December, 2015 Newsletter

“A Piece of My Mind”

December, 2015 Newsletter from
Donald Shoemaker

Advancing Christian Faith and Values,
Defending Religious Liberty for All,
Supporting Civility and the Common Good
through Preaching, Teaching, Writing,
Activism and Reasoned Conversations

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

Evil in the Christmas Story

1Then Herod, when he saw that he had been tricked by the wise men, became furious, and he sent and killed all the male children in Bethlehem and in all that region who were two years old or under, according to the time that he had ascertained from the wise men. Then was fulfilled what was spoken by the prophet Jeremiah:

A voice was heard in Ramah,
weeping and loud lamentation,
Rachel weeping for her children;
she refused to be comforted, because they are no more.
– Matthew 2:16-18 New International Version)

Tears, sorrow, anger, hatred, retribution—these and more fill my heart upon learning of the Paris massacre. Such tragic and evil loss of innocent human life. Before then the attack in Beirut; later the attack in Bamako, Mali. Forgiveness can wait for another day.

Callous disregard of human life for the sake of power is not lost in the Christmas story. The magi asked King Herod where the King of the Jews was born (Matthew 2:1-6). Herod—cunning, ruthless, paranoid—would not take a challenge to his control lightly.

Herod had a reputation for ruthlessness. Caesar Augustus reportedly once said it was better to be his pig (assuming Herod didn’t eat pork and the pig would thus be safe) than his son—Herod killed his sons. In light of Herod’s known cruelty and Bethlehem’s small population of boys under three, the biblical account seems quite genuine. Mary and Joseph and Jesus had already departed the city, having been warned by an angel.

Today’s savage cruelties remind us of Herod time. Many try to flee to a safe country—as did Joseph and his family. Others remain to suffer. And their cries rise up to God.

Human government is ordained by God to punish evil (Romans 13:4) and is divinely empowered with the “sword” to do so. We are enjoined to pray for all in authority that we might live peaceful and quiet lives (1 Timothy 2:1-2).

In the United States, our constitution’s preamble sets forth the governmental duties to “…provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…” Thus, protecting our citizenry at home and abroad through just diplomatic and military efforts is a foremost responsibility of our federal government. To use a seasonal metaphor, keeping our national tree strong and firmly protected may mean that some of the expensive optional decorations on the tree need to be curtailed at least for a while.

“The Ways of God” – what he ordains, what he permits and withholds – are unknown and many philosophical questions surrounding them are insoluble, in my opinion. The Bible struggles often with evil and tragedy and asks the question “Why?” (Psalm 10).

What we do have are the promised comfort of God and frequent reminders of our own responsibilities to open our hearts and bind up the wounded, care for the afflicted, spend our resources on their needs, and serve the cause of justice the best we can. And we have the promise of God’s intervention and just judgment on the Last Day.

Remember these key themes of Christmas in the face of stark human evil.

Good in the Christmas Story

2Behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, “Rise, take the child and his mother, and flee to Egypt, and remain there until I tell you, for Herod is about to search for the child, to destroy him.” And he rose and took the child and his mother by night and departed to Egypt and remained there until the death of Herod.
– Matthew 2:13-15

Joseph exemplifies the responsible husband and father who honors, provides for and protects his wife and children.

Human trafficking, sex slavery, abuse and subjugation of women—all these evils are in sharp contrast to the dignified actions of Joseph. Of special sorrow right now is a news report of the spousal abuse committed by Saeed Abedini, a pastor in Iranian custody whose imprisonment has been widely reported and his release widely sought by Christians internationally.

Recently his wife stopped speaking out for his release and reported a long pattern of abuse.

Naghmeh Abedini canceled all public appearances after telling supporters by email that her husband had abused her physically, emotionally and sexually…
…Since her husband’s detention in 2012 *, Naghmeh Abedini has been publicly advocating for his freedom, winning the support of top evangelical leaders and meeting privately with President Obama, which is why her accusations of spousal abuse came as shock. But those accusations also raise the question: Why do evangelical women wait so long before reporting abuse?
“Many who suffer domestic abuse feel lots of shame, are blamed by others, and do not tell anyone,” said Justin Holcomb, a Florida Episcopal priest and seminary professor who co-authored with his wife Lindsey “Is It My Fault? Hope and Healing for Those Suffering Domestic Violence.”
“Christian women, in particular, stay far longer in abusive situations and in more severe abuse than their non-Christian counterparts,” he added.
[CHARISMANEWS, November 23, 2015]

How does Joseph’s life and conduct contrast with these evils?

First, in keeping with the will of God, he wholeheartedly assumed his responsibilities as a husband and (soon to be) father of an adopted son (Matthew 1:24).

Second, Joseph honored Mary’s virginity (Matthew 1:25).

Third, he protected his family from dangers (Matthew 2:13-15, 19-22).

3Fourth, with Mary his wife, he raised Jesus in accordance with the Law of God. Jesus was circumcised according to the Law (Luke 2:21), and presented for consecration in the temple according to the Law (Luke 2:22-24). His parents nurtured good spiritual habits. Annually they brought him (not “sent him”!) to Jerusalem for the Passover Feast.

Jesus grew up poor and in the backwater community of Nazareth. Still, he grew to be a strong child, submissive to his parents, full of wisdom and grace, pleasing to God and to those who knew him (Luke 2:39-40, 51-52).

Mary’s own Song (the “Magnificat”) proclaimed God’s judgment on abusers of power and his gracious uplifting of the oppressed (Luke 1:46-55).

His mercy extends to those who fear him…
He has scattered those who are proud in their inmost thoughts.
He has brought down rulers from their thrones but has lifted up the humble.
He has filled the hungry with good things but has sent the rich away empty.

So especially in the Christmas season we remember the active goodness of Joseph and the liberating word of Mary. We prayerfully work to uplift the abused and downtrodden. We may need to confess how often we put them out of heart and mind. And consider a donation this season to fight human trafficking and sex slavery.

* It is important to note that Mr. Abedini’s eight-year prison sentence has nothing to do with the abuse accusation, but is because of his involvement with Iran’s growing house-church movement. He is a convert from Islam to evangelical Christianity.

Song in the Christmas Story

A great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying,
Glory to God in the highest,
And on earth peace to men on whom his favor rests.
– Luke 2:13-14

Christmas is the sing-iest season of the year!

4Churches will “raise the rafters” this month singing “Angels We Have Heard on High”. Singing Christmas carols is a cultural tradition. For people who take the Christmas story to heart, singing is a joyful celebration of its message.
It both expresses the message and internalizes it. It motivates the singer to live out the meaning of “Christ the Savior is born!”

Churches will be singing churches if they are truly biblical, Holy Spirit-filled churches. I don’t mean rehearsed singing by a few before passive crowds, but robust singing by congregants. I don’t mean just singing by fine choirs, though I enjoy that and it is certainly appropriate, but singing worshippers. The smartest churches realize most people, including visitors, love to sing traditional Christmas carols.

Keith Getty, author of the immensely popular praise chorus “In Christ Alone”, makes this sobering observation:

6Each week, upwards of 100 million people in America make it a point to attend church, listen responsively to the sermons, and pray sincerely. But when it comes time to sing the hymns, the level of engagement drops hugely and seems to be continuing in its decline, quite dramatically.

I’d like to see this trend reversed in December, as I’m sure Keith Getty would. We can do our part by heartily singing the great Christmas carols. “Hark, The Herald Angels Sing!” is the best! And there are many, many more.

7I also encourage family singing in addition to worship at church gatherings. One way to do this is by setting up the “Advent Wreath” with its five candles. Each week before Christmas one candle is lit. Then Christmas Eve the fifth and center candle. Scripture reading, prayer and singing can fill the home each time.

Officer Garrett Swasey loved Law Enforcement, his Family, his Church, his God

End of Watch-Nov. 27, 2015

End of Watch-Nov. 27, 2015

The Denver Post (Nov. 28) reported: “The police officer slain in a shooting spree at a Planned Parenthood branch here was an evangelical church elder who was the married father of two children.
Garrett Swasey, 44, a six-year veteran of the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Police force, was described as an avid teacher of scripture who played guitar and loved his work in law enforcement.”

As a pastor and police chaplain, I sent a condolence email to his church, Hope Chapel.
I said: “I suspect that Officer Swasey’s personal convictions were not at all supportive of Planned Parenthood. Yet, he fulfilled his sworn oath to protect others and uphold the law. And he lived out the commandment to love his neighbor as himself.”

This Christmas season, as we celebrate beside many we love, let’s be sure to pray for the loved ones and coworkers of Officer Swasey and others who have given their lives in the service of law enforcement. According to the “Officer Down Memorial Page” 115 have died in the line of duty to-date in 2015.

Don’s Upcoming Ministries

5December 24 – Sing “O Holy Night” (duet) in Christmas Eve Services (5:00 and 6:30 p.m.) at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach.

April 1 – Give Keynote Address at New Life Beginnings banquet, St. Mary Medical Center in Long Beach.

Hear My Message: “Healthy Churches Live Out the Meaning of Christian Baptism”
(November 8 at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach)

http://gracesealbeach.org/media.php?pageID=28

UntitledGood News from Grace

www.gracesealbeach.org

Upcoming Special Christmas Programs at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach

December 6 at 8:00, 9:30 & 11:00 worship services—Children’s Christmas musical program by “The G-Kids”

Christmas Eve Services at 5:00 & 6:30

9A Very Merry Christmas to All!

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

November, 2015 Newsletter

“A Piece of My Mind”

November, 2015 Newsletter from
Donald Shoemaker

Advancing Christian Faith and Values,
Defending Religious Liberty for All,
Supporting Civility and the Common Good
through Preaching, Teaching, Writing,
Activism and Reasoned Conversations

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

On “All Saints Day” (November 1) we remember saints of the past—their faith and struggles, victories and failures, lives and deaths, examples and teachings. Here is one:

John NewtonJohn Newton
(1725-­1807)

Slave Trader Convert to Christianity
Author of “Amazing grace, how sweet the sound, that saved a wretch like me…”
Abolitionist

God’s grace is his unearned, undeserved, unobligated favor.

This Thanksgiving be thankful for –

God’s Saving Grace and
God’s Common Grace
By Donald P. Shoemaker
Published in GraceConnect (Fall, 2015)

I was finishing some yard work in front of my home on a recent Saturday morning when I saw them coming—a group of eight Jehovah’s Witnesses. I went to my porch and read the front page of the morning paper and then fiddled in the yard until they reached me. The two who talked to me spoke of the importance of good fathers. So did an article on the front page of my newspaper. In both cases, I rejoice in the grace of God that was revealed!
More about that experience later.

“Grace” is God’s unearned, undeserved, unobligated favor.

Christians are well acquainted with God’s “saving grace”. We usually have this in mind when we speak the word “grace”. But there is another important dimension to God’s grace—his “common grace” to all humanity.

We’ll explore both dimensions of God’s grace. But I will emphasize common grace for it is the dimension we tend to overlook.

God’s Saving Grace

God’s saving grace operates as we are brought into the sphere of faith and forgiveness. Grace is seen in Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross so our sins may be forgiven (Ephesians 1:7) and God can declare us righteous (Romans 3:24). By grace we are saved through faith, which itself is a gift of grace (Ephesians 2:8-9).

Because of God’s saving grace, we sing “Amazing grace…that saved a wretch like me.” No matter how great our sin, God’s grace is greater (Romans 5:20).

God’s saving grace continues actively in us as we walk our Christian pathway “through many dangers, toils and snares.” We are not passive under grace—we must continue and grow in this grace (Acts 13:43; 2 Peter 3:18).

God’s grace especially sees us through our weaknesses, low points, and when prayer isn’t answered our way (2 Corinthians 12:9). It makes us strong and steadfast when we suffer for Christ (1 Peter 5:10).

By God’s grace, spiritual leaders are called to their positions and believers have spiritual gifts (“charismata”—works of grace) bestowed on them for service (Ephesians 4:7, Romans 12:6).

Saving grace is never without good morals. Grace “teaches us to say ‘No’ to ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright and godly lives” (Titus 2:11-12 New International Version). Like a sleek train designed to speed on carefully laid rails, God designs us to do the good works he has already set before us (Ephesians 2:10)!

And on the great day when Jesus appears, saving “grace will lead me home” (1 Peter 1:13).

God’s Common Grace

Common grace is a different dimension of God’s grace. The term is an umbrella we give to a number of biblical thoughts we pull together. Wayne Grudem (Systematic Theology, 657) defines it as “the grace of God by which he gives people innumerable blessings that are not part of salvation.” * People benefit from this grace whether they love God, believe in God, obey God or not.

One obvious common grace is the vast blessing God gives humanity through his abundant creation. “He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous” (Matthew 5:45). “He has shown kindness by giving you rain from heaven and crops in their seasons; he provides you with plenty of food and fills your hearts with joy” (Acts 14:17). God “makes grass grow for the cattle, and plants for man to cultivate—bringing forth food from the earth, wine that gladdens the heart of man, oil to make his face shine, and bread that sustains his heart” (Psalm 104:14-15). And you know? God enjoys every minute of it (Psalm 104:31)!

God’s many ways of keeping our humanity humane are works of common grace. Fundamental to this is the value and dignity that flow from our being made in the image and likeness of God. Because we are all made in God’s image, human life at all stages is precious and must not be taken except as God requires or permits. **

We must treat others respectfully, especially in our words. We can’t bless our Creator and then curse people made in God’s likeness (James 3:9-10).

God has also bestowed to everyone a basic sense of right and wrong. When the Protestant reformers talked about our “total depravity” they nonetheless spoke of this universal sense of morality. The Canons of Dort *** (1619), which articulated the Calvinist doctrine of depravity, also said, “Unbelievers retain glimmerings of natural light that provide some knowledge of God, of natural things, and the difference between good and evil.”

Parenting and family structure show God’s grace. Even unrighteous people want what is good for their children (Matthew 7:9-11). When God permits this grace to be lifted, we see the resulting family and societal chaos.

Human intelligence, creativity, artistry, achievements (cultural and scientific), and wholesome enjoyments are all by God’s grace. All can be corrupted, of course, but this does not change the fact that they are capabilities bestowed by God’s gracious providence.

Another common grace is how God uses human authority to promote justice, punish evil, encourage good, and secure peace (Romans 13:1-7; 1 Peter 2:13-17). No government is perfect—certainly not the Roman government of Paul and Peter’s time. But God works his grace through this instrument of clay and calls his children to honor it, though this doesn’t at all mean that we shouldn’t address the injustices of the state when they occur.

Last, we note God’s restraint of evil, lest the world become even more intolerable and ungovernable. God may restrain individuals (Genesis 20:6) or the whole of humanity (2 Thessalonians 2:7). We don’t know how much God does this, and we must acknowledge much mystery because we see so many instances of ruthless depravity in history and the present.

Should we cooperate with God’s common grace? Absolutely!

• Encourage good stewardship of God’s creation.
• Bless others—just or unjust—with good, as our Father in Heaven does.
• Reason with non-Christians about good and evil, faith and unbelief, and ultimate issues—God is the author of logic.
• Strive for points of commonality with opponents to enhance peace in a diverse society.
• Cooperate with non-Christians for the good of the culture.
• Encourage and participate in wholesome deeds (Reformation thought recognizes the “civic good” unbelievers may perform, though such deeds do not merit salvation).
• Commend good and oppose evil in society.
• Work to diminish grief and suffering.
• Participate in government at all levels.

Finally, remember that if we emphasize either saving grace or common grace and minimize the other, we easily fall into error. Minimize common grace and you may fall into cultural withdrawal, abandoning all efforts in the world except evangelism. Minimize saving grace and become fulfilled in what you accomplish with your non-Christian colleagues and you may fail to tell them the way of salvation.

Now back to the story of my morning newspaper and Jehovah’s Witnesses who came by. Whether from a secular source (the newspaper) or from a religious source not at all orthodox ****, truth came forth. Families hurt and society suffers when fatherhood fails. Where fatherhood is uplifted and strong, people thrive. This truth overflows all secular and religious borders. Strong fatherhood, wherever it blossoms, is God’s common grace at work!

Reprinted with permission from GraceConnect (Fall, 2015), published by the Brethren Missionary Herald Company. The material below is not part of the article.

“God’s Saving Grace and God’s Common Grace”
Bible Quotations and Notes

“In [Christ] we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of Gods grace.” – Ephesians 1:7 (all Bible quotes are from the New International Version)

“[All] are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.”
– Romans 3:24

“By grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works…” – Ephesians 2:8-9

“Where sin increased, grace increased all the more.” – Romans 5:20

“Paul and Barnabas…urged them to continue in the grace of God.” – Acts 13:43

“Grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.” – 2 Peter 3:18

“[The Lord] said to me, ‘My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.’”
– 2 Corinthians 12:9

“The God of all grace, …after you have suffered for a while, will himself restore you and make you strong, firm and steadfast.” – 1 Peter 5:10

“To each of us grace has been given as Christ apportioned it.” – Ephesians 4:7

“We have different gifts, according to the grace given us.” – Romans 12:6

“We are God’s workman- ship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.” – Ephesians 2:10

“Set your hope fully on the grace to be given you when Jesus Christ is revealed.” – 1 Peter 1:13

* Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1994).
Chapter 31 – “Common Grace” (657-68)

“May the Lord rejoice in his works.” – Psalm 104:31

** “Image of God” – “man is like God and represents God” (Grudem, 442)
See: Genesis 1:26-27 and Genesis 9:6

“With the tongue we praise our God and Father, and with it we curse men, who have been made in God’s likeness. Out of the same mouth come praise and cursing. My brothers, this should not be.”
– James 3:9-10

*** Canons of Dort: www.rca.org/canons

“If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him!” – Matthew 7:11

“The authorities that exist have been established by God… [The authority] is God’s servant to do you good…an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.” – Romans 13:1, 4

“[Authorities] are sent by [God] to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right.”
– 1 Peter 2:14

Example of addressing injustice—the prophet Daniel to the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar:
“Renounce your sins by doing what is right, and your wickedness by being kind to the oppressed. It may be then that your prosperity will continue.” – Daniel 4:27
(see also Acts 16:35-39 and Acts 22:22-29)

“Then God said to him in a dream, ‘Yes, I know you did this with a clear conscience, and so I have kept you from sinning against me.” – Genesis 20:6

“The secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way.” – 2 Thessalonians 2:7

**** Jehovah’s Witnesses are outside historical Christian orthodoxy in many ways, major and minor. This group denies the equality Jesus shares with God the Father (John 1:1; John 5:18; Philippians 2:6-11). It rather bizarrely uses the words of Revelation 7:1-8 about “the 144,000” as a regulatory principle for explaining much of the New Testament, such as inviting to partake of Communion only those who sense they are part of the 144,000 (but the Book of Revelation hadn’t even been written at the time these other NT passages were written and first taught). They forbid blood transfusions based on a strange expansion of the prohibition against drinking blood in Leviticus 17:10-12. They refuse to vote or serve in the military, yet they have used the court system to protect their religious rights.

In Ohio, You Are Indeed in Football Country!!!

Untitled 2

My wife and I were in Ohio in mid-­‐October—about 70 miles north of Columbus, where The Ohio State University plays football. And when they do, it’s an all-­‐state event! On football evening our hotel was filled with those who attended the game 70 miles away.

This reminded me of an incident a few years ago, not far from Columbus.

A mega-­‐church known for its flair for things dramatic had erected a giant statue of Jesus 3along a busy interstate highway. Remember, now, this is football country. So when motorists saw the way Jesus’ arms and hands were lifted, the statue was quickly dubbed “Touchdown Jesus”!

Well, “Touchdown Jesus” was destroyed by lightning one stormy night in 2010. A few weeks later I saw the metal skeleton when I drove by. I even stopped at the church and took pictures. And I wrote this little poem…

The church put up a statue—the likeness of her King. She looked for the attention this mighty work would bring.
But the Lord looked down and frowned—burned the statue to the ground, Leaving us to try to say why things in life turn out this way.

Untitled3

Good Government?
Don’t be cynical—in spite of the facts!

In the article on God’s grace (above), I said this about government: “No government is perfect—certainly not the Roman government of Paul and Peter’s time. But God works his grace through this instrument of clay and calls his children to honor it…”

But why do government leaders do so much to make it hard to honor the system?

I wrote to my congressman in October to show my support for the school voucher program in the District of Columbia. It was coming up for a renewal vote in Congress. I wrote this (all emphases are mine):

I encourage you to SUPPORT the voucher program for the DC schools, to help a large number of students get better education. The voucher program provides funding for children, not direct assistance to any particular school, so I do not believe there are any significant church-­‐state issues and the program easily passes the scrutiny of such programs set up by the Supreme Court.

Thank you. Donald Shoemaker

My congressman wrote back:

Thank you for contacting me to express YOUR OPPOSITION to federal funding for private schools. I appreciate hearing from you and welcome the opportunity to respond to your comments.

LIKE YOU, I AM OPPOSED to legislation that would increase federal funding for private school vouchers.

Go figure. No wonder we get cynical about government. We wonder if anyone is really listening to us and why we should bother getting involved!

But don’t give up!

Don’s Upcoming Ministries

5November 8 – Speak in morning worship services (8:00, 9:30, 11:00) at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach

“Healthy Churches Live Out the Meaning of Christian Baptism” (1 Corinthians 10)

A Most Important Thanksgiving Prayer

5“I urge that supplications, prayers, obamaintercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and
quiet life, godly and dignified in every way. This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our 6Savior.”

– 1 Timothy 2:1-­‐3 (English Standard Version)

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

October, 2015 Newsletter

“A Piece of My Mind”

October, 2015 Newsletter from
Donald Shoemaker

Advancing Christian Faith and Values,
Defending Religious Liberty for All,
Supporting Civility and the Common Good
through Preaching, Teaching, Writing,
Activism and Reasoned Conversations

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

The Pope in Cuba

Pop in CubaPope Francis was welcomed to Cuba by President Raul Castro last month. Let’s revisit TIME Magazine’s commentary on the visit of Pope John Paul II to Cuba in 1998:

“A 100-year-old ideology that proposed a collective paradise of social justice and economic equality on earth will confront a 2,000-year-old belief in the eternal power of devotion to the divine and reverence for human dignity.”

“The Pope‘s goal is nothing less than the global establishment of a completely Christian alternative to the once alluring Marxist philosophies of this age. Yet even after communism imploded in virtually every other corner of the planet, Fidel Castro remains faithful, a true believer in a god that failed. ‘History will absolve me,’ he proclaimed at the start of his revolution, and he believes it will absolve him still.

“John Paul II is equally certain that his religion will one day soon sweep away even this last vestige of godless communism.”

The Original Saint FrancisSaint Francis

The Original St. Francis lived c. 1182-1226. His love of and service to God’s Creation has so impressed me that we bought a “St. Francis” fountain for our front yard!

If you are privileged to belong to a church that still benefits from the richness of Christian hymnody, you likely will sing his 800-year-old hymn, “All Creatures of Our God and King.” * I share here two outstanding verses:

Dear mother earth, who day by day
unfoldest blessings on our way,
Alleluia! Alleluia!
The flowers and fruits that in thee grow,
let them God’s glory also show!
O praise ye! O praise ye!
Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia!

All ye who are of tender heart,
forgiving others, take your part,
O praise ye! Alleluia!
Ye who long pain and sorrow bear,
praise God and on him cast your care!
O praise ye! O praise ye!
Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia!

The hymn is in the spirit of Psalm 148, which calls all of creation to praise God—angels, sun and moon, stars, sea creatures, storms, mountains, animals large and small, birds. Then it summons kings, princes, people old and young, men and women, all the saints, and ultimately Israel (“the people close to his heart”) to praise.

“Let them praise the name of the Lord, for his name alone is exalted;
his splendor is above the earth and the heavens.” (Psalm 148:13)

The hymn and psalm both perform the valuable service of calling us to cherish God’s creation while never making the mistake of turning it, itself, into a god.

* This hymn was sung and played magnificently at the September 25 Mass celebrated by Pope Francis in Madison Square Garden.

Message of the Month—“To Heaven and Back?”

Doc Brown: “I just sent you back to the future!”
Marty McFly: “But I’m back! I’m back from the future!”
– “Back to the Future II”

90 MinutesOnce again a movie has emerged about a person who went to heaven and came back to tell the story.

I’m not going to argue, “it happened” or “it didn’t happen.” I simply will set forth two scriptures that rise to relevance in light of claims like this. First:

I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven. Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not know—God knows. And I know that this man—whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, but God knows— was caught up to paradise and heard inexpressible things, things that no one is permitted to tell. – 2 Corinthians 12:2-4 (New International Version)

Commentators generally believe that the Apostle Paul speaks of his own experience, putting it in the third person for rhetorical reasons. Be that as it may, here are some thoughts from the verses:
1. The man with the heavenly experience didn’t know whether this was an “in the body experience” or an “out of the body experience.” Whichever it was, only God knew—it didn’t matter to the man who experienced it! With modern claimants, it matters a great deal.
2. Next to nothing is said about what this person saw or experienced. “Heaven” and “paradise” are the only words used. Drawing doctrinal conclusions from experiences that go beyond what is said in Scripture is always a risky thing to do.
3. The person of 2 Corinthians 12 heard “inexpressible things” and he is emphatic that no one is permitted to repeat what was heard. This man will not be writing any books, giving talks, or making a movie!
This scripture downplays the very things that are important to those who make the modern claims. And there’s one more scripture to ponder…

Jesus told the story of “the rich man and Lazarus” (Luke 16:19-31). In death, the closed-hearted rich man was punished but Lazarus was at peace. The rich man argued for Lazarus to be sent back from the dead to warn his brothers, “You don’t want to come where I am!” He was certain that a visitor from the dead would bring them to a change of heart.

But he was told, “If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead” (verse 31).

The take-home lesson is this: the “evidences and apologetics” value of a “death and back” experience is zilch. The power to change lives comes from the divine message found in the books of the Bible.

A Somber Message for Evangelicals as well as Catholics

“The days of acceptable Christianity are over.
The days of comfortable Catholicism are past.”
– Princeton University Professor Robert George

UntitledGood News from Grace

www.gracesealbeach.org2
www.sealbeach100.com

Grace Community Church of Seal Beach, CA joins its community in October to celebrate the 100th Anniversary of Seal Beach! For over 70 of those 100 years, the church has joyfully served Jesus and the community.

3Grace Community Church has its idyllic location one block inland from the pier, on palm-treed 8th Street.

Don’s Upcoming Ministries

5October 6 (6:30 p.m.) and October 9 (9:30 a.m.)
Teach on the second chapter of Genesis Women’s Bible Study at Grace Community Church.

2 Sundays – October 4 & 11 at 11:00 a.m.
Speak on “Hi-Speed Social Change: How to Understand and Respond to What’s Happening to our Values” (2-part seminar) 11:00 adult class at Grace Community Church.

November 8 – Speak in morning worship services at Grace Community Church “Healthy Churches Live Out the Meaning of Christian Baptism”.

Religious Liberty Vigilance –

bills of rights“ No provision in our constitution ought to be dearer to man, than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of the civil authority.”
– Thomas Jefferson

Recent Thoughts on Kentucky County Clerk Kim Davis’ Refusal to Issue Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

kimKim Davis had been in the Rowan County KY clerk’s office for 16 years working under her mother, the elected county clerk. In 2014 Ms. Davis ran as the Democratic candidate and was elected County Clerk in her own right.

As everyone knows, the U.S. Supreme Court validated same-sex marriage in all 50 states this past June. Thus, the conscience issue for Ms. Davis’ is very recent, filling a tiny, tiny proportion of the time she has served. Could this be a hypothetical comparison? Suppose a Muslim has been an outstanding employee of Starbucks since its inception, but very recently refused out of religious conviction to handle alcoholic beverages in a location now introducing them. Should he or she be accommodated? Or should the new requirement lead to firing if the employee refuses to serve alcohol?

The main difference is, Kim Davis is a government official. As a general rule, I would (1) seek accommodation for her to work in accord with her religious convictions, if this can reasonably be accomplished or (2) suggest she resign her position (many conservative commentators have called for just that).
She, on the other hand, may be convinced that the issue is larger than any one employee’s predicament and thus refuses to resign and must be prepared to take the consequences. I understand that, too. But I do not expect her to prevail in the courts on anything.

As of this writing, it appears that an accommodation is in place though the situation remains fluid. Deputy clerks can issue same-sex marriage licenses; her name will not appear on them. In a free society that sometimes has to balance competing rights, a “win/win” situation is often best, even if not always logically coherent and even if, for sure, each side isn’t fully satisfied.

I issue here a call for consistency. A government official is required to uphold the oath of office that was taken, which in one way or another requires the official to follow the state and federal constitutions and the law. If the issue is same-sex marriage, this should apply to either side in the debate.

So here’s a situation that is comparable, in my opinion. But it is more troubling because of the high government position involved. The California Attorney General takes an oath of office that says (emphases mine):

“I, ___________________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.”

Attorney General Kamala Harris took that oath but later she refused to “defend…the Constitution of the State of California”:

SAN FRANCISCO (March 26, 2013) — Attorney General Kamala D. Harris issued the following statement on today’s Proposition 8 arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court:

“I declined to defend Proposition 8 because it violates the Constitution. The Supreme Court has described marriage as a fundamental right 14 times since 1888. The time has come for this right to be afforded to every citizen.”

Now, on June 26, 2015 five justices of the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with her. But her job as Attorney General was not to make that judgment. It was to defend a provision of the California Constitution in court, like it or not.

She refused to do that. Following her refusal to defend the state constitution, the court found in 2013 that the proponents of Proposition 8 lacked standing before the federal courts.

Furthermore, in citing Supreme Court decisions, she should have looked back ten more years to 1878 (Reynolds v. United States), when the court ruled against the Mormons and said bigamy was not a right.

One can be neutral on both cases but still believe that both the Attorney General in California and the County Clerk in Kentucky are placing their personal convictions above their oaths of office, and the consequences for one should be the consequences for the other. How can one be celebrated and the other castigated?

Theology Insight: Kim Davis’ “Apostolic Church”

Kim Davis belongs to Solid Rock Apostolic Church in Morehead, Kentucky. Here are some facts about this church’s denomination*:

• It is a Pentecostal denomination.
• As a very traditional Pentecostal group, its expectations of its members on lifestyle are very strict **. With almost all other Pentecostals and Evangelicals, it would oppose same-sex marriage.
• It is non-Trinitarian—often called “Oneness Pentecostal” or “Jesus-only Pentecostal” ***. Around 1915 a big dispute over the doctrine of the Trinity split the new (1906+) Pentecostal movement. “Oneness” Pentecostals are a sizeable minority within Pentecostalism.
• “Jesus-only Pentecostals” believe that Jesus alone is God—he himself bears the titles Father, Son and Holy Spirit. (This makes the baptism scene of Jesus taught in Matthew 3:13-17 quite awkward—Jesus must be quite a ventriloquist, to have the Father’s voice sound from heaven while he is in the water here on earth!)
• “Jesus-only Pentecostals” baptize “in the name of Jesus Christ,” taking Acts 2:38 as a verbal formula. They do not believe Matthew 28:19 gives a formula when it says, “baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” For, after all, they believe Jesus bears all three titles.
• These groups separate themselves even more with the claim (argued from Acts 2:38) that a person is saved this way: (1) repentance, (2) baptism in the name of Jesus, (3) receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit (which, by Pentecostal understanding, is evidenced by “speaking in tongues”).
• Bottom line, they teach that those baptized by Trinitarian baptism are not truly saved, and those who don’t speak in tongues are not truly saved (or at least haven’t entered into a “complete New Testament experience”, though I have more often encountered the absolutist position). In my mind, this poses quite a problem because it means that Pentecostals who are baptized by Trinitarian baptism and speak in tongues are not truly saved. What, then, is the source of inspiration for the “tongues” they speak?

I’ve had interaction with “Jesus-only Pentecostals” over the years. I’m open to any new information that would cause me to rethink my observations.

* The denomination to which Kim Davis belongs ( www.apostolic-churches.com ) is not to be confused with the Apostolic Christian Church of America, known for its simple, conservative worship and lifestyles. ( www.apostolicchristian.org ).

** The pastor of a church belonging to a similar denomination once told me that roller-skating was wrong because it was “dancing on wheels”!

*** While the dispute around 1915 had to deal with a supposed “revelation” that denied the Trinity, there’s nothing new about “oneness” doctrine. In early Christianity and at times since, the notion of “modalism” (one God manifest in different modes) has been around. Ask some people in a typical evangelical church to explain God, and you will likely get a few modalistic notions (“I think God is like water—it may be in the form of steam or liquid or ice, but it’s all water”)!

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

July 2015 Newsletter

“A Piece of My Mind”

July-August 2015 Newsletter from

Donald Shoemaker

Advancing Christian Faith and Values,
Defending Religious Liberty for All,
Supporting Civility and the Common Good
through Preaching, Teaching, Writing,
Activism and Reasoned Conversations

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

Two Great Commemorations

• The Magna Carta (800th Anniversary)

• The Declaration of Independence

1“The same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe—the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God.”
– President John F. Kennedy
(Inaugural Address, January 20, 1961)

“This June and July we recall two of history’s greatest documents. As July 4 approaches, 2we recall our own Declaration of Independence. It was rooted in
The concept of a Creator, Lawgiver, Protector and Judge.

Lesser known, of course, is the Magna Carta of 1215. An attempt to bring a modicum of peace between King John and the country’s barons, it was ignored by both sides and nullified by Pope Innocent III.3 Much of it is obsolete in terms of the issues we either celebrate or struggle for today. Nonetheless, it prevailed as one of the earliest ancestors to our Constitution and has legendary status in
the march to acknowledge human liberties.

Of worthy note is the religious liberty upheld in the document’s first point:

FIRST, THAT WE HAVE GRANTED TO GOD, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired.

The American experiment will take it one important step further: there will be no national church established in the United States.

The Magna Carta reflects more the second “prong” of religious liberty found in the First Amendment of our Bill of Rights: the “free exercise” of religion must not be prohibited. There is no chance that a national or even a state church will emerge in America. It is possible, however, for a secular ideology—a counterpart to religious doctrine—to so dominate society that religious freedom (free exercise) is impaired. The bigger the state gets, the greater the risk it will crowd out religious convictions and assume for itself the role of quasi–‐deity, with its own doctrines and commandments.

This would be a secular version of the forbidden “establishment of religion”. I fear this trend far more than domination by any one religious faith. There are other statements in the Magna Carta of enduring value. I note this one (#39), which finds expression in our Bill of Rights:

No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in
any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.

We should not live under the illusion that America is “God’s Country” or a Christian nation. But we would be naïve and ahistorical to ignore the role of religion, especially the Christian faith, in shaping who we are and ought to be as a nation.

For that formative role I give thanks as Independence Day approaches and every time I heartily sing,

America, America, God mend thine every flaw.
Confirm thy soul in self-­‐control, thy liberty in law.

Don’s Upcoming Ministries

5July 21-26 – Attend the Annual Conference of the Fellowship of Grace Brethren Churches in NYC

– Present a seminar: Hi-­‐Speed Social Change: How to Understand and Respond to What’s Happening to our Values
– As Associate Endorsing Agent for Military Chaplains, participate in honoring our denomination’s endorsed military chaplains
– As Chairman of the Social Concerns Committee, present resolutions on contemporary social issues to the delegates of the Conference

August 16 – Speak in Sunday morning worship services (8:00, 9:30, 11:00) at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach

Message of the Month—Should We Forgive?

5Do we forgive the man who massacred nine people at a Bible class in Charleston, SC? We hear calls to forgive. But is forgiveness the gift to offer him? Is it the Christian thing to do?

No, not at all. Christians are called to forgive others as God has forgiven us (Ephesians 4:32). God’s forgiveness is conditional and ours should be too. At a minimum it requires repentance by the wrongdoer—a condition of heart we have not seen or are likely to see in this perpetrator.

Individuals may forgive, but in this case the primary individuals who were violated are not here to forgive. The state is called to dispense justice, not forgiveness. Justice calls for permanent removal of this man from society, should he be found guilty, through one effective penalty or another.

We can comfort and support the grieving in their distress. We can help them overcome 6bitterness of heart and rage and malice, but this is not to be confused with forgiveness. We can pray and work for peace in our country. We can renew our commitment to the causes of justice. We can pray for the murderer’s repentance and for hearts willing to forgive. But no, now is not the time to forgive.

Unconditional forgiveness cheapens the enormity of the wrong and misunderstands both love and grace.

NOTES: Published in the Long Beach CA Press-Telegram June 28, 2015. You may still listen to my sermon on the forgiveness petition of “The Lord’s Prayer”, delivered at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach on March 22. Go to this link and access 3/22/15:
http://www.gracesealbeach.org/media.php?pageID=28

Church on the Move—Loving Its (far off) Neighbor

When an out-of-season tornado smashed through Nappanee, Indiana in 2007, Grace Community Church of nearby Goshen cancelled Sunday services and transported members by the hundreds to do cleanup work. Members could be seen wearing blue “Grace In Action” shirts as they served in Nappanee.

What to do for an encore? The church has responded to many crises. But how about a trip to Iraq?

Pastor Jim Brown was burdened by the terrorism and suffering there and pondered a Bible 7verse, 1 John 3:17, “If anyone has material possessions and sees a brother or sister in need but has no pity on them, how can the love of God be in that person?”

Not exactly known for being stationary, Jim’s response to that verse was most unique. The church raised $70,000 for the trip and for supplies—16 trunks of food, water and medical supplies. A team of eight men from the church was off to Iraq.

8One of many encounters came in the city of Erbil where they surprisingly met 100 of the town’s leaders and, through a translator, explained their mission and prayed for them. “In the middle of ISIS-­‐ridden Iraq, we told these leaders about the hope of Jesus Christ.”

The team would leave many lasting impacts. Just before departing, they responded to the huge refugee problem by renting apartments for 12 families, with plans to do more.

I told Jim, “That is salt and light—‘social concerns’ in a big way, and Beatitude living too—‘Blessed are the merciful…blessed are the peacemakers.’ Thanks for putting vision into action. And setting the bar high for others.”

Jim replied, “We just couldn’t sit there and do nothing. The good news is that we have 41 apartments with over 300 precious people rescued and now connected to a church in Erbil!”

The work continues: “Our church rallied around the cause and gave almost 1/4 of a million dollars… We now have the group of refugees connected to a local church and growing in their faith and new converts.”

NOTES: The “salt and light” metaphors and the “Beatitude” come from Jesus’ “Sermon on the Mount” in the Gospel of Matthew (5:1-­‐16). They describe the impact Jesus desires his followers to have in the world. Information on the trip to Iraq was gleaned from the Spring, 2015 alumni publication by Grace College and Seminary, Winona Lake, Indiana (my alma mater).

The U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision on Same-Sex Marriage—Two Initial Responses

1. Christians who disagree with the court’s decision must commit themselves anew to modeling what they believe the Biblical teaching on marriage is. This is not just simply defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman. It is a life-long commitment that is deep and nurturing and supportive. It is a union that weathers the difficulties and celebrates the achievements. It is a union consummated in sexual union (the “marriage sacrament”) from which God providentially brings offspring who need the nurturing, protective presence of a father and a mother. It is a union that witnesses positively to our faith in the teachings of Jesus and his apostles on marriage.

2. We must passionately and actively uphold the longstanding, though eroding, American commitment to religious liberty. This is not just freedom for “houses of worship” and for clergy. It is for people, whatever their deep religious conviction, to live the tenets of their faith in their public lives without fear of government backlash or penalty or ridicule.

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

June 2015 Newsletter

“A Piece of My Mind”

June 2014 Newsletter from Donald Shoemaker

Advancing Christian Faith and Values,
Defending Religious Liberty for All,
Supporting Civility and the Common Good
through Preaching, Teaching, Writing,
Activism and Reasoned Conversations

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

1Killing bald eagles is excused by the federal government if the poor birds happen to collide with a wind turbine that’s generating electric. But you better watch out if you are a Native American using eagle feathers in a tribal ritual! Robert Soto of the Lipan Apache Tribe found that out the hard way. Read more to see how he stood up for his religious and cultural liberty—and won!

Religious Liberty Vigilance –

2“”Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” – 1st Amendment

My good friend Robert Soto is a pastor in my denomination and a member of the Lipan Tribe of Apache Indians. Here’s what happened…

On March 11, 2006, undercover federal agents interrupted a pow-­‐wow and confiscated 50 eagle feathers from Robert Soto, pastor of the Grace Brethren Church in McAllen, Texas, and member of the Lipan Apache Tribe of Texas -­‐-­‐ a group only acknowledged by the State of Texas. Ever since, Soto, who faced severe fines and imprisonment for supposed illegal possession of the eagle feathers, has been involved in a nine-­‐year legal battle to get back the tribe’s feathers.

Soto says “When it comes to American Indians, it is the government who determines who can or cannot worship God as a Native, as they also determine who is or is not an American Indian. Now they come into our family gathering that we have been having since 1970, and threaten to arrest me…”

Soto continues, “After I was released from any criminal charges, God led me to two Native lawyers in Texas who had never tried an eagle feather case but were willing to try. They stuck with me for eight and a half years until we won the case…”

On March 9, 2015, the feathers were finally returned under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). *

Pastor Soto said, “My faith in God is what has given me the strength to fight for the last nine years and win.” He intends to continue fighting to change laws and uphold Native American rights.

[ * This information is excerpted from GraceConnect eNews where it first appeared and is used with permission. See my May, 2015 Newsletter to learn about RFRA.]

Message of the Month for Father’s Day— America’s Great Need: Responsible Fathers

3“If I’m giving a commencement at Morehouse * …I will have a conversation with young black men about taking responsibility as fathers…and I make no apologies for that.

The reason is that because I am a black man who grew up without a father, and I know the cost that I paid for that. And I also know I have the capacity to break that cycle, and as a consequence I think my daughters are better off.”

– President Barack Obama

The President spoke as a panelist at the Catholic-­‐Evangelical Summit on Overcoming Poverty held at Georgetown University on May 12. ( * Morehouse College is a private, all-­‐male, liberal arts, historically black college located in Atlanta.)

One day over 15 years ago I was driving through downtown Long Beach, California on my way to a meeting of clergy. “Whap! Whap!”—five times something hit the top of my car. It was from a large bird (Godzilla lives?).

I looked at my messy car and thought how I wouldn’t want anyone at my meeting to see it. I turned away from the ocean and onto a residential street and immediately found myself in a minority neighborhood. A group of teens were in the street having (would you guess it?) a car wash!

I pulled up and stopped. They were raising money, they said, for the funeral of a cousin. While they washed my car I went onto a nearby porch where a little boy brought out a chair for me. Filthy rap music was playing from a stereo. Then one of the teens—a girl—brought her new baby out to show me. Soon the car was clean; I gave a donation and left. Not much later I was back in Seal Beach with its $600,000+ homes around my church **.

Many times I have prayed for that baby—now a teen. Many times I have wished I had taken him in my arms right then and had a prayer for him while his mother and others stood around. I didn’t do that, to my lasting regret. Is he OK? How is he maturing? Is he learning wisdom and knowledge? Are there good male role models in his life? Is he going the right way or the wrong way? I don’t know.

I do know that failed fatherhood is growing in America and is rampant in many minority communities. It is the greatest reason, without ignoring others, for young men and young women growing up dysfunctionally—unable to cope in society and unable to handle life’s challenges positively or set goals for themselves. Without positive fatherly role models, boys are more likely to grow up with guns and girls grow up with babies.

Scripture gives us many lessons on positive fatherhood and motherhood. Just read the Book of Proverbs and see the life lessons fathers and mothers teach to the young by word and example. How to earn and spend money; how not to be lazy; how to relate to the opposite sex; how to speak wholesome words; how to handle social pressures and respond to negative situations in ways that are civil rather than harmful.

Through good fathers, we learn what God is like:

As a father has compassion on his children, so the Lord has compassion on those who fear him. (Psalm 103:13)

I’m thankful that I grew up with a good dad and I want God to use me to share a good word and example with boys and girls who could benefit.

I’m convinced that no level of spending or social programming, ever so well intentioned, can compensate adequately for failed fatherhood.

I commend our President for serving on a panel (which is not typically a “presidential thing” to do) and opening his heart and voice on this critical topic (which is not a “politically correct” thing to do, either!).

[ ** I was then serving as Senior Pastor of Grace Community Church of Seal Beach, California, which is one block from the Pacific Ocean. I now serve as Pastor Emeritus of the church. And property prices are now much higher!]

Bible Insight – Key Texts on the Death Penalty

“You shall not murder.” – Exodus 20:13

“You are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand,
foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for
bruise.” – Exodus 21:25

Does the death penalty violate the commandment against murder? The Law of Moses didn’t think so. Exodus chapters 21, 22 and 23 unfold some of the Ten Commandments so we might know how they apply in various situations (case law)—very interesting reading.

For examples:

  • The basic requirement is: “Anyone who strikes a man and kills him shall surely be put to death” (21:12).
  • The death penalty doesn’t apply to unintentional killing (21:13).
  • But the death penalty does apply to deliberate, scheming killing (21:13),
    such as the murders by Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

The “eye for an eye” statement is often viewed as barbaric and uncivilized. Not so! First, it limited the punishment so it was proportionate to the harm done. Even today, punishments may be disproportionate to the wrongs done. On the street, a perceived insult can mean death. Just read the news of the shootout in Waco, Texas last month between rival motorcycle gangs.

Second, the context says, “as the judges decide” (verse 22). The punishments are not meted out by personal vengeance but by a judiciary. There must be a just sentence based on a fair review of the facts (see Numbers 35:12).

Third, a victim might decide that it makes more sense to be paid a fair price for his wound rather than have his assailant wounded in the same way. So a settlement might be reached. This is done all the time today.

But a price could not be paid to compensate for murder. “Do not accept a ransom for the life of a murderer, who deserves to die” (Numbers 35:31).

These words don’t settle “the death penalty” issue. But they should give pause to those who say it can’t be reasonably supported from the Bible.

Tasteless in More Ways than One

Go down, Moses,
Way down in Egypt’s land,
Tell old Pharaoh,
Let my people go. –
Negro spiritual (mid 1800’s)

4It was Passover season, 2015, when I saw this giant piece of matzo bread on display at our local Albertsons supermarket. The text (Exodus 7:16) is the Word of the Lord through Moses to Egypt’s ruler. It is time to end the slavery and oppression of the Israelites and let them leave the land as God directs.

The same phrase had special meaning during America’s time of emancipation of slaves. Matzo bread is a feature of the Jewish Passover meal and of many Christian Communion Services.

It took a few extra moments for me to see what was really for sale. It’s a toilet seat cover! It would be hard to think of many worse ways to trivialize such an important, eloquent, powerful biblical thought on human emancipation. The words are written in “phony Hebrew” script and on a toilet seat cover they have, shall we say, a different connotation.

I wrote to Albertsons but received no response.

Michael Josephson shares a word on cheating…

“Pressure is no excuse for cheating, but it’s a frequent cause. Those who play the stretch-­‐goal game are accountable for the predictable side effects of relentlessly pursuing numbers, especially if they don’t place even greater emphasis on honesty and integrity.”
– Michael Josephson (www.whatwillmatter.com)

Don’s Upcoming Ministries

5July 21-­‐26 – Attend the Annual Conference near NYC of the Fellowship of Grace Brethren Churches

– Present a seminar: Hi-­‐Speed Social change: How to Understand and Respond to What’s Happening to our Values
– As Associate Endorsing Agent for Military Chaplains, participate in honoring our denomination’s endorsed military chaplains
– Present resolutions on contemporary social issues to the delegates of the Conference

August 16 – Speak in Sunday morning worship services (8:00, 9:30, 11:00) at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach

“Lord, I Need Your Help to Forgive!”

You may listen to my sermon on the forgiveness petition of “The Lord’s Prayer”, delivered at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach on March 22, at:

http://www.gracesealbeach.org/media.php?pageID=28

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

 

May 2015 Newsletter

“A Piece of My Mind”

May 2015 Newsletter from Donald Shoemaker

What Happened in Indiana? Religious freedom laws needed — and more civility too!

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

 We’ve all heard the acrimony over the Religious Freedom Restoration Act passed in Indiana in March along with the “fix it” legislation that followed, which supposedly “clarified” the new law.

The whole situation created a legal and social climate totally unnecessary.
And the protection of religious liberty is arguably worse than before.

I wrote a Guest Commentary in the Long Beach Press-Telegram that was published on April 5. Please read it in this Newsletter.

Bible Insight – God’s Providential Care

1“Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? And not one of them will fall to the ground apart from your Father. But even the hairs of your head are all numbered. Fear not, therefore; you are of more value than many sparrows.” – Jesus (Matthew 10:28-31 English Standard Version)

My wife and I have lovely front and back yards (mostly thanks to her hard work!). Roses and orchids and fountains and oranges and seasonal flowers—and many hummingbirds.

It is most pleasant to sit and watch the hummingbirds come and drink from the feeders or service the flowers. Sparrows and mockingbirds and bees and butterflies abound too. As we watch them, we think of God’s watchful care for them—and for us.

Recently I went into the backyard and picked up the remains of a little hummingbird. When birds die, they “fall to the ground” as Jesus described.Jesus’ point is: God cares for even these little creatures of his. Nothing happens without his providential attention.

Here Jesus uses what we call in logic “an argument from the lesser to the greater.” If God cares for the little birds (which he does), how much more doesn’t he care for each one of us—each of us made in God’s image and so much more valuable than a tiny bird, for as Jesus said we “are of more value than many sparrows.”(Some might charge Jesus with being a “speciest” here!)

God’s watchful care for us begins even before we are born (Psalm 139:13-16).

For you formed my inward parts;
you knitted me together in my mother’s womb.
I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.
Wonderful are your works;
my soul knows it very well.
My frame was not hidden from you,2
when I was being made in secret,
intricately woven in the depths of the earth.
Your eyes saw my unformed substance;
in your book were written,
every one of them,
the days that were formed for me,
when as yet there was none of them.

And when we face persecution for our faith, we should trust our heavenly father, who cares for us, and not fear our accusers and persecutors. That’s the key lesson from Jesus’ words. (He teaches the same lesson from the thought that God numbers our hairs—again, God is interested in the little things of our lives. With me, this is quicker counting than it used to be.)

At the end of our lives, God is still there to care (Psalm 23:4):

Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil, for you are with me…3

“God, I thank you for reminding me of important lessons—the value of little lives and the great value of people—each time I watch your little creation!”

(Hummingbird and butterfly pictures are from our yard.)

5“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
– 1st Amendment

“No provision in our constitution ought to be dearer to man, than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of the civil authority.”
– Thomas Jefferson

Religious freedom laws needed — and more civility too: Guest commentary

By Donald P. Shoemaker

PUBLISHED APRIL 5, 2015, LONG BEACH PRESS-TELEGRAM

NOTE: I am adding more information and opinion in bracketed italics throughout this article. The original commentary by itself is available at my Website: www.donaldshoemakerministries.com/blog/?p=512

Great political unity, left and right, religious and secular, led to passage of the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) in 1993. President Clinton signed it into law after it passed Congress with only three no votes.

[The three “no” votes were in the Senate: Robert Byrd (D-WV), Jesse Helms (R-NC) and Harlan Mathews (D-TN).]

The law simply said that the government could not substantially burden one’s free exercise of religion even if the burden was caused by a rule of general applicability, unless the government could show the rule furthered a compelling state interest and did so in the least restrictive way.

[The “compelling state interest” test sets a high threshold—in this case it is“a governmental interest of the highest magnitude that cannot otherwise be achieved without burdening the exercise of religion.” It was applied in earlier U.S. Supreme Court decisions involvingan employee’s right to observe the “Sabbath” (Sherbert v. Verner) and the right of Amish parents to decide their children’s education (Wisconsin v. Yoder).]

Why was RFRA needed? Because of the widely criticized U.S. Supreme Court decision Smith v. Oregon in 1990. The court ruled that the First Amendment’s protection of the free exercise of religion didn’t extend to neutral laws of general applicability that happened to affect religious practices, only to laws directly targeting religious practices.

[One attorney specializing in religious liberty cases told me at the time that this decision rendered the “free exercise” clause in the First Amendment “dead language.” Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion. He called the higher compelling state interest test a “luxury” we cannot afford and acknowledged this would put at a disadvantage those religious practices not widely practiced. I consider his decision to be very “statist”.

Justice O’Connor wrote a concurring opinion, but said that the reasoning in the majority decision was faulty. She added that laws of general application were more likely to burden religious belief than laws actually targeting religion.

Justice Blackmun gave, in my opinion, a stirring and compelling dissent: He argued that the “compelling state interest” and “least restrictive means” tests were “over the years painstakingly…developed…to test the constitutionality of a state statue that burdens the free exercise of religion.” “Until today, I thought this was a settled and inviolate principle of this Court’s First Amendment jurisprudence.”]

[It is interesting that just three years later, in 1993, a city ordinance that directly targeted a religious practice came before the Court. The Courtunanimously struck down an ordinance banning ritualistic animal sacrifices by the Santeria religion (Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah).]

The RFRA was passed to counter this decision. But in 1997 the Supreme Court overturned RFRA’s application to state and local statutes. In response, 20 states with more to come have passed their own versions of RFRA to support religious liberty at state and local levels.

[These state laws largely drew their wording from the original federal RFRA. Indiana’s law went beyond the federal law in a couple of ways, such as including a company, corporation, religious institution and other entities in the definition of a “person.” Legal articles differ on whether these were substantial expansions. But they certainly became part of the objections from businesses and the heated protests against Indiana’s law!]

[The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, passed in 2000, was another response to the overturning of RFRA. It gave property dedicated to religious purposes certain protections against local zoning restrictions. It also sets forth a broad understanding of what “religious exercise” is: “any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief.”

Based on this religious land use law, an LGBT-affirming church in Bellflower, CA won a $1,750,000 settlement with the city on April 13, 2015. This ended the city’s insistence that the church provide a large number of parking spots while the city exempted a mortuary and a fire museum from the same parking regulation.]

What has happened to take us from the unity of 1993 to the acrimony of today? Why the intense opposition to Indiana’s new law? I offer two opinions and three proposals toward civility (but no longer unity).

First, I have watched erosion of support for religious liberty along with a growing lack of understanding of how important religious beliefs are to their adherents. Religion isn’t just an add-on that can be easily shelved. It is a sense of the Ultimate that goes to the core of one’s identity and conduct. Consciences formed by religious faith should not be burdened by the state (to require what faith forbids, or to forbid what faith requires), except in rare circumstances.

[Note the quote from Thomas Jefferson above. By “rare circumstances” I mean issues where the government can satisfy the “compelling state interest” test.

Negative secular reaction to the Supreme Court’s “Hobby Lobby” decision in 2014 is a prime example of eroding support for religious liberty. This decision was based on RFRA, not on First Amendment rights. Hobby Lobby is wholly owned by a deeply religious family who claimed the contraception mandate in Obamacare would obligate them to violate their core religious beliefs.

Additionally, we often hear government leaders speak of “freedom of worship” rather than the more expansive concept of “freedom of religion,” which certainly must include the right to live out your faith in the public arena. Exemptions to government edicts are talked about for “houses of worship” and clergy but not for other religious entities like church owned/operated schools, hospitals, and social agencies. Nor are religious laypeople given the exemptions that clergy have. Are they less “religious”?]

Second, LGBT issues were not on the table when the original RFRA was passed. The interfacing of these issues with many traditional religious beliefs has not been gentle, to say the least. Both sides are wary of the other. And those with religious convictions contrary to same-sex marriage are now moved to prevent violation of their own consciences.

[This is not to say that there were no LGBT issues at that time. Remember the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy? But I doubt there was any reference to LGBT issues when the original RFRA was passed.]

Now I have three proposals for navigating these troubled waters with civility. The first is a call for clarity. Have critics and proponents of Indiana’s RFRA taken the time to read it? To read dispassionate analyses? The acrimony of recent days has been long on harsh polemic and short on clarity.

The second is a call for conversation. Are we talking to the other side and learning what each side’s concerns and understandings are? Or are we convinced we already know all the facts and what motivates the other side? An anti-gay sign, “God is your enemy,” and a sign held up in Indiana saying, “God and Muhammad are not real — your hate is,” are conversation stoppers, not promoters of civil discourse.

[Who can speak likehe or she is an expert on the motives in the hearts of others? Arguments that are “ad hominem”—labeling the person rather than addressing the issue—should be challenged as such whenever they are used.]

I’m an evangelical Christian with deep concerns over freedom of conscience issues. I can articulate these. I can also listen to perceptions others have about religious domination and laws they see as promoting discrimination.

A call for candor is third. However religious freedom laws address discrimination, the fact is these laws provide a defense that says, “Not so fast! The free exercise of my faith is being burdened and you have hurdles you must achieve before it can be limited.” Proponents should acknowledge this.

Critics should not charge that RFRA is a blank check for wide discrimination by those who merely use religion as a veneer. Nor should they ignore the burdening of the free exercise of religion taking place, probably to a degree the nation’s founders never intended.

The need for restoration of religious freedom shouldn’t exist, but it does. Robust religious liberty is our heritage. It must flourish alongside disagreement, neither suppressing nor being suppressed by the other.

Donald P. Shoemaker is pastor emeritus of Grace Community Church of Seal Beach

Don’s Recent &Upcoming Ministries

4“Lord, I Need Your Help to Forgive!”

You may listen to my sermon on the forgiveness petition of “The Lord’s Prayer”, delivered at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach on March 22, at:

http://www.gracesealbeach.org/media.php?pageID=28

April 15 – Lead a discussion on clergy-congregant relationships at the Long Beach Religious Leaders Association

April 28 (6:30 p.m.) and May 1(9:30 a.m.) – Speak at women’s Bible study groups at Grace Community Church on Matthew 28:16-20 (the “Great Commission” Jesus gave)

Johann Sebastian Bach’s Mass in B-Minor

5Magnificent 75-voice chorale, splendid chamber orchestra, superb soloists—such was the treat when the Long Beach Chorale and Chamber Orchestra presented Bach’s majestic, Christ-honoring work on April 18-19.

Thanks to these fine singers and musicians for the excellence. As for Bach himself, I say as he would say,

Soli Deo gloria—to God be the glory.”

A very blessed and joyous springtime to all.

And a prayer of thanks for our mothers on May 10!

“A woman who fears the Lord is to be praised.”

– Proverbs 31:30

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

 

April 2015 Newsletter

“A Piece of My Mind”

March 2015 Newsletter from Donald Shoemaker

Advancing Christian Faith and Values, Defending Religious Liberty for All, Supporting Civility and the Common Good through Preaching, Teaching, Writing, Activism and Reasoned Conversations

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

Easter’s Message – Suffering and Hope

“[Jesus] humbled himself and became obedient to death—even death on a cross! Therefore God exalted him to the highest place…” – Philippians 2:8-9

Easter gives a message of great hope. But the season also speaks of humility, sacrifice and death. The glory awaits us in the future; the sacrifice is now.
We must not forget this order. We don’t get a pass on faithfulness today.

1Christian martyr and true German patriot Dietrich Bonhoeffer knew this lesson. In The Cost of DiscipleshipBonhoeffer wrote: “Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, Communion without confession, absolution without personal confession. Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate.”

Bible Insight – “Forgive us our sins”

“Forgive us our debts as we also have forgiven our debtors.”
“For if you forgive others their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you, but if you do not forgive others their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” – Matthew 6:12, 14 & 15 (English Standard Version)

This remarkable prayer request in The Lord’s Prayer asks God to liberate us from one of the greatest human burdens—“How can I be forgiven for all the wrongs I have done?” These wrongs are summed up in the confession of The Book of Common Prayer, “We have not loved [God] with our whole heart;we have not loved our neighbors as ourselves.”

The request to be forgiven is not a free “get out of jail” pass. It places an obligation on the person praying. We are asking God to forgive us up to the level of our willingness to forgive others. It would be hypocritical of us to ask God to do more for us than we are willing to extend to others. So the prayer obligates us to forgive even as it beseeches God to grant us forgiveness. (Read a powerful story Jesus told on this point in Matthew 18:23-35.)

American Evangelical Christianity widely teaches that forgiveness should be unconditional. * “As soon as someone wrongs you, immediately forgive that person in your heart.” The point is, forgiveness is something you do for yourself (a therapeutic act so you will feel better), rather than something you do for others (a relational act so reconciliation may occur). Look at these slogans, which are posted as Bible thoughts on forgiveness for goodness sake:

2    3

The slogans and their “therapeutic forgiveness” have an important point to make. Why let someone’s wrong against you tear you up inside and fill you with bitterness? Why give this person a double victory?

Scripture addresses this:

“Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice.” – Ephesians 4:31

This indeed must be done, for these negatives can ruin us. But to deal with them is different from forgiving others. Forgiving others is done so relational “shalom” might occur—interpersonal healing, restoration and peace.

Forgiveness is discussed in the next verse (Ephesians 4:32):

“Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.”

God forgives us “in Christ”. In this dynamic God’s forgiveness is very conditional—dependent on the sacrifice of Christ for the sins of the world, and dependent on our embracing of God’s offer of forgiveness.

“The tax collector, standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, a sinner!’I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.” – Jesus (Luke 18:13-14)

Here’s what Jesus said about conditionalforgiveness of others:

“If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him, and if he sins against you seven times in the day, and turns to you seven times, saying, ‘I repent,’ you must forgive him.” – Luke 17:3-4

God’s conditional forgiveness is taught later in the New Testament (1 John 1:9):
“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins.”

What reasonable steps of contrition should we expect to see before forgiveness can be granted and a wholesome situation of “shalom” restored? I suggest at least these four signs if someone is serious about being forgiven:

1. Remorse – “I am truly sorry.”

2. Repentance – “From the heart I confess to you that I did wrong.”

3. Restitution– “I am willing to do what I must to make things right.” (This point should be kept flexible—it is as much an accountability lesson for the offender as it is a payment to the person wronged.)

4. Resolve–“By God’s strength, I will not do this again.” (Fact is, we may. That’s what requires the “seven times a day” forgiveness Jesus taught. But the resolve needs to be sincerely made.)

* A “forgiveness” quote from Dietrich Bonhoeffer (top page): “”Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance.”

4Good News from Grace

www.gracesealbeach.org

It was my privilege to speak at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach on March 22, with the sermon “Lord, I Need Your Help to Forgive!”

You may listen to this sermon at:

http://www.gracesealbeach.org/media.php?pageID=28

Good Friday Communion Services at Grace Community Church: Noon (in cooperation with 1st United Methodist Church) and 7:00 p.m.

Easter Morning Services: 8:00, 9:30 (2 services) and 11:00 (2 services)

Reflect on the meaning of Jesus’ death and celebrate his resurrection at gatherings where these are truly believed and made central in people’s lives.

5“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
– 1st Amendment

“To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical.”
– Thomas Jefferson (Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom)

Threat to Religious Freedom in San Francisco

Good for Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco! He actually believes that a Catholic school should teach and practice what that religion believes.6

Many parochial schools have wandered from this and allowed the goal of giving a good educationreplace the goal of inculcating the teachings and values of the sponsoring church. The parents don’t mind a crucifix on the wall so long as faith and values aren’t stressed. A pastor or bishop who tries to turn the school back to its proper mission is in for headaches and opposition—in this case from the teachers’ union and politicians.

Archbishop Cordileone wants teachers who will stand for those teachings, not apologize for them, and do so with compassion.“We don’t want kids mouthing what we tell them to say. We want them to believe it. But to believe it they need living, breathing examples of people that are fulfilled living this, and they exist!”

That a religious school should be free in America to teach the faith and values it embraces should be a no-brainer. Unfortunately, it isn’t.

Politicians, in disregard of the separation of church and state, have come out against the archbishop:
• The 11-person Board of Supervisors of San Francisco has unanimously approved a resolution opposing the archbishop’s policy.
• Eight California lawmakers have written a letter of opposition.

What an intrusion into religious conviction and expression! Turn the tables and imagine this—what if nineteen bishops high-pressured San Francisco’s government one way or the other on some non-religious issue? Listen and you will hear loud howling on how the “wall of separation” is being violated! *

In a written reply, the archbishop challenges the legislators, asking them:
“Would you hire a campaign manager who advocates policies contrary to those that you stand for, and who shows disrespect toward you and the Democratic Party in general?”

Joan Desmond asks in the National Catholic Register, “What is the primary mission of a Catholic high school?” All churches, Protestant or Catholic, need to ask this question about their educational institutions. If they have wandered ‘off mission’ they must be called back and held accountable.**

And the government’s job is to support their freedom to do so, not erode it.

* Actually the First Amendment prohibits the government from interfering with the free exercise of religion. It safeguards the right of the citizens (including citizens who act collectively such as througha church) to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

* *If the church did allow its schools to slip “off mission” and “off message”, this is a warning to all religious schools. Much easier to keep strong in message and values than to let these things get diluted over the years and then try to restore them. Still, restore them they must (they needn’t choose between good values and good education). Otherwise, close the schools, save your money, and let the public system or secular private schools do the task of education.

From Michael Josephson –

“Whether it’s sports, business or politics, whenever we divorce issues of competence from issues of character, we create a class of amoral professionals who think they’re exempt from common standards of honor and decency. This discredits and demeans the moral standing of everyone involved.

Our Prayer for Good Friday (Matthew 6:9-13 ESV)

“Our Father in heaven,
hallowed be your name.

Your kingdom come,
your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.

Give us this day our daily bread,

and forgive us our debts,
as we also have forgiven our debtors.

And lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil.”

Friends and Colleagues,

Here are some items I hope you will find of interest in my April Newsletter:

Easter’s Message – Suffering and Hope. Dietrich Bonhoeffer understood that being a follower of Jesus means suffering is often our lot in life now. Hope is fully realized in the life to come. That’s a lesson from Good Friday and Easter.

Bible Insight – “Forgive us our Sins.” This request in The Lord’s Prayer seems so simple. But the condition attached to it makes it a serious challenge. Does the Bible, after all, teach conditional or unconditional forgiveness? If conditional, what are these conditions?

Religious Liberty VigilanceThreat to Religious Freedom in San Francisco. As the Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco works to restore the centrality of church beliefs and values in Catholic parochial schools, he is being severely opposed—by politicians! Why would they interfere in church matters this way?

You may listen to my March 22 sermon on the “Forgiveness” petition in The Lord’s Prayer by following this link: http://www.gracesealbeach.org/media.php?pageID=28

I pray for a meaningful Good Friday and Easter for you, and every best wish for a joyous spring season.

Don

PS – Feel free to forward this Newsletter to others. More free signups welcome! And if, for any reason, you no longer wish to receive it, simply reply with the word “UNSUBSCRIBE” in the Subject line and I will quickly honor your request.
www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

March 2015 Newsletter

“A Piece of My Mind”

March 2015 Newsletter from Donald Shoemaker

Advancing Christian Faith and Values, Defending Religious Liberty for All, Supporting Civility and the Common Good through Preaching, Teaching, Writing, Activism and Reasoned Conversations

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

 

“The moment your past becomes more exciting than your future, is the day you start to die.”
– Coach John Wooden

“Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead, I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus.”
– The Apostle Paul, looking forward in his own Christian experience and ministry (Philippians 3:13-14 NIV)

 

Religious Liberty Vigilance –

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
– 1st Amendment

“No provision in our constitution ought to be dearer to man,
than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprizes of the civil authority.”
– Thomas Jefferson

 

Atlanta’s Fire Chief Dismissed over his Religious Views on Sexual Behavior

Fire Chief Kelvin Cochran

I take no pleasure in writing these words. And my intent is to write with the greatest of care and sensitivity. But what I say needs to be said—and said and said again. Once again we see a sign that our society is moving from being a free society to a “correct” society.

(Former) Fire Chief Kelvin Cochran serves as a deacon in his Baptist church. He self-published a book titled “Who Told You that You Are Naked?” (a take from God’s question to Adam in the account found in Genesis 3 about Adam and Eve eating the “forbidden fruit”). The book was based on lessons he had given to men’s groups at his church. In the book, Cochran expressed traditional biblical understandings of sexuality and marriage and spoke against other understandings, including same-sex unions.

I have not read the book. Nor can I speak to the charges that:

  • Cochran did not receive approval to publish the book from the city’s ethics officer (he said he received verbal clearance to publish);
  • Cochran spoke to the media on the issue during his 30-day suspension, in violation of an order not to do so (he said he didn’t);
  • Cochran distributed copies of his book to some members of the fire department (he said he gave copies to a group of Christians).

For these, Mayor Kasim Reed fired Chief Cochran in January. These are all “the mayor said/the chief said” matters. The fired chief sees religious discrimination; the mayor says the chief’s judgment, not his religion, led to his dismissal. This much I will say:

  1. Whatever may be true about the mayor’s opinion, I have no doubt the chief’s opinion is correct. He has been punished for expressing his religious views.
  2. It is odious and unacceptable that any government employee who writes on a religious topic should have to consult with and get prior approval from a government official. * This “prior restraint” censorship violates the deeply-held principle of separation of church and state. The Supreme Court once said, “The law knows no heresy,” and courts have said again and again that the state has neither the right nor the qualifications to judge religious teachings.
  3. Even if the mayor was correct and the chief was in error in any of the above charges, this calls for reprimand, not removal.
  4. The key issue is not what the chief’s religious views are on hotly debated sexual topics. It is whether or not he can do his job. Only if the first prevents the second is there a basis for government action. And the burden of proof should rest on the state, not on the person with religious convictions. **

On this point, I find this statement by Americans United for Separation of Church and State absolutely ludicrous: “No one is saying Cochran doesn’t have a right to his beliefs, despicable though they are. But his beliefs called his ability to do his job into question. What if a local gay bar were on fire? Would Cochran do his best to make sure the fire department responded quickly? Given his obvious bias toward gays, it’s hard to say.”

No, it’s not “hard to say”!!! Put it this way. Suppose the chief strongly believed, as many people of religious conviction do, that married couples should be “one in faith” rather than divided over religion. Then suppose he said, “I will not hire any firefighter whose home has mixed religious beliefs in it,” and, “If their home catches on fire, they had better look for help elsewhere.”

Such dereliction of duty should get one fired. But public servants know that you never treat the public this way.

After the murders of newspaper workers in Paris, CBS news anchor Scott Pelley made this exceptional commentary at the end of a broadcast (Jan. 9):

  • Someone asked us today if the French magazine acted irresponsibly, publishing cartoons of the Prophet Mohamed. “Couldn’t all of this been avoided if Charlie Hebdo had been more sensible?”
  • …Why are freedom to publish and freedom to speak absolute? Because there is no democracy without journalism.
  • …Silence is the end of freedom.

That’s right. Freedom of speech, freedom to publish, and freedom to believe as you choose and then to exercise those beliefs—all are foundational to our constitutional democracy. Without them, liberty is lost.

  • * Obviously, a government employee who expresses a religious or controversial opinion is speaking for himself and not for the government entity where he works. This needs to be clearly understood and sometimes needs to be stated. A government agency may require advance approval of outside employment, but this must not extend to a judgment about the religious content of a written work or speech.
  • ** If the accused demonstrates that his convictions arise from sincerely-held religious beliefs, the government should have the burden to demonstrate that these beliefs clearly prevent him from doing his job, that it has a compelling state interest in restricting his free exercise of religion and that there are no lesser means of discipline that would accomplish the state’s legitimate ends.
 

Don’s Upcoming Ministries

March 3 – Speak at the Long Beach Rescue Mission’s 7:00 p.m. Chapel Service

March 21 – Sing the National Anthem at the start of Seal Beach’s 5/10K Race (8:00 a.m.).

March 22 – Speak on the “forgiveness” petition of The Lord’s Prayer in Sunday Morning Worship Services at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach (8:00, 9:30, 11:00)

April 19 – Speak to the High School ministry at Grace Community Church on Acts 17:16-34, the Apostle Paul’s message in Athens on Mars Hill (9:30 a.m.)

 

Bible Insight – “The Ten Commandments”

(See Exodus 20:2-17 at the end of this newsletter)

ABC news correspondent Ted Coppell once said, “What Moses brought down from Mt. Sinai were not the Ten Suggestions, they are Commandments. Are, not were. The sheer brilliance of the Ten Commandments is that they codify, in a handful of words, acceptable human behavior. Not just for then or now but for all time.”

The Ten Commandments are presented to us in Scripture this way:

  1. They were given by God.

    “And God spoke all these words…” (Exodus 20:1)

    Like it or not, if you strip the presence of the “God who speaks” from the ethical values of the Ten Commandments, they lose their moral power. Ethics without God is just one man’s (or philosophy’s) opinion against another’s.

  2. They were given by God to his chosen people.

    “Moses went up to God, and the Lord called to him from the mountain and said, ‘This is what you are to say to the house of Jacob and what you are to tell the people of Israel'” (Exodus 19:3)

    While the whole human race benefits by obeying these commands, and while a society benefits when these commands are inculcated into its culture (respect for life, respect for parents, respect for property, etc.), as a “set of commands” they are an inseparable feature of God’s covenant relationship to his people. Thus, a secular society misses the point if it tries to post The Ten Commandments in public classrooms or on monuments as a moral code.

  3. They were given by God to his chosen people whom he had saved by his grace.

    “You yourselves have seen what I did to Egypt and how I carried you on eagles’ wings and brought you to myself” (Exodus 19:4).

    The people were to obey these commands not so they gain salvation, but because they have already experienced salvation (deliverance from slavery). The Ten Commandments, properly understood, cannot be pitted against the forgiving grace of God and life under the grace of God.

  4. They were “covenant expectations”.

    “Now if you obey me fully and keep my covenant, then out of all nations you will be my treasured possession…a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:5-6; see 1 Peter 2:9).

    Israelites were to obey the commandments not as a condition for entering a special relationship with God, but to continue in the blessings and benefits of that relationship. Departing from the commandments means hardship, loss, pain and bondage—no matter how good things once were when the commands were held high.

  5. They are further explained in “case law” – how they should apply in specific situations.
    (See especially Exodus 21-23)

    “A thief must certainly make restitution” (Exodus 22:3). Imagine how this principle would impact the cause of justice if it were widely applied!

    “If a thief is caught breaking in and is struck so that he dies, the defender is not guilty of bloodshed. But if it happens after sunrise, he is guilty of bloodshed” (Exodus 22:2). Not all killing is murder—people may justifiably defend lives and property. But you cannot kill a thief in just any situation.

    “Anyone who strikes a man and kills him shall surely be put to death. However, if he does not do it intentionally…he is to flee to a place I will designate. But if a man schemes and kills another man deliberately, take him away from my altar and put him to death” (Exodus 21:12-14). This shows many principles: (1) when a society executes a murderer, that act of killing is not itself an act of murder; (2) if a killing is unintentional, the person who caused the death is not treated as a murderer; (3) premeditated murder is the primary prohibition in the commandment “You shall not kill”.

    Telling the truth? “Do not spread false reports… When you give testimony in a lawsuit, do not pervert justice by siding with the crowd, and do not show favoritism to a poor man in his lawsuit” (Exodus 23:1-2). “Do not bear false witness” is obeyed through nurturing a strong passion for truth.

    Respecting property rights? Obedience to the “do not steal” commandment has its positive side: you must do what you can to restore property that the owner has lost—even if you don’t particularly like the guy (“your enemy”)! See Exodus 23:4.

  6. Human nature tries to justify breaking the commandments through moral chicanery, tricks, traditions, qualifications and justifications.

    “God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’… But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is ‘devoted to God,’ they are not to ‘honor their father or mother’ with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition” (Jesus’ teaching on observing Law over tradition in Matthew 15:4-6).

  7. In Bible times, prophets and teachers of the Law (supremely Jesus) applied The Ten Commandments to new situations and called for them to be kept sincerely and correctly from the heart. Every generation of those who claim to know God has to apply them to new situations without departing from their original intent.

The Ten Commandments must be applied afresh as people find new and creative ways to break them. In fact, in our rapidly changing world, they need to be renewed each decade, to see if we are keeping them as God intended.

By all means, learn The Ten Commandments!

 

A Tribute to Pro-Life Activist
Dr. John Willke—

Obstetrician John Willke and his wife, Barbara, became the voices of the pro-life movement when they wrote the Handbook on Abortion. First published in 1971 and with 1.5 million sold, it became “The Text” for pro-life activism (I won’t say, “The Bible of the Pro-life Movement” because the Bible is the Bible of the Pro-life Movement).

In 1972, when Protestant Evangelical pro-life convictions were nominal to non-existent, I gave a sermon on abortion that proved to be seminal and grew into a booklet called Abortion, the Bible and the Christian. Dr. Willke often promoted this booklet, and it was published by the tens of thousands.

He was a selfless, caring, wise, focused leader. I worked with him personally in 1980, the year he became President of the National Right to Life Committee and I was General Chairman of its national convention at the Anaheim Convention Center. I observed him as a devout Roman Catholic Christian who refused to compartmentalize his faith inside church walls (in its earliest years, the Right to Life movement was almost all devotedly Catholic).

John died February 20 at the age of 89. Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine on February 21 praised Willke as a worldwide leader in the right to life movement who brought great passion to the mission to protect the unborn.

 

Appendix – The Ten Commandments

Highly recommended: Listen to the free 11-part study (5 minutes each) of The Ten Commandments by Dennis Prager.
Connect to: www.prageruniversity.com

Exodus 20:2-17 © New International Version

2 “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.

3 “You shall have no other gods before me.

4 “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.

7 “You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.

8 “Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. 9 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 10 but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns. 11 For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.

12 “Honor your father and your mother, so that you may live long in the land the Lord your God is giving you.

13 “You shall not murder.

14 “You shall not commit adultery.

15 “You shall not steal.

16 “You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.

17 “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.”

February 2015 newsletter

“A Piece of My Mind”

February 2015 Newsletter from Donald Shoemaker

Advancing Christian Faith and Values, Defending Religious Liberty for All, Supporting Civility and the Common Good through Preaching, Teaching, Writing, Activism and Reasoned Conversations

www.donaldshoemakerministries.com

 

Thoughts on the Ethics of Abortion 42 Years after Roe v. Wade (January 22, 1973)

 

When they were living, my aunt and uncle resided in a fine California retirement community. During a visit with them, I was taken by my uncle on a tour of the community’s nearly completed state-of-the-art facility for Alzheimer patients.

We looked inside one room that would soon house a patient. There was no mirror in the bathroom for there was no need for a mirror. The patient who would eventually stay there would not know who he or she is.

Relatives of the patients would be able to visit with them in a comfortable sitting area. But there would be no depth of communication, for the Alzheimer patient eventually has no capacity for an “I-Thou” relationship.

As this disease takes its toll, connection with the past and present is lost. All sense of futurity is gone.

When my uncle and I tried to leave we discovered we had a problem! There was no way to open the facility’s door from the inside without knowing a special code. This is needed because Alzheimer patients no longer have a sense of “here” or “there” and must be protected in their movements lest they wander aimlessly and into danger. We located a construction worker who let us out.

The best of care will be provided for these dependent patients. And so it should be, for the spark of human dignity remains in them. As Christian teaching would affirm, they yet retain, in spite of their physical brokenness, the Image of God.

Since my visit to that care facility I have often thought of the issue of “personhood” and how a debate on human personhood and abortion has raged for five decades since permissive abortion laws were first put on the books in the 1960’s. Originally designed for “those truly tough cases,” the laws triggered an abortion avalanche and were themselves swept away by the U.S. Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision in January 1973.

“Right to Life” advocates have argued for a biological understanding of personhood. Human life, it is said, begins at conception and ought to be respected and protected from violent assault from then until natural death.

Personhood is tied to the biological fact of being human, one of “us” rather than an “it” or one of “them.” Right to Life advocates have argued for the full personhood of unborn humans or at least that enough claim to personhood exists for the life of the unborn to be worthy of protection.

Others have seen personhood as a developing value throughout the prenatal state. In this case, our unborn have a greater and greater claim to life and protection and any termination of their existence requires increasing grounds for justification the longer they exist in utero. As a result, these people join with the “Right to Life” advocates in wanting to ban late-term abortions.

Defenders of permissive abortion laws, of course, do not see matters that way. Personhood is connected to socializing capabilities, or perhaps to intellectual capacities (or these defenders may simply ignore the personhood issue).

Philosopher Mary Ann Warren argued that there are five traits central to the concept of personhood which we can summarize as (1) consciousness, (2) reasoning, (3) self-motivated activity, (4) the capacity to communicate and (5) the presence of self-concepts and self-awareness. Not all of these need be present for a “person” to exist, but a measure of them must exist and a being that lacks all of them is certainly not a “person” in a moral sense.

Medical ethicist Joseph Fletcher (who popularized “Situation Ethics”) had a long list of personhood criteria, including self awareness, time consciousness, a sense of futurity, a sense of the past, the capability of relating to others, communication and control of existence.

Criteria like these clearly exclude the unborn from the realm of “persons.” Thinking this way, one can rationalize abortion as an acceptable practice secured, as the Court saw it, by a “right to privacy” to be found in the “penumbra” of the U.S. Constitution.

What may surprise others but which should not escape the notice of rationalizers like these is that post-partum infants aren’t “persons” by this standard either. Nor are the comatose and others who lack self-awareness and self-control. Infants lack a moral claim to personhood and therefore are disposable, although we may value them for their potential and charm or for other utilitarian reasons. (One medical ethicist used the term “proximate persons” for infants ages 0-2 years.)

At the extreme edge of the scientific and ethical horizon, a justification could be made for cloning human life and harvesting body parts to serve the rest of us who have successfully achieved our personhood, at least in the eyes of those who control things.

Which brings me full circle to the excellent care facility for Alzheimer patients. By the thinking that has prevailed to give us abortion, these patients are not persons. Unlike the unborn, their futurity and their social and intellectual potential are gone. As their disease has progressed, they have gradually but surely lost all claim to the care and love and protection personhood would afford.

In Roe v. Wade, the court threw up its hands and professed agnosticism on the issue of when personhood begins. Incredibly, it then proceeded to adopt a particular view of personhood (you have value at birth) and imposed a model of prenatal “trimesters” and a permissive latitude that, in effect, have given us abortion on demand. The court never allowed the open public debate and legislative deliberation on this issue that is appropriate in a democratic society.

When the Supreme Court ruled on doctor-assisted suicide in 1997, this practice did not receive the constitutional “green light” its advocates had hoped for. One might have expected the court to declare a right to assisted suicide on the same “right to privacy” grounds that gave us abortion on demand. But the court saw the need to guarantee “an earnest and profound debate about the morality, legality and practicality of physician-assisted suicide [that should take place] in a democratic society.”

That statement may have been the closest thing we will hear from the court that sounds like an apology for Roe v. Wade. Rather than resolving the great debate over abortion rights, Roe v. Wade fueled the most acrimonious polarization of our time which shows no signs of abating now forty-two years later.

(This essay is a revision of an opinion column published in the Long Beach Press-Telegram in 1998.)

Bible Insight

Sticks and Stones
May Break My Bones,
But Words Can REALLY Hurt Me!

 

If you want a month of really profitable Bible reading, take the month of March to read daily one of the 31 chapters in the Bible’s “Book of Proverbs”.

What is the Book of Proverbs? It’s a collection of moral principles on many common issues that help us navigate ethically and honorably in a difficult, sometimes unfair world. Even more, I believe it is a collection God endorses and wants us to know to be wise. One of the key themes of Proverbs is speech—what’s good and not so good. What do we say that either brings help, healing and integrity to a situation or brings bitterness, strife and injustice?

Here are some of the speech counsels we get from Proverbs. After each statement, I give the chapter and verse in Proverbs where you can find it.

    Gossip and Slander

  • A perverse person stirs up conflict,
    and a gossip separates close friends. (16:28)
  • A gossip betrays a confidence,
    but a trustworthy person keeps a secret. (11:13)
  • Whoever conceals hatred with lying lips
    and spreads slander is a fool. (10:18)
    Contentious Words that stir up trouble

  • As charcoal to embers and as wood to fire,
    so is a quarrelsome person for kindling strife. (26:21)
  • Starting a quarrel is like breaching a dam;
    so drop the matter before a dispute breaks out. (17:14)
    Truth and Lies

  • The Lord detests lying lips,
    but he delights in people who are trustworthy. (12:22)
  • A fortune made by a lying tongue

    is a fleeting vapor and a deadly snare. (21:6)
    Too Much Talking, Period!

  • When words are many, sin is not absent
    But he who holds his tongue is wise. (10:19)
  • Do you see someone who speaks in haste?
    There is more hope for a fool than for him. (29:20)
  • Those who guard their mouths and their tongues
    keep themselves from calamity. (21:23)
  • The one who has knowledge uses words with restraint,
    and whoever has understanding is even-tempered. (17:27)
  • The words of the reckless pierce like swords,
    but the tongue of the wise brings healing. (12:18)
    Gracious and gentle words

  • Gracious words are a honeycomb,
    sweet to the soul and healing to the bones. (16:24)
  • A gentle answer turns away wrath,
    but a harsh word stirs up anger. (15:1)

The Bible says our tongues, though small among our bodies’ members, are the hardest part of the body to control (James 3:1-12). With it we bless God one moment and the next moment turn around and curse our neighbor. With encouragement, prayer, Bible reading and God’s grace and power, let’s learn to control the tongue more and more.

Don’s Upcoming Ministries

February 18 – Lead “Ash Wednesday” service at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach (7 PM)

March 22 – Speak in Sunday Morning Worship Services at Grace Community Church of Seal Beach (8:00, 9:30, 11:00)

 

What Our President Should Tell Raul Castro

[Published in the Long Beach Press-Telegram on Dec. 30, 2014]

Cuban President Raul Castro has made it clear that diplomatic relations with the United States will mean no change in his country’s Communist structure, speaking as if the two political systems are moral equivalents and equally embraced by the people.

Now is the time for President Obama to lead with his words in the tradition of John F. Kennedy, who at the Berlin Wall compared democratic rule to East German Communism. “Freedom has many difficulties and democracy is not perfect, but we have never had to put a wall up to keep our people in.”

Here’s a text for our president. “America is not perfect in its democracy. But it is good and its democratic ideals are deeply imbedded in our nation’s soul. It is a government of the people and by the people. The Cuban people on the other hand have not lived as free people. They know nothing about free elections and little about a free economy. Our two governments are not moral equivalents.

“Someday soon the Cuban people should be allowed to freely choose its leaders and the systems it wants, and its rulers should abide by the will of the people. We do not seek to impose change, but we will strongly speak for change and we look forward to the day when the Cuban people will be truly free.”

– Donald P. Shoemaker

Appendix – Richard Nixon on Relations with Cuba

Richard Nixon’s last book, Beyond Peace, was published by Random House in 1994, the year of his death. In it, Nixon looked at the world through the prism of total realism and pragmatism found in his views on international affairs.

Here are his words about Cuba and the United States (pages 137-38):

In the case of Cuba, much of the pressure to keep our economic embargoes in force derives from the long-standing belief, particularly among many in the Cuban exile community, that this is the best way to bring a swift end to the cruel and destructive Castro regime. It is true that the collapse of the Soviet government and the subsequent cutoff of Soviet economic subsidies have put heavy new pressures on Castro. The privation is brutal. Economic conditions on the island, bad before, have become far worse. His police state has nevertheless maintained its iron grip.

The plain fact, painful though it may be to face, is that after thirty-five years of Castro’s rule, the hard line against him has failed to get rid of him. It is time to shift the central focus of our policies from hurting Cuba’s government to helping its people. It is unlikely that Castro, an isolated survivor of the Soviet world, could again mount a serious subversive threat in this hemisphere, even if Cuba’s economy improves. Meanwhile, the condition of his people is desperate and growing worse. They need food, they need the basic essentials of everyday life, they need the rudiments of a functioning economy, and they need freedom.

The unique nature of the relationship between the United States and Cuba gives us a special responsibility toward its people. As long as it seemed reasonable that severe economic pressures would help them overthrow the Castro dictatorship, it was appropriate to maintain those pressures. As long as Castro was part of a global network of communist aggressors, the embargo strengthened international security. But that network has vanished, and our best service to the Cuban people now would be to build pressure from within by actively stimulating Cuba’s contacts with the free world. What has worked in China now has the best chance of working in Cuba.

This means we should drop the economic embargo and open the way to trade, investment, and economic interaction, while insisting that ideas and information be allowed to flow as freely as goods. Today’s global economy is essentially a market economy. Where the market system penetrates, it carries along the seeds of political and economic reform. We should put the challenge squarely to Castro: If he wants his people to prosper, then let him open the door to goods and ideas. If he insists on keeping it shut, it will be clear beyond question that only his fear of freedom stands in the way of his people’s escape from privation. If he opens it, then he opens it also to the winds of freedom.