matters than those by the general public. Your comments are inflammatory.

You say, “We must remove the police from traffic stops.” Who, then, will do the stops? Unarmed civilians? Or will you do away with traffic stops? Will you proliferate cameras that the public hates? Traffic stops are important for public safety. Many stops yield more serious findings than the simple infraction for which the vehicle is stopped (which itself may be serious). I have been at many such scenes. Every traffic stop must be approached as a circumstance with elevated risk. The officer’s safety is compromised by traffic moving by, by tinted windows in many cars, by being

New Mexico State Patrolman Darian Jarrett, killed by gunfire at a traffic stop on February 4

at a positional disadvantage, and simply by not knowing who is in the car that may have malicious intent.

Together we must work to make this a safer society. It will require the efforts of all to obey the laws, to find alternatives to incarceration when appropriate, to hold self and others accountable including those in law enforcement, and recognize the need for assertive law enforcement that is fair and just but also when necessary is “God’s agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer” (Romans 13:4).[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]Respectfully,
Donald P. Shoemaker

Still OK in the U.S. to Belittle Southerners

“Aw, they’re just a bunch of rednecks!” If “rednecks” referred to Native Americans and you said this at work or maybe even on your social media, you might find yourself out of a job.

But “rednecks” doesn’t refer to Native Americans. The term applies mostly to rural White southerners. And it’s usually derogatory (like “Bubba” *). But you can get away with it. Why? Because the last spheres of crude badmouthing have yet to be conquered. It’s still OK in America to speak derisively about southerners AND traditional Roman Catholics AND Protestant Fundamentalists and get away with it.

If you don’t know how southerners act or talk or think, these scoffers might point you to reruns of “The Dukes of Hazzard” or “The Beverly Hillbillies.”
Or tell you stories about Jimmy Carter’s brother Billy.

A very interesting column by writer Tracy Moore, who lives in Los Angeles, appeared in The Washington Post on March 17. Coming from a rural Tennessee town in Appalachia, she spoke with a southern drawl. You do a load of “warsh.” You buy “IN-sur-ance,” not “in-SUR-ance.” How old are you?
“Ahm nihhhnteen.”

Some of this dialect found its way to the Ohio countryside where I grew up.
I was a clueless store clerk when a customer asked if I had a “poke.” That’s a bag. A creek is a “crick.” Smoke goes out a “chimley.” Your pet is a “dawg.” When you’re bad, you get a “whoopin’.” “A-fixin’ to go down home” means getting ready to visit family in Kentucky. But who really talks funny—“usuns” or them? When I was in Tennessee 15+ years ago I struck up a conversation with a couple. Then I said, “I’m not from around here,” to which they replied, “Yeah, we can tell!”

Tracy Moore worked long and hard to reshape her speech. “I don’t believe for a second I’d have made it as a journalist any other way.” She observes (surely with hyperbole), “Millions of other people have dropped their Southern accent to avoid the perception of dimwittedness. Appalachian English is particularly stigmatized.”

“Recently, I nearly said, ‘That dog won’t hunt’ to shoot down a bad idea in a professional conversation, and it took everything in me to reprogram my brain to find a more acceptable phrase.” (I wonder what expression she used!)

“My efforts to de-twang paid off. Aside from a few missteps — never ask people if they ‘got their picture made’ — I could sound reasonably intelligent in Los Angeles.”

So what’s causing her now to revert to her speech roots? The coronavirus. Working away from others, she noticed herself returning to her early-life speech patterns. She explains, “To find the culprit, I asked Morgan Sonderegger, associate professor of linguistics at McGill University, and he told me that I can safely blame the coronavirus. Isolation thwarted the frequent chitchat with people of more culturally acceptable accents that made it easier for me to push the drawl down.”

This most interesting account points to my point on which groups are still stigmatized even in our “correct” America. Fundamentalists, for example, are prima facie closed-minded, bigoted, unsophisticated Bible-thumpers.

Finally, “that dog won’t hunt” is one mighty fine way of sayin’ “yer idea will flop” even if y’ain’t from her “neck of the woods.”

* In its advertising, an LA-area plumbing company depicts “Bubba” plumbers as unreliable buffoons who talk with a southern drawl. Take out “Bubba” and replace it with some other social identity and see what happens to you!

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Bible Insight – A Future 7-Year Tribulation?

Daniel 9:24-27 – Few Scriptures are more cryptic, more subject to several reasonable interpretations, or viewed with more prophetical dogmatism than this one!

24 “Seventy ‘sevens’ are decreed for your people and your holy city to finish transgression, to put an end to sin, to atone for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the Most Holy Place.
25 “Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens.’ It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble.
26 After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing. The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed.
27 He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’ In the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And at the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him.”
– Daniel 9:24-27 New International Version

Without being encouraged to wrestle with other interpretations, I was taught that this scripture was a key that unlocks the “last days.” Verse 27, I learned, speaks of the Antichrist [“He”] who makes a 7-year “covenant” with the Jewish people [“many”] but breaks it half way through and imposes an “abomination” on the rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem. This interpretation yields the notion of a terrible “7-year Tribulation” just before Jesus returns.

Today I’m much more cautious about interpretations. The Bible is “inspired by God”; its interpretations are not. What are the interpretive options?

My former colleague at Biola University, Dr. Ron Pierce, does an excellent job of laying out the options in his commentary on Daniel (Baker Books, 2015, pp. 164-65). Before laying out the options, he gives two important cautions:

(1) “…the New Testament nowhere appeals to this passage to confirm the time of Jesus’ coming…” (p. 162)
(2) “…the consensus in biblical scholarship regarding the difficulty of this text should evoke a sincere posture of humility in the way we write and speak.” (p. 163)

Messianic Interpretations [The NIV Bible capitalizes “Anointed One”]
• Traditional: The final “week’ of the “70 weeks” (of years) was fulfilled during the earthly ministry of Jesus and the destruction of Jerusalem.
• Typological: The final “week” is the tribulation under “antichrist” at the end times just before Jesus returns.
• Dispensational [the view I was taught]: As with “typological,” the last “week” is disconnected from the first 69 weeks of years and placed in the “eschatological future.” Israel will face the tribulation; the church will be raptured prior to it.
Antiochene Interpretation
• The first “69 weeks” include the “times of trouble” for Judea under Persia and Greece (6th to 2nd century BC). “The last ‘seven’ represents Judea’s persecution under Antiochus IV (171-164 BC), the ‘ruler who is to come.’ This last ‘seven’ finds its midpoint in Antiochus’s desecration of the temple (167 BC) and ends with its rededication (164 BC).”

Dr. Pierce sums up the options in these words:

In sum, the widely divergent messianic views agree on their Christological understanding of this passage but are deeply divided regarding the combination of events that connect the sixty-nine “sevens” to Jesus the Messiah. In contrast, the Antiochene view is a nonchristological—although much more unified—reading of these verses, primarily in their literary and historical contexts.

The lack of consensus among Christian interpreters through the centuries should give us pause before we make ONE interpretation THE interpretation. Unless we believe that our perspective “in the last days” gives us box seats to watch biblical prophecies unfold before us (an attitude almost cultic), we need to heed the author’s call for humility in our interpretations and not make our own view a test of orthodoxy—what can and can’t be taught in our churches.

Two newsletter pages can’t discuss this debate thoroughly. But I’ve given enough to remind us not to be dogmatic when examining sections of scripture that are very cryptic (at least to the non-contemporary reader). This is the ONLY scripture in the whole Bible that supports, according to ONE interpretation, the notion of a SEVEN-YEAR TRIBULATION in the last days.

For me, that’s not enough for holding that notion dogmatically.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Religious Liberty Vigilance – Lifting Restrictions!

Bill of Rights 21 “I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from inter meddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises.”
– Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Miller, 1808

The Corona Pandemic has produced challenges to religious liberty:
(1) Limitations on the “free exercise of religion” (in the forms of gathering together, singing, partaking of Communion for examples).>
(2) Limitations or prohibitions against pastoral services, such as for the hospitalized or for funerals.>

Most people of faith, including Christians I know, want to be supportive of the state as it performs its legitimate “police power” of protecting public health.
It is one way to “love your neighbor as yourself,” as Jesus taught us.

But many laypeople and ministers have been concerned over excessive, burdensome or unequal limitations on religious expression. Consider NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio’s condemnation of a Jewish funeral procession and celebration of “racial justice” protestors (my July 2020 Newsletter). (I support the right of BOTH worshippers and protestors to gather peacefully.)

But there is more than light at the end of the tunnel! The sun is shining!

1. A string of U.S. Supreme Court summary decisions have scaled back government restrictions against worship gatherings.

On April 15, the State of California issued this statement: “In response to recent judicial rulings, effective immediately, location and capacity limits on places of worship are not mandatory but are strongly recommended.”

This is a major improvement over discriminatory rules that placed religious gatherings under greater restrictions than the restrictions on similar secular gatherings.

2. There is growing recognition that the failure at many levels of government to recognize the “essential” role of religion during the coronavirus crisis was unwise and detrimental, if not illegal.

Government is unqualified to say religion is non-essential. To the contrary, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that religion preforms many beneficial services within society (Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York, 1970).

Robert Garcia, Mayor of Long Beach California, said in an email to me, “Donald, I absolutely agree that faith base organizations and community organizations are a vital part of our community.”

The “Religion Is Essential Act” (SB 397) is now before California’s State Senate. It provides as follows (8663.1), (a) and (b) are the key points:

(a) (1) During a state of emergency, the Governor shall deem religious services to be an essential service and to be necessary and vital to the health and welfare of the public.
(2) During a local emergency, the governing body of the city or county or the official designated pursuant to Section 8630 shall deem religious services to be an essential service and to be necessary and vital to the health and welfare of the public.

(b) During a state of emergency or a local emergency, the state and local governments shall not take a discriminatory action against a religious organization and shall permit a religious organization to continue operating and engaging in religious services to the same or greater extent that other organizations or businesses that provide essential services that are necessary and vital to the health and welfare of the public are permitted to operate.

(c) The state and local governments shall not enforce any health, safety, or occupancy requirement that imposes a substantial burden on a religious service unless the state or local government demonstrates that applying the burden to the religious service is essential to further a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.

(d) Except as provided by subdivision (c), this section does not prohibit the state or local governments from requiring religious organizations to comply with health, safety, or occupancy requirements issued by the state or federal government that are applicable to all organizations and businesses that provide essential services.

The “Religion Is Essential Act” is good legislation and deserves support by the citizens of California.

What Is “The Golden Rule” for Social Media?
“Tweet others as you would have others tweet you!”

Many Bible proverbs stress the importance of wholesome words. This advice is most important today because of the special dangers in (un)social media. Take these proverbs to heart. Weigh your words carefully before you “send”!

He who spreads slander is a fool. – Proverbs 10:18
When words are many, transgression is not lacking. – Proverbs 10:19

A gossip betrays a confidence, but a trustworthy person keeps a secret. – Proverbs 11:13
A gentle answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger. – Proverbs 15:1

The soothing tongue is a tree of life, but a perverse tongue crushes the spirit. – Proverbs 15:4

The Lord detests the thoughts of the wicked, but gracious words are pure in his sight.
– Proverbs 15:26

Pleasant words are a honeycomb, sweet to the soul and healing to the bones.
– Proverbs 16:24

A gossip separates close friends. – Proverbs 16:28
A gossip betrays a confidence; so avoid anyone who talks too much. – Proverbs 20:19[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

PEARLS BEFORE SWINE © 2021 Stephan Pastis. Reprinted by permission of
ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION. All rights reserved.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Good Words from Others…

Radical Cultural Marxism in our Educational Systems

“I think our universities and K-12 educational systems have become indoctrination centers for radical cultural Marxists. They are national security threats for what they have done. They [regard] reason and logic—the very means we have used to adjudicate between truth claims—as the creation of white supremacist imperialist white men. So when you take the very means that we used to arbitrate among disputants as the constructs of racists, what you have done is criminalize thought and you have disarmed individuals from thinking. You have taken feelings as the means of arbitrating among disputes. So you can get fired if you dispute the feelings of someone because feelings are the way I assert and reinforce my identity.”

—Jason D. Hill, Professor of Philosophy at DePaul University. Dr. Hill emigrated from Jamaica in 1985 and became an American citizen. He is the author of What Do White Americans Owe Black People (Racial Justice in the age of post-oppression) and Civil Disobedience and the Politics of Identity.

Counterfeit Christs

“In the many counterfeits of Christ through the centuries the dead giveaway of a false Savior is a smooth skin unburdened by the wounds of [the Cross].
“Counterfeit Christianity always delights in showing the heart of Christ, but not His pierced heart. From that seemingly harmless symbolism tumbles the inverted creed of Counterfeit Christianity. It centers not on sacrificial love but on sentimental luv…”

— From “Resisting a Counterfeit Easter” by Fr. John A. Perricone

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

Don has been a member of the clergy in the Long Beach CA area since 1970. He serves currently as Pastor Emeritus of Grace Community Church of Seal Beach (where he was senior pastor 1984-2012) and as Senior Chaplain of the Seal Beach Police Department (2000+). He previously was a professor of Biblical Studies at Biola University and chaired the Social Concerns Committee in the Fellowship of Grace Brethren Churches from 1985 to 2019. His graduate work includes a master’s degree in theology from Fuller Theological Seminary with a concentration in Christian ethics. He and his wife Mary have been married for 55 years. They have two children and six grandchildren.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

April 2021 Newsletter

Posted on March 31, 2021 by admin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”949″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_custom_heading text=”“A Piece of My Mind”” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:50px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”April 2021 Newsletter” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:30px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

Butterfly Nursery Our Easter Hope – Resurrection to New Life

We’ve started a “Monarch Butterfly Nursery” at home! My wife diligently cares for the butterflies as they go through their stages. Their larva stage is a time to eat and nothing else. Then they are enclosed for several days at the chrysalis stage. From that, they burst forth in beauty and are soon ready to fly.

It’s a beautiful picture of resurrection. Our earthly bodies, like Jesus’ body, were made for our present existence. When Jesus returns, we will break forth from the grave with beautiful resurrection bodies, as Jesus did—he “died for our sins…was buried…and was raised the third day” in glory.

“When the perishable has been clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality, then the saying that is written will come true: ‘Death has been swallowed up in victory’.” – 1 Corinthians 15:3-4, 42-44, 50-54

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

April, 1961 – The “Bay of Pigs” Invasion

Sixty years ago this month, on April 17, 1961, 1500 Cuban exiles opposed to Fidel Castro’s rule (which began in 1959) landed at the Bay of Pigs on the SW coast of Cuba with the hope of defeating defenders and generating support from islanders for Castro’s overthrow. The planning began during the Eisenhower administration and continued when John Kennedy took office in January 1961. Finally, the invasion was approved by the new president.

Victory was not to be. Within three days the invaders were defeated and most were captured. Kennedy had cancelled plans for air cover, dooming the operation.

The invasion was a total failure and a deep embarrassment to the new president and his administration. It solidified Castro’s grip on the nation and led Cuba to look to the Soviet Union for future support.

Over 100 insurgents were executed. In December 1962 most that remained were released in exchange for $53 million in food and medicine, the money raised from companies and private donations. About 1000 family members also left Cuba with them.

Kennedy Kennedy took full responsibility for the failure. Especially poignant, two days after the collapse of the invasion Kennedy invited Dwight Eisenhower to Camp David to get, as Kennedy later told the press, “the benefit of his thoughts and experience.”

It was quite an encounter: a new president who just lost a skirmish involving 1500 invaders talking with a former president who once planned and executed the greatest invasion in the history of the world—D-Day, June 6, 1944.

Recommended reading: Three Days in January by Bret Baier (HarperCollins, 2017)

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Bible Insight – “The Perseverance of the Saints”

To my non-Christian Readers: This “Insight” might seem like an in-house religious thing, but please give it a read. Christians can be cantankerous. But we can and should instead be thoughtful and do a better job explaining who we are and living by what we believe. No Christian is without sin, but sin is nonetheless incompatible with faith in God and needs to be remedied through reconciliation with God and others. Forgive us our failings!

To my Christian Readers: This topic is divisive. But we would all do ourselves a favor by understanding it better and not misstating the other side. In heaven we’ll understand better. Most important, we will have persevered!

The doctrine of “Perseverance of the Saints” (those truly converted to Jesus will never completely fall away but will be saved in the end) could also be called “The perseverance of GOD for the saints” (Philippians 1:6 – “He who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Jesus Christ.”).

Jesus gave support for this doctrine in his word about the sheep he chooses and cares for. In John 10:25-30 Jesus taught on divine “Keeping Power”:
v. 28 – “They [his sheep] shall never [ou mé—double negative, a powerful negation] perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand.”
v. 29 – “My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all;
no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand.”
v. 30 – “I and the Father are one.” (In purpose? In essence? Both? If in purpose, Jesus and his Father are working purposely together to preserve his sheep.)

A critic of the doctrine may respond, “Yeah, but you can snatch yourself out of Jesus’ hand!” But if so, this means we must be greater than Jesus and his Father, whom Jesus just said “is greater than all” (including you and me).

Wayne Grudem (Bible Doctrine, p. 337) questions this self-snatching: “But that seems to be quibbling over words—does not ‘no one’ also include the person who is in Christ’s hand? Moreover, we know that our own hearts are far from trustworthy. Therefore, if the possibility remained that we could remove ourselves from Christ’s hand, the passage would hardly give the assurance that Jesus intends by it.”

After all, the biggest threat to one’s perseverance is not what someone else, even the Devil, might try to do. The biggest threat comes from our own selves.

There is one other important truth in this shepherd/sheep motif:
v. 27 – “My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me.”
(Genuine sheep obey their shepherd—a key point in perseverance.)

What is the difference between “perseverance” and “eternal security”?

“Eternal security” is a popular way of saying we cannot forfeit our salvation. But I don’t like the phrase and I think it should be abandoned. Here’s the problem:

“Eternal security” is encompassed in the word “Perseverance.”
But “Perseverance” is NOT encompassed in the phrase “eternal security”.

Others characterize this teaching as “Once saved, always saved” or “Once in grace, always in grace” (a critic said: ”If you get out of grace, you’re a disgrace!”).

Eternal security can become a sort of spiritual fire insurance or a “get out of jail pass” doctrine, separating our responsibility from God’s promise. “Perseverance” in contrast stresses our responsibility and describes the faithfulness of a true believer.

Many Christians believe it is possible for someone who was once genuinely converted to Jesus to so fall from the faith as to forfeit salvation and be lost in unbelief once again. A popular term for this falling away is “backsliding”.
“What’s happened to Joe? I haven’t seen him at church for months!” “Joe? Oh, Joe backslid—he’s living in sin again.” (See “spiritual failures” below.)

How can Hebrews 6:4-9 be understood relative to “perseverance”?

4 It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age 6 and who have fallen away, to be brought back to repentance. To their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.

Option #1 – It speaks of a false convert who renounces the faith. At best, he only had a “near conversion” experience and exposure to the work of the Holy Spirit. For this person to fall away from the four spiritual privileges mention in Hebrews 6:4-5 is to put oneself beyond the possibility of true repentance.

My problem with this option is this: if found in any other biblical context, the four spiritual privileges would certainly be seen, especially when all together, as indicators of a full and genuine conversion experience.

Option #2 – It describes a true believer who falls away. If this proves we can lose our salvation, it proves too much. Those who believe one can lose salvation certainly also believe that one who is saved and then lost can be saved again.

Some may argue that this person has committed “The Unpardonable Sin”, but I don’t think so. Jesus explained “The Unpardonable Sin” differently (Matthew 12:22-32).

Option #3 – This is a hypothetical case followed by a reassurance (my preferred option). What if a truly converted person did indeed fall away? Then repentance and return would never be a possibility. But “even though we speak like this, we are confident of better things in your case—things that accompany salvation” (6:9). Hence, the scenario is hypothetical. See 1 Corinthians 15:14-20 for a similar hypothetical scenario followed by a reassurance.

What about those sticky “conditional” scriptures?
Don’t they disprove “perseverance”?

“He who stands firm to the end will be saved.” (Matthew 24:13)
“By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you.” (I Corinthians 15:2)
“…if you continue in your faith, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel.” (Colossians 1:23)

No, they don’t disprove “perseverance.” Actually, they reinforce it. But they do disprove “eternal security” as it’s often depicted. “Perseverance” means steadfastness—to the end. Conditional statements must be taken seriously. Compare the seed that falls on the pathway versus the seed that falls on good ground (next point).

The Parable of the Sower, the Seed, and the Soils (Matthew 13:1-23)

Three of the “soils” that represent those to whom the message of God’s kingdom has come are described in Matthew 13:20-23 –

20 The seed falling on rocky ground refers to someone who hears the word and at once receives it with joy. 21 But since they have no root, they last only a short time. When trouble or persecution comes because of the word, they quickly fall away. 22 The seed falling among the thorns refers to someone who hears the word, but the worries of this life and the deceitfulness of wealth choke the word, making it unfruitful. 23 But the seed falling on good soil refers to someone who hears the word and understands it. This is the one who produces a crop, yielding a hundred, sixty or thirty times what was sown.”

Only the good soil that is fruitful describes Jesus’ true follower.

Genuine believers may have significant spiritual failures.

Any realistic Christian knows how quickly and easily (or over time) spiritual failure can come. What counts is how we respond to failure. Not by denying it or accepting it, but by confessing it and forsaking it (1 John 1:5-10).

Few have failed worse than the foremost apostle, Simon Peter (Luke 22:31-34):
(1) Jesus’ warning – “Simon, Simon, Satan has asked to sift you as wheat.”
(2) Jesus’ assurance – “But I have prayed for you, Simon, that your faith may not fail.” (Does Jesus’ Father in heaven hear the prayers of his Son?)
(3) Promised recovery – “When you have turned back, strengthen your brothers.”
(4) But Simon is self-confident still – “I am ready to go with you to prison and to death.”
(5) Simon’s utter failure – he disowned Jesus three times (Luke 22:54-60).
(6) His deep remorse and true repentance – Simon Peter wept bitterly (Luke 22:61-62).

Rather than using proud, self-confident, self-righteous people to upbuild others, Jesus uses disciples who are flawed and have learned from their failures. After their spiritual recovery, they can strengthen others toward perseverance.

How can we be assured of our salvation?

Wayne Grudem gives three excellent points on what gives assurance (Bible Doctrine, pp. 343-46):
• Present trust in Christ for salvation (I’ll call this the Truth test)
• Evidence of regenerating work of the Holy Spirit in my heart (Godliness test)
• Long-term pattern of growth in my Christian life (Growth test)

I’ll add a fourth source of assurance from 1 John 3:16-20 – Love for my brothers and sisters in Christ, expressed in word and deed (Love test).

Our sense of security must not come primarily from our memory of some decision we may have made in the distant past, but our present patterns of spiritual growth.
Ultimately, our assurance of salvation rests on the accomplished work of Jesus for us. So in faith we sing the great hymn “Jesus, Thy Blood and Righteousness.”

Bold shall I stand in that great day,
cleansed and redeemed, no debt to pay;
For by thy cross absolved I am
from sin and guilt, from fear and shame.”

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”1600″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]

Back
The Badge

“Blessed are those who
maintain justice.” – Psalm 106:3

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Jerry Schultz Why the Spike in Crime?

By Jerry Shultz

Jerry Schultz is active in the Neighborhood Watch protection program in neighborhoods of east Long Beach. He is Viet Nam vet (U.S. Army), a retired deputy of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, and a former member of the California State Guard. He also served on the Long Beach City Council.

I am frequently asked why we are seeing an increase in property crime…
Well, let’s take a look.

I will use the term “perfect storm” to describe what is happening in California as regards to crime trends. First of all, the state of California has changed the state’s criminal sentencing laws (Propositions 47 and 57), which redefined the legal threshold as pertains to misdemeanor and felony crimes. Many felonies are now misdemeanors and many misdemeanors are equivalent to an infraction. Consequently, there is little disincentive to steal and being jailed is a rarity.

Let me share an example. One of my sons is a Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff (as I was for 31 years). He told me yesterday that he worked a PM (evening) patrol shift on Friday night and that during his shift he and his partners made four “rolling stolen” arrests. This is cop vernacular for running the license plate on a vehicle being driven on the road and it comes back as being stolen. He makes the traffic stop and arrests the perpetrator.

My son related that his arrestee was on parole for an assault with a deadly weapon during a drive by shooting and had previously been released on a carjacking charge. He had to book and release him at the station. No jail time. Another arrestee was wanted by the LAPD for a string of armed robberies. The two others had been previously arrested and cited in December for vehicle theft and were released on zero bail. So, they stole vehicles again, were caught and were also in possession of meth, narcotics paraphernalia and had other outstanding warrants. Because of the new L.A. County District Attorney’s directive, these criminals have no fear of being caught because they know they will see little, if any, jail time and they were in fact smiling as they were being booked.

The second part of the “perfect storm” is the push to defund or underfund the police. The LAPD budget was slashed by $150 million and their crime is up significantly. The L.A. County Sheriff’s budget was cut by $145 million, which translates to the loss of 1,281 deputy positions and the closure of the Sheriff academy. Deputies retire but are not being replaced. Special crime units are being disbanded. The LBPD lost 54 positions and we have already seen a marked increase in murders, shootings and property crimes. When a police department loses sworn positions, they have to readjust resources, i.e. officers will be moved from lower crime areas to higher crime areas in the city.

The third element of this trifecta is the release of prisoners to reduce the state’s prison population (Assembly Bill 109). California prisons already released 3,500 inmates and Los Angeles County has released more than 5,000 since the Covid-19 pandemic began. Critics argue that these changes have released inmates back into the streets before they should have been, leaving them free to commit crimes they should still be serving time for, and in some cases keeps them from serving any meaningful time at all.

As you can see, the ”perfect storm” of downgrading crimes, defunding the police and the release of thousands of offenders onto our streets can only have one outcome: higher crime. It has already begun.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Religious Liberty Vigilance –
“The Equality Act” (H.R.5) should be called
“The Religious Freedom Cancellation Act”

Bill of Rights 21 “I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises.”
– Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Miller, 1808

Whether or not you support the issues raised in the LGBTQ-friendly “H.R. 5” (now before the U.S Senate), anyone who cherishes religious liberty should be concerned and at least work for a compromise that protects all sides.

“The Equality Act” literally zoomed through the House of Representatives without any substantive debate. It was introduced on February 18 and passed on February 25, without committee hearings and with merely 90 minutes of perfunctory debate on the floor of the House. Hardly an honorable journey for a bill of such consequences and controversy.

Here are reasons for concern over H.R. 5:

(1) Most importantly, H.R. 5 would severely and arbitrarily limit the legal options of an organization or individual that has a religion-based objection to the new rights that H.R. 5 bestows.

Section 1107 of H.R. 5: “The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 shall not provide a claim concerning, or a defense to a claim under, a covered title, or provide a basis for challenging the application or enforcement of a covered title.” [Emphases mine]

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (signed into law by President Clinton in 1993 after passing Congress near-unanimously) protects the rights of religious organizations and individuals to practice their own beliefs and prevents them from being forced to violate those beliefs.

Only in a case of “compelling state interest” may government override the religious practices of the people, and then only by using the least restrictive means. (H.R. 5 asserts that it meets this two-fold criteria: “this Act furthers the government’s compelling interest in the least restrictive way because only by forbidding discrimination is it possible to avert or redress the harms described in this subsection” [Section 2a—Findings and Purpose]. That’s not true, of course, because providing exemptions that protect religious freedom would be a less “restrictive way” than what this bill does.)

The “Equality Act,” by cancelling religious exemptions, will force significant violations of religious conscience as people of faith strive to practice their faith through their vocations and community ministries.

(2) H.R. 5 appears to turn churches, as places of public gatherings, into “public accommodations”, thereby subjecting churches to numerous anti-discrimination rules (Section 3) and forcing them either to violate core religious convictions or violate new governmental requirements.

(3) Homeless shelters and domestic violence shelters will not be able to exclude those who identify themselves differently from their biological sex. For example, a shelter for abused or otherwise traumatized (by men) women would be forced to allow biological men into women’s sleeping areas (as has happened in Anchorage, Alaska). Locker rooms and dressing areas must be available to any whose gender identity fits “MEN’S” or “WOMEN’S” rooms.

(4) Religious institutions such as Christian schools (all the way from pre-school through graduate school) will not be able to practice their religious convictions or have hiring policies consistent with these convictions.

(5) Women’s sports and competitions could not exclude any biological male who identifies as female. For example, a biological male could compete with women in track competitions in spite of the physiological advantages that a biological male would bring to the competition.

(6) By broadening the meaning of “sex,” abortion and contraceptive services are incorporated into the bill’s “protections.” This, once again, inhibits the rights of religious institutions to uphold their moral convictions in their employment policies.

I plan to express my opinion on H.R. 5 to my two senators,
and I hope those who read my concerns will do the same.

Shameful Xenophobia Close to Home

This note was received by a resident of Seal Beach’s Leisure World who had recently lost her father. It was postmarked the day of his burial. Leisure World is a mile-square community for over 9000 seniors.

Leisure World The community has come together in reaffirming this resident’s right to live in
peace and acceptance. More than expressing an opinion, the letter contains a threat—“Get out or else!” It definitely does not express the sentiments of the vast number of good people in Seal Beach, including those who live in the retirement community itself.

“When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them.
The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born.
Love them as yourself.” – Leviticus 19:33-34 NIV

Some Final Words… “The Economic World of Faith & Promise”

“Faith” is often seen as some kind of “religious thing” divorced from science and reason. But stop and think how often we choose to exercise faith in everyday life. The important question is, how strong and secure is the object of our faith?

“When the Boom Turns to Bust” is a sobering op-ed by Andy Kessler in The Wall Street Journal (March 8) that looked at the times of stock market bust since 1987.

For those lulled by today’s bull market, remember that you own a piece of paper… Stocks are backed by expectations of future earnings, but if you overpay during periods of high expectations (like today), then your downside is huge. Crypto is backed simply by the faith of those who proclaim it is a store of value. Even art and exotic cars and silly NFT [non-fungible tokens] are backed only by faith the wealthy will overpay for uniqueness. Faith becomes scarce when the selling starts.

In the same spirit of prudence, Robert Hargraves looks at how companies buy renewable energy credits (he fittingly calls them “indulgences”) so they can boast of their “net zero emissions” while they continue to pollute (The Wall Street Journal, March 8).

“Net zero is a new word for indulgences to emit CO2. When will a modern Martin Luther nail truth to the door of the cathedral of green religion?”

Californians were promised that their futuristic “Bullet Train” would be built at a reasonable cost in a reasonable amount of time, operate without costing taxpayers anything, and whisk lots of people between LA and San Francisco in about two hours—thus competing with flying. It will be none of these. Doc Brown’s “Back to the Future” flying train will be here before this train full of faith promises arrives.

State money gained from “cap and trade” pollution fees put toward this visionary train now stands at $3 billion since 2015 and expects to be $500 million per year through 2030—money that could be used on more worthy and for-real projects. One congressman wants $32 billion from the feds to finish the job, saying the train is a “justice” thing. Oh please! As we seek justice and what’s best for people, how about some projects that practice justice by keeping faith with the public?[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

Don has been a member of the clergy in the Long Beach CA area since 1970. He serves currently as Pastor Emeritus of Grace Community Church of Seal Beach (where he was senior pastor 1984-2012) and, since 2000, as Senior Chaplain of the Seal Beach Police Department. He previously was a professor of Biblical Studies at Biola University and chaired the Social Concerns Committee in the Fellowship of Grace Brethren Churches from 1985 to 2019. His graduate work includes a master’s degree in theology from Fuller Theological Seminary with a concentration in Christian ethics. He and his wife Mary have been married for 55 years. They have two children and six grandchildren.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

March 2021 Newsletter

Posted on March 2, 2021 by admin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”949″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_custom_heading text=”“A Piece of My Mind”” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:50px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”March 2021 Newsletter” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:30px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

“Once to every man and nation comes the moment to decide,

In the strife of Truth with Falsehood, for the good or evil side.”

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Duty Deaths Back The Badge

“Blessed are those who
maintain justice.” – Psalm 106:3

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

Record-Breaking Line-of-Duty Deaths in 2020

“Under 100” is the on-going goal in law enforcement for annual deaths in the line of duty (LODD). The number of deaths in 2019 was 148. On “9/11” alone 72 law enforcement officers died in the terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center (343 firefighters also died). In fact, some officers still die each year due to “9/11”—24 in 2019.

But the total LODD in 2020 rose to 328—more than double 2019. Why?

COVID-19

Captain Jonathan Parnell of the Detroit Police Department was the first to die of COVID on March 24. The last, on December 31, was Officer Troy Adkins, U.S. Department of Homeland Security – Customs and Border Protection. In between, 208 LODD were from COVID-19. A distant second was gunfire (50), followed by automobile crashes (20) and vehicular assault (13). *

And the total will grow. “In addition, a further 200+ potential line of duty COVID deaths are still pending verification, which means that 2020 may end up being the deadliest year for law enforcement in all of U.S. history.” Officers doing border security and working in corrections account for a very high, disproportionate number of COVID deaths.

Our deepest gratitude and support must go to those in Law Enforcement who willingly expose themselves to danger, including this most unexpected cause of death, in order to protect and serve the people.

* All statistical information and names are from Officer Down Memorial Page.

George Shultz – Quiet Voice of Leadership & Reason

George Shultz, who died February 6 at the age of 100, was secretary of state to President Reagan, among other roles. He was most instrumental in ending the Cold War.

Henry Kissinger, national security advisor and secretary of state during the Nixon administration, spoke of him thus:

His calm demeanor made him influential in interagency discussions. Colleagues knew that when he raised issues, it was out of deep concern. Never seeking personal advancement, always expressing sincere convictions, George invariably became a driving force on every committee.

For all his proximity to presidents and important roles, George was never seduced by the trappings of power. “It’s a great mistake to want the job too much, because then you do things to keep the job that you probably wouldn’t do otherwise,” he once said.

Nothing captures the range of his reflections better than a prayer he delivered in July 2016 for an interfaith group concerned with nuclear weapons: “Dear God, please bring common sense and Divine guidance to our work on the problems that nuclear weapons pose to our world. Man has invented a means to destroy us all. We must George’s eliminate these weapons in order to preserve a sane and peaceful world. We pray for your help as we work toward this goal.”

George’s outstanding attribute was his combination of wisdom and humility. Solomon’s prayer was for “a discerning heart,” and that blessing was extended to George. As a statesman, he would gain the whole world yet never forfeit his soul.

– Excerpts from “George Shultz Had a Wise and Discerning Heart,”
by Henry Kissinger, The Wall Street Journal, February 11, 2021

Picture: Secretary of State George Shultz in 1982 with members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Senator Joe Biden is to the left.

Richard Nixon and the Election of 1960

I became interested in politics in 1960, once standing for hours to be right in front of the podium when John F. Kennedy came to my hometown during the campaign. As a college student in northern Indiana majoring in social studies (62-66), I studied government and learned about Chicago politics a hundred miles up the road.

Chicago was Mayor Richard J. Daley’s fiefdom and, as the story goes, he would withhold votes during elections until he knew how many votes were needed.

Richard Nixon lost the 1960 election by losing Illinois.

In his autobiography Nixon says (p. 224), “Washington journalist Ben Bradlee, a close friend of Kennedy, wrote in his book Conversations with Kennedy that Kennedy called Mayor Daley on election night to find out how things were shaping up in Chicago. ‘Mr. President,’ Daley reportedly said, ‘with a little bit of luck and the help of a few close friends, you’re going to carry Illinois.’”

Many, including President Eisenhower, urged Nixon to contest the election and not concede. Nixon decided not to contest:

A presidential recount would require up to half a year, during which time the legitimacy of Kennedy’s election would be a question. The effect could be devastating to America’s foreign relations. I could not subject the country to such a situation. And what if I demanded a recount and it turned out that despite the vote fraud Kennedy had still won? …I made my decision and sent Kennedy a telegram conceding the election.

Illinois again proved pivotal in 1968—it was well into the next morning when tired network newscasters reported Nixon slightly ahead of Hubert Humphrey in Illinois, but enough to win it and give Nixon the presidency.

Forward to the 1972 election. President Nixon determined that this time, in his final election, his side would give it their all and take no chance on a sliver-close election. One result was an overwhelming victory for Nixon over George McGovern. Another result was a break-in at the Watergate headquarters of the Democratic Party. And, as they say, “The rest is history.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Bible Insight –Servants of God Who Served the People

Three “servant-leaders” in the Old Testament are major role models for us.
First is Joseph. The story is in Genesis 37 and 39-50—the largest segment of the 50 chapters in Genesis. The story starts with Joseph sensing he is a man of destiny. His father dotes on him; his brothers tire of his boasting about his dreams of him ruling over them. Even his dad got irritated at one point: “Will your mother and I and your brothers actually come and bow down to the ground before you?” (Genesis 37:10)

Joseph reminds us of a quite obnoxious form of spirituality—pride over one’s perceived elevate role in the work of God. He will be taken down a few notches before he is matured, chastened, and ready to lead. As a king would later learn, “Those who walk in pride [God] is able to humble” (Daniel 4:37).

Joseph was sold into slavery by his brothers and ended up in an Egyptian prison. Life can be very unfair. But he is eventually elevated to second in the kingdom just in time to lead the people through years of abundant harvests and horrible famine (41:33-40). We could use leaders like this today, through this time of national crisis.

Joseph eventually is reconciled with his brothers who had done him much evil. His father and family moved to Egypt and were cared for during the famine. When his father died, his brothers feared Joseph might now take revenge. Their words of sincere contrition instead brought him to tears and he responded with one of the best statement ever said on how God can fulfill his good purposes even through the evil intentions and deeds of man.

“You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives” (50:20). Joseph speaks timeless words about God’s providence and care for humanity. Using one’s skills, position and resources to save lives and alleviate human suffering is a most worthy way to live—honorable both in the eyes of God and man.

Second is Daniel. His story unfolds in the book bearing his name. He is one of an elite group of Jewish captives who would attain leadership roles in the Neo-Babylonian Empire (626-539 BC).

Daniel and the young Jewish men with him were endowed by God with great wisdom (Daniel 1:17). In time they entered the king’s service (a bumpy, life-threatening experience, as seen by the story of the fiery furnace in Daniel 3). Daniel interpreted Nebuchadnezzar’s dream of a great image and earned the king’s high respect (2:46-49).

Daniel also interpreted the king’s dream that foresaw his seven years of insanity, which Daniel interpreted as a judgment for the king’s pride (“You will be driven away from people and will live with the wild animals…seven [years] will pass by for you until you acknowledge that the Most High is sovereign over the kingdoms of men and gives them to anyone he wishes” (4:25). The discipline came to pass and achieved its purpose (4:34).

Daniel would later interpret the famous “handwriting on the wall” – God’s message of doom for King Belshazzar (6:26-27). That very night the king was killed and his kingdom passed into the hands of the Medes and Persians.

Daniel continued his “public service” under the Persians. He served Darius the Mede loyally and without corruption or compromise.

In Daniel, I see the dignity of public service even though the government was not “Christian” as we’d put it today. The Bible is quite realistic about human government—it is God’s provision for human well-being and safety but also prone to corruption and great harm when it forsakes its mandate for enlightened rule. People of deep religious commitment, like Daniel, can serve the state honorably. Yes, there will be spiritual pitfalls and sometimes those serving on the team may even have to terminate their work (or be terminated!). But the effort is pleasing to God and beneficial to people.

I’m also impressed with how Daniel earned the right to be heard, even to be able to tell a proud and ruthless king what he didn’t want to hear. After Daniel told the king the dream’s warning of his impending insanity, Daniel held out a word of hope: “Therefore, O king, be pleased to accept my advice: Renounce your sins by doing what is right, and your wickedness by being kind to the oppressed. It may be that then your prosperity will continue” (4:27).

Third, we learn about Nehemiah from the book that bears his name—a book worth reading. It describes the work of this outstanding leader, who served as cupbearer to King Artaxerxes and was part of the king’s inner circle.

Nehemiah was greatly distressed when he heard that the walls of far-away Jerusalem lay in ruins—the place that was once King David’s royal city. This was around 444 BC, a century after the end of the Babylonian Captivity. With permission and provisions from the king, Nehemiah travelled to Jerusalem, rebuilt the walls, restored a sense of community in the city, protected the people from surrounding enemies, and revitalized worship and obedience to God.

I’m impressed, as anyone would be who reads the short book, how much Governor Nehemiah was a man of prayer. He is a role model for all spiritual leaders, who stand convicted of shortcomings in our own prayer lives.

His economic reforms and personal sacrifices are apparent in the fifth chapter. Many of his Jewish countrymen had lost their properties (their source of income) and were in debt to those who were economically empowered. Nehemiah listened to their pleas, pondered his course of action, then confronted the creditors: “You are exacting usury from your own countrymen and selling your brothers! Give back their land and houses! Return the money you exorbitantly took from them!” See Nehemiah 5:3-13.

Moreover, Nehemiah did not eat the food allotted to him as governor, thus relieving the tax burden placed on the people by earlier governors. “Out of reverence for God I did not act like that” (5:15). What Nehemiah did do was to invite people to eat at his table—150 of them at a time! And eat well they did—oxen, sheep and poultry with an abundant supply of wine. But Nehemiah refused to tax the people for his culinary enjoyments.

I honor Nehemiah for his enlightened leadership, service to his people and his conservation of the people’s hard-earned tax money. Surely God will honor him too, in answer to his prayer, “Remember me with favor, O my God, for all I have done for these people” (5:19). A fine leader. Politicians should emulate him!

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Religious Liberty Vigilance –
Why I Oppose the “Equality Act” (H.R. 5)

Bill of Rights 21 “No provision in our constitution ought to be dearer to man, than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprizes of the civil authority.”
– Thomas Jefferson

I write this in haste, because the U.S. House of Representatives has just passed H.R. 5 – the so-called “Equality Act.” I plan to say more in my April Newsletter after I study details more thoroughly, but I am compelled to speak out now.

If I had read nothing else in this bill other than Section 1107, I would oppose it on this wording alone:

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 shall not provide a claim concerning, or a defense to a claim under, a covered title, or provide a basis for challenging the application or enforcement of a covered title.

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act protects the rights of religious organizations and individuals to practice their own beliefs and prevents them from being forced to violate those beliefs. Only in a case of “compelling state interest” may a government override the religious practices of the people, and then only by using the least intrusive means.

The “Equality Act” will force significant violations of religious conscience as people of faith strive to practice their faith through their vocations and community ministries. It should be opposed unless it has major revisions.

First Amendment Vigilance – Freedom of Speech

The freedoms of religion, speech, the press, peaceful assembly and petition of government are all guaranteed in the First Amendment. I see these freedoms standing or falling together.

When I taught theology to graduate and undergraduate students I used to hand out a sheet of paper weeks before the term papers were due titled, “How Not to Get a Good Grade on your Term Paper.”

One point: show your biases throughout your paper. I should be able to read an academic paper on theology and not know what the writer personally believes unless he or she says so upon reaching a conclusion. There shouldn’t be shades of bias (explicit or implicit) while the arguments are being built.

So what’s wrong with this paragraph in The Washington Post (February 12)?

Even before the Capitol riot, police officers in the District were exhausted after months of sustained demonstrations for racial, social and political justice, some of which turned violent. Later, there were more violent confrontations when right-wing extremists came to rally in support of President Donald Trump.

It tells us law enforcement in the District of Columbia faced two kinds of violent protests. One was some demonstrators “for racial, social and political justice.” The other was “right-wing extremists” supporting President Trump.

Now, this is explicit bias. “Some” justice people were violent (i.e., most were not); “right-wing extremists” were violent (no qualification as to “some” or “most” or “all”). And wouldn’t those protesters supporting the president think their cause was also one of social and political justice? What if the writer had used the word “extremists” to describe some of the other protesters? The writer is labeling one protest a “justice” cause and the other “extremism.”

Such judgments belong on the editorial page or in the op-ed section, not in the news section. However, the blurring between objectivity and bias has been growing worse for a long time in news media.

Is it good journalism for The Washington Post to report this way? Not at all! Is this paragraph protected by the First Amendment? Yes, in that the government (local, state, or federal) shouldn’t and can’t do anything to prevent it. Newspapers are not subject to government censors and have the right to police their own material, especially by journalistic standards. News media even have the right to mix reporting with judging, but they aren’t being true to good standards by doing so.

I say newspapers and other forms of journalism (especially TV news) need to build a wall between reporting and opining. But I also say they have the right to be biased if they so choose, or they may choose to strive for balanced commentary. Readers and listeners need to grow discernment antenna and wear “bias revealing” glasses to recognize bias for what it is.

But should the government help, either with the reporting or the opining? There are some in the news media and in government who are concerned about the “inaccuracies” of the press. There have been calls for some form of “truth commission”—what we might label “A Ministry of Truth”.

NY Times tech writer Kevin Roose said President Biden should appoint a “Reality Czar” to combat “disinformation and domestic extremism” (Feb. 2).

Horrors! We would have government approval and disapproval of the written and spoken word. We might soon be moving toward government control of published or spoken opinion such as is seen in Communist countries and such as has never been acceptable in this country. Instead, the answer to bad speech is not government judgment, bullying or attempts to control. The answer is free speech. Not less speech, but more.

Disclosures: The above is commentary except when it isn’t. It delivers facts when it says (1) I handed out a paper to students, (2) The Washington Post had a paragraph on protesters, (3) some want government to police the news media, (4) the First Amendment protects the media. Otherwise, it’s opinion![/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Col. John W. Schumacher “A Soldier of God” –
My Personal Tribute

I lost a dear friend in February—one of the most significant persons I’ve known.

Col. John W. Schumacher was a career
(30-year) Army chaplain.

Col. Schumacher saw combat during two tours of duty in Viet Nam. He recalled praying “The Lord’s Prayer” on a field of combat with many an injured or dying soldier. His obituary reads: “He is a graduate of the U.S Army Command and General Staff College, and the United States Army War College where he later was assigned as faculty to teach Ethics. He served in several senior chaplain positions but never forgot serving the soldiers in their units. He is the author of A SOLDIER OF GOD REMEMBERS.”

John once served General Norman Schwarzkopf, who led the “Operation Desert Storm” action liberating Kuwait from Saddam Hussein’s invasion in 1990. The general put in a request for John to be his personal chaplain during that military action, but John’s commanding officer at the Army War College vetoed it because of his valuable role as a teacher of ethics.

After retiring from the military, John served for 22 years as Military Endorsing Agent for my denomination, the Fellowship of Grace Brethren Churches (every chaplain must have an endorsement from an ecclesiastical body).
He also served as a chaplain for three law enforcement agencies.

John had great influence on me personally and on my work as a police chaplain. I was privileged to assist him in his endorsement responsibilities.

John served his country and his God faithfully, for which we all may give heartfelt thanks.

Some Final Words…

Cherokee Nation allows descendants of its Black slaves to attain full tribal membership

The Cherokee tribe’s constitution has contained a “blood clause” that only allowed “descendants by blood” to be tribal members.

“Descendants of black people once enslaved by the Cherokee Nation, known as Freedmen, have long been fighting to win equal status as members of the tribe. This would include the right to run for tribal office and receive full benefits, such as access to health care and housing.”

The “blood clause” was removed in light of a federal court ruling based on an 1866 treaty that laid out terms of emancipation for the tribe’s slaves. The ruling said that Cherokee Freedmen should have all the rights that tribal citizens have.

There are thousands of descendants of black people who were enslaved by the Cherokee Nation prior to the Civil War. The practice of slavery within many Indian tribes is an aspect of the history of slavery in America that is largely unknown or unmentioned. (Source: “Feedspot” for February 26, 2021)

The President is not “Our Commander-in-Chief”!

The President is Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. He’s not “our” Commander-in-Chief, as was often said one way or another during the impeachment process. He does not give orders on what to do or not to do.
At least not yet.

Members of Congress and others should refrain from this designation, even though it suits the purposes of those who use it.

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

Don has been a member of the clergy in the Long Beach CA area since 1970. He serves currently as Pastor Emeritus of Grace Community Church of Seal Beach (where he was senior pastor 1984-2012) and as Senior Chaplain of the Seal Beach Police Department. He previously served as a professor of Biblical Studies at Biola University and chaired the Social Concerns Committee in the Fellowship of Grace Brethren Churches from 1985 to 2019. His graduate work includes a master’s degree in theology from Fuller Theological Seminary with a concentration in Christian ethics.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

February 2021 Newsletter

Posted on January 30, 2021 by admin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”949″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_custom_heading text=”“A Piece of My Mind”” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:50px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal”][vc_custom_heading text=”February 2021 Newsletter” font_container=”tag:h1|font_size:30px|text_align:center|color:%232633ef” google_fonts=”font_family:Bitter%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

Former Vice President Mike Pence

Mike Pence A Man of Honor and Courage
who lives out
his Christian Faith & Values

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Bishop John Carroll A Timely Prayer for our Country—
Then and Now

In 1791 Bishop John Carroll (first Catholic bishop in the United States) issued a prayer for the young country during President Washington’s first term. It is appropriate still today. Key excerpts:

We pray O God of might, wisdom and justice, through whom authority is rightly administered, laws are enacted, and judgment decreed, assist with your Holy Spirit of counsel and fortitude the president of these United States, that his administration may be conducted in righteousness and be eminently useful to your people over whom he presides; by encouraging due respect for virtue and religion; by a faithful execution of the laws in justice and mercy; and by restraining vice and immorality.

Let the light of your divine wisdom direct the deliberations of Congress, and shine forth in all the proceedings and laws framed for our rule and government, so that they may tend to the preservation of peace, the promotion of national happiness, the increase of industry, sobriety and useful knowledge; and may perpetuate to us the blessing of equal liberty.

We pray for . . . the governor of this state, for the members of the assembly, for all judges, magistrates, and other officers who are appointed to guard our political welfare, that they may be enabled, by your powerful protection, to discharge the duties of their respective stations with honesty and ability.

“I urge, then, first of all, that petitions, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for all people—for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. This is good, and pleases God our Savior.” – 1 Timothy 2:1-3

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Bible Insight – Does the Bible say anything about abortion? Is “when life begins” a religious issue?

“If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. – Exodus 21:22-24 (King James Version)

As abortion became increasingly legal in the 1960’s my initial concerns did not rise from any particular religious convictions but from what I learned in my non-religious secular science classes in public schools. There we learned that each human life begins at conception. I had no religious ax to grind.

Later, in my graduate studies as I prepared for Christian ministry I took a class on the Pentateuch (the five books of Moses). The two opening chapters of Genesis speak of the creation of human beings. God breathed the breath of life into man’s nostrils and he became a living being (Genesis 2:7). I asked the professor in class if this might have implications about abortion. He said,
“I don’t know.” (I wonder why some can be so dogmatic about creation but so agnostic about its ethical implications, but that’s a different topic.)

“I don’t know” well sums up Evangelical thinking about abortion in the 1960’s.

life When we moved to California in 1970 and bought a home, we noticed the previous owner left behind an old copy of LIFE magazine—from 1965—titled “Drama of Life Before Birth.” For you younger ones, LIFE magazine was probably the premier periodical of that day. That issue of LIFE would change the focus of my ministry!

“Life Before Birth” said, “The birth of a human life really occurs at the moment the mother’s egg cell is fertilized by one of the father’s sperm cells” and “In the Western world a person’s life is reckoned from the day he comes out of the womb. But the Chinese, overestimating by three months, traditionally counted a child one year old at birth in recognition of the unceasingly active life that has already taken place.” Now, that’s science, not religion!!!

But did the Bible say anything? I could recall some rather obscure verses somewhere in Exodus. Turns out it was Exodus 21:22-24. The verses in the King James Version seemed to suggest that the loss of the unborn (“her fruit depart from her”) might be regrettable but certainly not a major moral issue. After all, the pregnant woman was struck while others were fighting. It didn’t appear to be an intentional thing. The man who struck her must pay an undefined amount. However, if more injury happens (perhaps serious injury or even death to the woman), the punishment would be greater. This seemed to imply that unborn life, while not without value, isn’t equal to life after birth.

The New American Standard Bible (1971 edition and before), used for years in many Bible classes, backed this idea up: “…so that she has a miscarriage…”

But let’s look at this scripture more thoroughly.

The Hebrew language of Exodus 21:22 translated “her fruit depart from her” (וְיָצְאוּ יְלָדֶיהָ – w’yasu y’ladeyha) literally means, “Her children come out.” The same verb as here (יָצָא – yasāh – “to come out”) is used twice in Genesis 25:25-26 for the births of Esau and Jacob. It is also used twice in Genesis 38:28-29 for the births of Perez and Zerah. Thus, the words “come out” likely refer to a premature birth in Exodus 21:22, not a miscarriage. The Hebrew Bible has a word for miscarriage (מְשַׁכֵּלָה – m’shakkelah), used in Exodus 23:26.

Conclusion: Exodus 21:22-24 is “case law” describing the wrong of striking a pregnant woman while two men are fighting. As a result, the woman goes into labor and delivers a live child. Whether she was struck intentional or not, she sustained an injury deserving compensation, and the man who struck her must pay a civil judgment (as the husband demands and as the judges decide). But if there is any further injury—to the child or to the mother—or even death, the penalty must fit the wrong (according to lex talionis, the law of equitable retribution, as expressed by “life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth…”).

This better understanding of Exodus 21:22-24 regards the unborn as having the right not to die or be injured. It does not fully address the current issue of abortion (such as: #1 – intentional abortion; #2 – the father and mother and medical personnel as moral agents; #3 – what laws should say). But it for sure doesn’t mean what I first thought it meant. It is a key “pro-life” text.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Grace Good News from Grace

www.gracesealbeach.org

Generosity during the Pandemic Crisis

“In the midst of a very severe trial . . . they gave as much as they were able, and even beyond their ability.” – 2 Corinthians 8:2-3

The past twelve months have been an incredible challenge to churches, church members and church leaders nationwide.

I’ve been retired for nine years from the senior pastorate I was privileged to hold for 28 years, and where our “church home” still is. Most of us have been cut off from worshipping with our physical presence. Worship inside the church facility has been almost completely cancelled; worship outside has been on-and-off. Most of our “scattered church” worships via the Internet, partaking of Communion weekly at home. As the Apostle Paul would say, not physically present but together in spirit (1 Corinthians 5:3).

I continue to marvel at the loyalty of these people as evidenced by their giving in the midst of this time of economic, social and medical difficulty:

• General Fund giving of almost $1.3 million exceeded operational expenses by $150,000.
• $32,000 was provided to other churches facing financial challenges.
• $50,000 was set aside to assist the start-up of another church.
• Over $7,000 was raised for “Compassion” ministries (above what was already provided in the General Fund).
• $27,000 was received into the “Caring Fund” to help those in need.
• $10,000 in extra donations was added to the General Fund’s Missions Budget of $97,000 to go to missionaries and various projects.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1598373738095{border-radius: 3px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Historic mural Losing “The Peoples’ Capitol”

Historic mural (1 of 8) in the U.S. Capitol by Allyn Cox (1974)

What happened in the U.S. Capitol on January 6 was the worst incursion since the British burned it (and the White House and several other government buildings) in August 1814 during the War of 1812. The federal government had mostly deserted Washington at the time. President Madison fled to Virginia.

My first trip to Washington, DC was in 1960, a 15-year-old with my father. At age 52 he climbed the 898 steps of the Washington Monument at my begging, and back down too. I now appreciate what he did a lot more!

From our hotel adjacent to the Capitol grounds we walked right inside it at the rotunda entrance. We had an excellent tour of the building and saw many of its features. Since no one else at our hotel showed up for the ride, I got a private half-day limousine tour of Washington for $7 (Dad didn’t want to go).

During a 1990 visit I spent hours freely roaming the vast building on my own. I sat for a long time in the Senate balcony, watching proceedings that included Ted Kennedy and other senators I recognized. I rode the rail shuttle to the Senate Office Building with Senator Helms sitting nearby. On a lower floor I encountered retired Chief Justice Warren Burger. Knowing how he hated photographers, I sheepishly asked if I could take his picture and he graciously posed for me, adding “You are very welcome” to my “Thank you, sir.”

In 1997 I did a speaking tour in the area and one day my congressman, Dana Rohrabacher, took me on an underground ride from his House Office Building to the Capitol and then walked me through many of its features, including the front of the House chambers where he cast a vote.

Things changed in 1998, after an armed man stormed through security and killed two police officers. Then enormous change came after “9/11” (the Capitol building was the likely target of the hijackers of UA Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania). You could only move about with touring groups or an approved escort. When my family visited in 2006 the tour was hurried, the features limited, and there was a heavy feel of security. It was not pleasant. That was our last visit.

I don’t question the need for heightened security. I sorrow over the loss of openness at the key building of our republic, “The People’s Capitol.”

Beware “The New McCarthyism”

Today we’d call Sen. Joseph McCarthy (R-WI) a right-wing extremist. During the early years of the Cold War when many Americans were concerned about Communist subversion, he’d sweep away the innocent and ruin their lives as he searched for Communists in high places. “Guilt by association” is a fallacy associated with McCarthyism. The senator (from 1947 to 1957) was finally censured by the Senate for his smear tactics.

Today a “New McCarthyism” is surging in left-wing circles. “Guilt by association” is commonplace. CNN’s Don Lemon said those who voted for Trump voted with the Nazis. By the same argument, all who voted for Biden voted with the Socialists. Did you attend the rally where the president spoke on January 6? If yes, you share guilt for what happened later at the Capitol.

People find their careers cancelled in the private sector if they attended. Some government workers, such as in law enforcement, have become suspect too. But they have First Amendment protection—the right to free speech and to peaceful assembly (at the rally and procession, but not as part of the riot). Criticizing the election process can make you persona non grata fast.

Condemn the rioters and insurrectionists. Condemn those who enabled and encouraged them. Disagree with those who question the election.

But don’t be a McCarthyite.

Don’t Compare the Attack on the Capitol to Kristallnacht

I won’t call such a comparison “anti-Semitic” but it comes close. It diminishes the horror of what happened to Jews in Germany in 1938 and after.

Kristallnacht, “The Night of Broken Glass,” happened throughout Germany on November 9-10, 1938. Reinhard Heydrich, second in command of the SS after Heinrich Himmler, reported 815 Jewish shops destroyed, 171 dwelling houses set on fire or destroyed, and 119 synagogues torched with 76 completely destroyed. 20,000 Jews arrested, 36 deaths reported (source: Michael Brown).

Kristallnacht was throughout the country, not just in one place. The Capitol insurrection is condemned by almost all Americans, but almost all Germans were silent about Kristallnacht or approved of it.

Did the DC Mayor want less or more police presence?

Well, Madam Mayor, which way do you want it?

On January 5, the day before the Capitol riot, D.C. Mayor Bowser posted a letter sent to the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of the Army:

To be clear, the District of Columbia is not requesting other federal law enforcement personnel and discourages any additional deployment without immediate notification to, and consultation with, MPD if such plans are underway. [BOLD mine]

The day after the riot, she criticized the federal Capitol Police for its weak response: “Obviously it was a failure or you would not have had police lines breached and people entering the building by breaking windows.” Then she complained that the federal response to the Black Lives Matter protests were stronger than the response to the Capitol riot.

Does she want Tuesday’s limitations or Thursday’s expansions? It would be hard to find a more self-serving political reversal than this one! Actually, responses to disruptions caused by either the right or the left should be evenhandedly strong.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Religious Liberty Vigilance –
Religious Freedom Day 2021

Bill of Rights 21 “I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises.” – Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Miller, 1808

My Words to Long Beach City Council (January 12, 2021) in support of Religious Freedom Day and its ideals:

Mr. Mayor and city council members, my name is Donald Shoemaker.
I am a resident of the 5th district and I have been a Christian minister in our community for over 50 years.

Each year on January 16 our country observes “Religious Freedom Day.”
On that day in 1786 the Virginia General Assembly adopted the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom. That statute became the basis for the 1st Amendment of our U.S. Constitution and led to freedom of religion for all Americans.

Religious Freedom is the “1st Freedom” in the 1st Amendment. Government is prohibited from establishing an official religion and from interfering with the “free exercise” of religion.

The Coronavirus pandemic has created many challenges to our nation and to our elected officials. Mayor Garcia deserves our strong appreciation and support for his informed and devoted leadership to our city during this crisis.

I scarcely need to mention that government restrictions during the pandemic have fallen hard on religious communities. These restrictions have strained the constitutional guarantee of free exercise of religion and the right to assemble peacefully.

We have seen unfair situations such as in Nevada where gambling places could have 50% capacity but places of worship only 25% capacity capped at 50 persons. In California our churches are shuttered while businesses of questionable essentialness have remained open.

Recently the US Supreme Court has come down strongly for fair and evenhanded treatment of places of worship compared to other venues.

I pray this pandemic ends soon and our new vaccines are effective. Until that day, I call on city and state governments to recognize the essential role of religious communities to our social wellbeing, and to uphold fair and equal treatment of all houses of worship.

Thank you. And my thanks to Mayor Garcia for his leadership.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Mob OC “Mobocracy” is authoritarian, unchristian, and contrary to American ideals, whether it is by leftist extremists or right-wing extremists.

1. It often impedes the free movement of other citizens (in so doing, it can be a form of kidnapping).
2. It sometimes destroys the means of livelihood of the very people it claims to represent.
3. It assumes the right to speak for everyone, when in fact it doesn’t (at best, the will of the mob is anecdotal, not a provable manifestation of the will of the people).
4. It tries to force changes without regard to the will of the people.
5. It impedes and may even prohibit the movement of emergency services.
6. It silences, ostracizes, intimidates and even harms those who speak out with opposing views.
7. It is lawless and violates public order, creating danger to life, liberty and property.

Some Final Words…

Will We Heed a Warning from the Coronavirus Scare?

“The coronavirus will come and go as others will also, but those seeking power and control over innocent citizens will never forget how easy it was to take control of the lives of literally millions of people, by controlling every sporting event, classroom, restaurant table, church pew, and even if you would be allowed to leave your home.”
– Columnist Richard Boddie, Long Beach Press-Telegram (January 3, 2021)

AOC Calls for Controls on the Media

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) thinks the government needs to step up and set the media straight: “We’re going to have to figure out how we rein in our media environment so that you just can’t spiel out disinformation and misinformation.”

To save her some time and help her focus, I’ll mention how she would have to start:
Repeal the First Amendment!

Tossing in Bible Verses Doesn’t Make You “Biblical”!

Speaker Nancy Pelosi read a list of grievances supporting impeachment of President Trump and then added, “The Bible says, ‘Think on these things.’”

Yes, Nancy, the Bible does say that, but you are way out of context. Here is what we’re told to think about—in doing so we will find great peace:

“Whatsoever things are honest…just…pure…lovely…of good report… if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.” – Philippians 4:8 (KJV)

Commentator Leslie Marshall said on Fox News’ “Outnumbered” –
“The Bible says the tongue is mightier than the sword.”

No, Leslie, the Bible doesn’t say that. It does tell us how hard it is to control our tongues (James 3:1-12), which would be a great text to give to politicians. The actual quote is “The pen is mightier than the sword,” spoken by English author Edward Bulwer-Lytton in 1839. It is an appropriate reminder against Islamist terror like the killing of Charlie Hebdo writers in Paris in 2015.

It’s usually better for politicians and political commentators to avoid quoting scripture. But please, when you do, quote real scriptures and quote them in context.

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Blog

Category Archives: Newsletters

December 2021 Newsletter

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

November 2021 Newsletter

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

October 2021 Newsletter

October 12 marks 10 years from the date when eight people were murdered over a child custody dispute.

It was the worst mass killing in Orange County history. It still touches many lives in Seal Beach, including my own.

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

September 2021 Newsletter

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

July-August 2021 Newsletter

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

June 2021 Newsletter

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

May 2021 Newsletter

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

April 2021 Newsletter

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

March 2021 Newsletter

Richard Nixon lost the 1960 election by losing Illinois.

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

February 2021 Newsletter

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

October 12 marks 10 years from the date when eight people were murdered over a child custody dispute.

It was the worst mass killing in Orange County history. It still touches many lives in Seal Beach, including my own.

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

Richard Nixon lost the 1960 election by losing Illinois.

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com Contact: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact me at: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com
Contact: donaldshoemakerministries@verizon.net